Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37
  1. #21
    KrackerJack's Avatar
    KrackerJack is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,502

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :

  2. #22
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  3. #23
    jessejames09's Avatar
    jessejames09 is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,233

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "singersp" wrote:
    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?
    His sphincter took a serious beating while Favre was around.

  4. #24
    trippster's Avatar
    trippster is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    42

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "singersp" wrote:
    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?
    He was only injured in one game.

    He pulled a hammy in practice, and the other he broke his foot the second play. He finished the game on his broken foot. I thought that was impressive.

    Jared no doubt will help you. He has to be accounted for. I think the consensus is though, that he alone will not be that much of a difference maker.
    12 Championships with more on the way. GoPackGo!

  5. #25
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,602
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "trippster" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?
    He was only injured in one game.

    He pulled a hammy in practice, and the other he broke his foot the second play. He finished the game on his broken foot. I thought that was impressive.

    Jared no doubt will help you. He has to be accounted for. I think the consensus is though, that he alone will not be that much of a difference maker.
    Luckily, Allen isn't alone on the Vikings defense.
    He is an important piece of the puzzle, but he won't be doing it all himself.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  6. #26
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "trippster" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?
    He was only injured in one game.

    He pulled a hammy in practice, and the other he broke his foot the second play. He finished the game on his broken foot. I thought that was impressive.

    Jared no doubt will help you. He has to be accounted for. I think the consensus is though, that he alone will not be that much of a difference maker.
    What about the other 2 pro bowl starters next to him? I bet pro bowl starter Darren Sharper will be intercepting some of those tipped passes that Allen gets a hand on. Maybe soon to be pro bowler EJ Henderson will benefit from those huge gaps in the line. I would hate to be the quarterback facing this D after the signing of this man they call Jared Allen AKA not much of a difference maker. Mr. I recorded 15 and a half sacks on a piss poor defense last year. Don't forget Mr. Underrated, Antoine Winfield, should be healthy this year.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Fairbanks, AK
    Posts
    1,148

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "trippster" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?
    He was only injured in one game.

    He pulled a hammy in practice, and the other he broke his foot the second play. He finished the game on his broken foot. I thought that was impressive.

    Jared no doubt will help you. He has to be accounted for. I think the consensus is though, that he alone will not be that much of a difference maker.
    Ya Rodgers, "the best backup ever to almost beat the cowboys" (I think I'll trademark that) is real impressive. Pack fans are sucking up the media/Madden crap/drippings and plugging in rodgers as a no let up Favree replacement. Allen "Alone" is not a difference maker. Allen, with Pat & Kevin IS a difference maker. I love how teams that miss out on elite players knock those guys. Every divisional rivals's fans boards and posts are filled with "he's a drunk", (Allen) ""I don't want the guy" (Allen) ""The 'Vikes gave up too much" (Allen) when those same fans would be cartwheeling and shitting themselves if thier team actually pursued and acquired players like Allen. How did the pukes and the bears make themselves better this offseason? All the lame-asses on the bear boards can talk about is Hester. He is the bears wr threat. Thats it. A one trick pony that wont fool the 'Vikes again. And the pack? "Oh rodgers is the awesome! Did you see how he lit up Dallas? No prob. Hall of fame in the making." Lame.
    Tuco the world.....

  8. #28
    NordicNed is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    9,512

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "marstc09" wrote:
    "trippster" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "KrackerJack" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "If you add up the grand total of Super Bowls won by Jared Allen and other recent Vikings aditions Bernard Berrian, Madeu Williams, Michael Boulware, Steve Hutchinson, Darren Sharper, Ryan Longwell, Gus Frerrotte it comes to a grand total of Zero. If they couldn't get it done in other places, many times in more favorable situations, why do Minnesota fans think it'll be any different for them? The Vikes had like 7 players in the Pro Bowl last season and didn't make the playoffs or even finish with a winning record."
    And if you take the Packers current roster & offseason additions, how many Super Bowl wins does that add up to?

    Me thinks a grand total of 0.


    So why do Packer fans think they are going to be better than the Vikings without Favre, the leader of the flock?
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas... :
    I'd have to say he did look good during that game. But that was only part of 1 game & not enough to say that's the type of play you'll see out of him for 16 games. Also his previous two appearances both resulted in injuries & one has to question just how injury prone is he?
    He was only injured in one game.

    He pulled a hammy in practice, and the other he broke his foot the second play. He finished the game on his broken foot. I thought that was impressive.

    Jared no doubt will help you. He has to be accounted for. I think the consensus is though, that he alone will not be that much of a difference maker.
    What about the other 2 pro bowl starters next to him? I bet pro bowl starter Darren Sharper will be intercepting some of those tipped passes that Allen gets a hand on. Maybe soon to be pro bowler EJ Henderson will benefit from those huge gaps in the line. I would hate to be the quarterback facing this D after the signing of this man they call Jared Allen AKA not much of a difference maker. Mr. I recorded 15 and a half sacks on a piss poor defense last year. Don't forget Mr. Underrated, Antoine Winfield, should be healthy this year.
    Couldn't have said it much better Mar, Allen will be like Strahan is to the Giants, only we have even better players to surround him than the Giants do to Strahan..... Our D is going to be one faired unit on the field and thruout the league..Thats for sure.


    I LOVE THE SMELL OF VICTORY IN THE MORNING AIR.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    1,128

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas...
    I might be new here, but isn't it almost axiomatic that a back up QB coming into a game, where the opposing defense game planned for the starter almost always looks stellar?
    Didn't people on this site oo and ahh over Brooks when he came in for an injured TJack, and the following week fell flat on his.....face?
    Good luck Pack :

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Fairbanks, AK
    Posts
    1,148

    Re: Comments from PackersNews.com on Jared Allen

    "Bkfldviking" wrote:
    Because Rodgers looked soooo promising in that half game against Dallas...
    I might be new here, but isn't it almost axiomatic that a back up QB coming into a game, where the opposing defense game planned for the starter almost always looks stellar?
    Didn't people on this site oo and ahh over Brooks when he came in for an injured TJack, and the following week fell flat on his.....face?
    Good luck Pack :
    So what? Good point!
    Tuco the world.....

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Jared Allen
    By Purple Floyd in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-08-2011, 05:55 PM
  2. Jared Allen Sig
    By MulletMullitia in forum Help / Suggestion Box
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-14-2009, 12:34 AM
  3. Replies: 62
    Last Post: 11-11-2008, 07:34 AM
  4. Could i get a Jared Allen sig please????
    By dcboardr41 in forum Help / Suggestion Box
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 10:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •