Thread: If Green Bay...

goes 3-13 this year, which it looks like they might with the lions and bears and of course the vikes strengthening up in FA, Los will be the only poster left by the end of the season.

no bono to say "kiddo, or chum"...

maybe we will see the packer backer posters become much much more civilized because they know the Favre era is like a three legged dog--funny to watch hop around, but painful to watch cause you pity the poor thing.

just me looking into the crystal football. good luck in 2005 pack.

"PAvikesfan" wrote:

goes 3-13 this year, which it looks like they might with the lions and bears and of course the vikes strengthening up in FA, Los will be the only poster left by the end of the season.

no bono to say "kiddo, or chum"...

maybe we will see the packer backer posters become much much more civilized because they know the Favre era is like a three legged dog--funny to watch hop around, but painful to watch cause you pity the poor thing.

just me looking into the crystal football. good luck in 2005 pack.

Same old Viking drivel on this website every offseason. Favre is old and sucks blah blah blah...Packers suck blah blah blah. Nonetheless, the three time NFC North Champions will be back again this year to smash the fragile conference championship hopes of the Vikings once again. If anyone has any doubts this will happen, just checks the forum posts of this site for the past three years during the offseason. They all contain the same lack of insight. Quite humorous actually.

Thanks for the laughs.

What do you expect from a site named Purplepride? Maybe we are really optimistic and positive about the upcoming season with all of the offseason transactions we have made. We are out-pacing the Pack; no need to be hateful.

So.....

i never said favre sucks, i just said the packers even with favre coming back look like a three-legged dog. hahaha. feel the burn of a crappy and sherman-sleepy off season!

Well, I'd be willing to money against only three wins. :-)

I think Favre will keep us with at least six wins. It'll be how the rest of the team shapes up that will determine how many more after that.

"LosAngelis" wrote:

Well, I'd be willing to money against only three wins. :-)

I think Favre will keep us with at least six wins. It'll be how the rest of the team shapes up that will determine how many more after that.

I'm giving you 4 on Favre alone. Likely you'll squeek another 2 or 3 out. However, you have a tough schedule (As do we), without a lot of "gimme's" on it. Unless your team makes some DRASTIC changes on "D" and shores up that "O" line, you could be in a world of trouble.

It's going to be an interesting year.

Caine

what rating was the packs D last year??? is there agood site to find all this info at?

According to total yardage, Packers 25th, Vikings 28th.

Passing yards allowed, Packers 25th, Vikings 28th.

Rushing yards allowed, Packers 14th, Vikings 21st.

Points allowed, Packers 23rd, Vikings 26th.

"LosAngelis" wrote:

According to total yardage, Packers 25th, Vikings 28th.

Passing yards allowed, Packers 25th, Vikings 28th.

Rushing yards allowed, Packers 14th, Vikings 21st.

Points allowed, Packers 23rd, Vikings 26th.

The point is, we improved our D and you didn't. that is in the past. :bootyshake:

"PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:

"LosAngelis" wrote:

According to total yardage, Packers 25th, Vikings 28th.

Passing yards allowed, Packers 25th, Vikings 28th.

Rushing yards allowed, Packers 14th, Vikings 21st.

Points allowed, Packers 23rd, Vikings 26th.

The point is, we improved our D and you didn't. that is in the past. :bootyshake:

Wasn't making a point. Just answering a question for the nice Viking fan. :-)