Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    stjmnsota's Avatar
    stjmnsota is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    333

    Re: Thanking the Pack for worse trade then ours

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "BigEasyViking" wrote:
    correction appreciated, but the whole point is that I would rather have Aikman, E. Smith, M. Irvin and three super bowls. :thumbleft:
    \

    We NEVER would have had Aikman (he was the first overall pick that they "earned" by having that 1-15 record in JJ's first season as coach)...nor would we have gotten Irvin (who wants him anyway, we had better with CC, AC, etc.). Now we could have gotten Emmitt, since he was chosen with the first rounder that we gave Dallass...but there is no guarantee that we would have chosen him anyway. The fact of the matter is that Mike *I walk around with my head in my a$$* Lynn gave away the farm for a player that was totally misused by Jerry Burns and his staff...and gave the Cowboys the foundation to win their SBs in the 90s!
    Well said. Bad trade, but totally misused. Not making the trade probably wouldn't have made much of a difference for the Vikes. The Cowboys put together a good team that no doubt was thanks to the Vikes, but the Vikes wouldn't have put together the same team that the boys had.

  2. #12
    UTVikfan's Avatar
    UTVikfan is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    814

    Re: Thanking the Pack for worse trade then ours

    I have a feeling back to back years of trading Randy and Dante may just make our trade history worse.....we will see. When Peter King gets a sinking feeling that we are trading Dante, I am scared.

  3. #13
    collegeguyjeff's Avatar
    collegeguyjeff is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,304

    Re: Thanking the Pack for worse trade then ours

    i don't think the vikings would have put a team together like dallas did, i mean they got a lot of picks from us then they had that much more picks we just helped them a lot. plus our management sucked real bad
    I don t buy Wisconsin cheese.

  4. #14
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,216

    Re: Thanking the Pack for worse trade then ours

    "collegeguyjeff" wrote:
    i don't think the vikings would have put a team together like dallas did, i mean they got a lot of picks from us then they had that much more picks we just helped them a lot. plus our management sucked real bad
    I'm just curious Jeff,

    We traded for Walker back in 1989, 17 years ago.

    How do you know our management sucked or if we wouldn't have been able to put a team together, considering you're in college now & you were about 4 or 5 tops, at the time of the trade?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  5. #15
    gregair13's Avatar
    gregair13 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    14,576

    Re: Thanking the Pack for worse trade then ours

    "UTVikfan" wrote:
    I feeling that we are trading Dante, I am scared.
    im scared too
    We're bringing purple back.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Man Somehow Getting Worse At Sex
    By Prophet in forum Two Beer Minimum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-12-2009, 12:21 PM
  2. Which is worse???
    By MensaTice in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 09-28-2006, 04:40 PM
  3. THE WORSE EVER????????????
    By vikoles in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-30-2003, 09:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •