Thread: I knew it!

"singersp" wrote:

"PurpleGator" wrote:

"COJOMAY" wrote:

Gads, this was posted weeks ago.

I looked and never saw it, so I posted it.


Oh well, my bad.
Atleast I looked.

I found it in 10 seconds. Here it is.........

[size=13pt]I found Cajun! [/size]

I used the URL address of the picture, so that's why I had better success than you. The thread title certainly doesn't give it away.

Sorry, should I have used a thread title of

"Packer Fans Grab Nutsack During Lambeau Leap"?

=Z=

"Zeus" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"PurpleGator" wrote:

"COJOMAY" wrote:

Gads, this was posted weeks ago.

I looked and never saw it, so I posted it.


Oh well, my bad.
Atleast I looked.

I found it in 10 seconds. Here it is.........

[size=13pt]I found Cajun! [/size]

I used the URL address of the picture, so that's why I had better success than you. The thread title certainly doesn't give it away.

Sorry, should I have used a thread title of

"Packer Fans Grab Nutsack During Lambeau Leap"?

=Z=

LOL! That would have worked. So would have....

"I Found Cajun Grabbing A Nutsack During A Lambeau Leap"

"singersp" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"PurpleGator" wrote:

"COJOMAY" wrote:

Gads, this was posted weeks ago.

I looked and never saw it, so I posted it.


Oh well, my bad.
Atleast I looked.

I found it in 10 seconds. Here it is.........

[size=13pt]I found Cajun! [/size]

I used the URL address of the picture, so that's why I had better success than you. The thread title certainly doesn't give it away.

Sorry, should I have used a thread title of

"Packer Fans Grab Nutsack During Lambeau Leap"?

=Z=

LOL! That would have worked. So would have....

"I Found Cajun Grabbing A Nutsack During A Lambeau Leap"

You have 27000 post, I hope you can find yourself around the website better.

"PurpleGator" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"PurpleGator" wrote:

[quote author=COJOMAY link=topic=40608.msg690113#msg690113 date=1197519598]
Gads, this was posted weeks ago.

I looked and never saw it, so I posted it.


Oh well, my bad.
Atleast I looked.

I found it in 10 seconds. Here it is.........

[size=13pt]I found Cajun! [/size]

I used the URL address of the picture, so that's why I had better success than you. The thread title certainly doesn't give it away.

Sorry, should I have used a thread title of

"Packer Fans Grab Nutsack During Lambeau Leap"?

=Z=

LOL! That would have worked. So would have....

"I Found Cajun Grabbing A Nutsack During A Lambeau Leap"

You have 27000 post, I hope you can find yourself around the website better.



[/quote]

LOL! The search feature works the same no matter how many posts you have. It's just a matter of knowing how to use it.

It was either Zeus or Ultra who suggested it in a thread once to use the web address in the advanced search. It doesn't always work the best, but it does work. I knew the pic that was posted in both threads was from college humor, so the web addresses would be the same.

Probably grabbing his cheesehead

"singersp" wrote:

"PurpleGator" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

[quote author=PurpleGator link=topic=40608.msg690116#msg690116 date=1197519649]
[quote author=COJOMAY link=topic=40608.msg690113#msg690113 date=1197519598]
Gads, this was posted weeks ago.

I looked and never saw it, so I posted it.


Oh well, my bad.
Atleast I looked.

I found it in 10 seconds. Here it is.........

[size=13pt]I found Cajun! [/size]

I used the URL address of the picture, so that's why I had better success than you. The thread title certainly doesn't give it away.

Sorry, should I have used a thread title of

"Packer Fans Grab Nutsack During Lambeau Leap"?

=Z=

LOL! That would have worked. So would have....

"I Found Cajun Grabbing A Nutsack During A Lambeau Leap"

You have 27000 post, I hope you can find yourself around the website better.



[/quote]

LOL! The search feature works the same no matter how many posts you have. It's just a matter of knowing how to use it.

It was either Zeus or Ultra who suggested it in a thread once to use the web address in the advanced search. It doesn't always work the best, but it does work. I knew the pic that was posted in both threads was from college humor, so the web addresses would be the same.
[/quote]

I will take this advice for next time.


Thanks!

Yes because pretending to moon a bunch of guys is more heterosexual.

Maybe the guy is gay. I don't know. Neither do you. But I'd think that's his business.

No, he shouldn't grab someone in public like that. That is pretty uncalled for.

But to pretend like this act reflects upon all Packers' fans is pretty inaccurate.

rttsbgtgb wrote:

Yes because pretending to moon a bunch of guys is more heterosexual.

He was mooning the women, which is ENTIRELY heterosexual.
The men only watched because they were Packer fans.

rttsbgtgb wrote:

Maybe the guy is g*y. I don't know. Neither do you. But I'd think that's his business.

If there's now public physical evidence, it's everyone's business...

rttsbgtgb wrote:

No, he shouldn't grab someone in public like that. That is pretty uncalled for.

Well, I don't know about that either.
Maybe Ruvell Martin told the guy to grab his unit because HE enjoys it...

rttsbgtgb wrote:

But to pretend like this act reflects upon all Packers' fans is pretty inaccurate.

Again, without more proof to the contrary, we have to go with the evidence at hand.
A Packer fan (We know that by the jersey) is grabbing the junk of a Packer player (solicited or not is unknown), and everyone around them is smiling...


So, of 15 Packer fans observed, all ofthem were enjoying the junk pulling, and that would tend to support the assertion that it reflects upon all Packer fans (Except the 2 females), since all Packer fans photographed enjoyed it.
Based upon the 15-for-15 ratio observed, we can extrapolate that out of 100 packer fans, 100 of them would enjoy it.
From there, we can also assume that of 1000 packer fans photographed, 1000 of them would enjoy it, and so on until we get to "all".

Caine

"Caine" wrote:

From there, we can also assume that of 1000 packer fans photographed, 1000 of them would enjoy it, and so on until we get to "all".

Ah I see. So, if I'm ever at a Vikings home game, I'll go ahead and take a picture of the handicap section and assume that that section represents the mental capacity of Vikings fans until we get to the "all" mark.

Fair enough?

"rttsbgtgb" wrote:

"Caine" wrote:

From there, we can also assume that of 1000 packer fans photographed, 1000 of them would enjoy it, and so on until we get to "all".

Ah I see. So, if I'm ever at a Vikings home game, I'll go ahead and take a picture of the handicap section and assume that that section represents the mental capacity of Vikings fans until we get to the "all" mark.

Fair enough?

Fair enough