anyone notice?

**RK.** · 01-09-2005, 07:47 PM

Did anyone once in all the post game analysis hear anyone say that the packers lost because of Favre and his 4 int? Did you hear anyone say he didn't have his head in the game? Did you hear anyone say maybe he isn't as good as his stats or press? Or that he is just too old anymore to get it done?

If Culpeper had thrown 4 int and lost 31-17 I guarantee the press would have been all over him and blaming him for the lack luster performance and for losing the game, etc. :P

**fan4favre** · 01-09-2005, 07:51 PM

"RK" wrote:

Did anyone once in all the post game analysis hear anyone say that the packers lost because of Favre and his 4 int? Did you hear anyone say he didn't have his head in the game? Did you hear anyone say maybe he isn't as good as his stats or press? Or that he is just too old anymore to get it done?

If Culpeper had thrown 4 int and lost 31-17 I guarantee the press would have been all over him and blaming him for the lack luster performance and for losing the game, etc. :P

3 picks should have been caught or avoided by his receivers. That is why you don't make a big deal of 4 picks that should have been only 1. For crying out loud, which game were you watching? Or are you just trying to harp on Favre for no particular reason as most Vikings fans do.

**Caine** · 01-09-2005, 07:54 PM

"fan4favre" wrote:

"RK" wrote:

Did anyone once in all the post game analysis hear anyone say that the packers lost because of Favre and his 4 int? Did you hear anyone say he didn't have his head in the game? Did you hear anyone say maybe he isn't as good as his stats or press? Or that he is just too old anymore to get it done?

If Culpeper had thrown 4 int and lost 31-17 I guarantee the press would have been all over him and blaming him for the lack luster performance and for losing the game, etc. :P

3 picks should have been caught or avoided by his receivers. That is why you don't make a big deal of 4 picks that should have been only 1. For crying out loud, which game were you watching? Or are you just trying to harp on Favre for no particular reason as most Vikings fans do.

So you're saying the Receivers suck?

Hell, I've been saying that for two years...but Pcaker fans argue 'till they're blue about how wonderful they are.

So, which one sucked today? The Receivers or Favre?

Caine

**ultravikingfan** · 01-09-2005, 07:54 PM

"fan4favre" wrote:

"RK" wrote:

Did anyone once in all the post game analysis hear anyone say that the packers lost because of Favre and his 4 int? Did you hear anyone say he didn't have his head in the game? Did you hear anyone say maybe he isn't as good as his stats or press? Or that he is just too old anymore to get it done?

If Culpeper had thrown 4 int and lost 31-17 I guarantee the press would have been all over him and blaming him for the lack luster performance and for losing the game, etc. :P

3 picks should have been caught or avoided by his receivers. That is why you don't make a big deal of 4 picks that should have been only 1. For crying out loud, which game were you watching? Or are you just trying to harp on Favre for no particular reason as most Vikings fans do.

Very typical hear. "Oh, if he didn't have a 300 lb lineman dragging him down, he wouldn't have thrown it". Excuses. Trust us, we have been saying those all year long. Now we won, your turn!

**zzbudzz** · 01-09-2005, 07:54 PM

fan4favrve ,crawl back in your hole ....and SHUTUP! farve under threw balls all game long? ya'll looked bad and the score showed it ! good-bye
...and have a nice off season

**Toss2Moss84** · 01-09-2005, 07:55 PM

"fan4favre" wrote:

3 picks should have been caught or avoided by his receivers. That is why you don't make a big deal of 4 picks that should have been only 1. For crying out loud, which game were you watching? Or are you just trying to harp on Favre for no particular reason as most Vikings fans do.

But the great Brett Favre is immortal. What's he doing throwing ANY INTS.

Oh yeah BTW Pepper>Favray

**XTAP59** · 01-09-2005, 07:55 PM

"Caine" wrote:

"fan4favre" wrote:

"RK" wrote:

Did anyone once in all the post game analysis hear anyone say that the packers lost because of Favre and his 4 int? Did you hear anyone say he didn't have his head in the game? Did you hear anyone say maybe he isn't as good as his stats or press? Or that he is just too old anymore to get it done?

If Culpeper had thrown 4 int and lost 31-17 I guarantee the press would have been all over him and blaming him for the lack luster performance and for losing the game, etc. :P

3 picks should have been caught or avoided by his receivers. That is why you don't make a big deal of 4 picks that should have been only 1. For crying out loud, which game were you watching? Or are you just trying to harp on Favre for no particular reason as most Vikings fans do.

So you're saying the Receivers suck?

Hell, I've been saying that for two years...but Pcaker fans argue 'till they're blue about how wonderful they are.

So, which one sucked today? The Receivers or Favre?

Caine

I'll vote for both did today.......

**vikoles** · 01-09-2005, 07:56 PM

go aawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwway and HIBERNAYTE 4fan LOSERRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!

**RK.** · 01-09-2005, 07:59 PM

Nice try fan4favre. :lol: Its just that Vikes fans get tired of seeing him always get a pass when he is crappy. For instance we listened to weeks of how Favre was playing hurt with his thumb and overcoming the pain etc.
Randy Moss goes out today and with a sprained ankle that he can hardly walk on beats his man and makes a TD. Did you hear anyone say wow how can he play through the pain? No, not a word just that ole dreadlocks blew the coverage. :P

The fact of the matter is Farve blew the game today and ended your season plain and simple. :bootyshake:

:bootyshake: <--------- This is going to be real popular around here I think :lol:

**sandviking** · 01-09-2005, 10:22 PM

"fan4favre" wrote:

"RK" wrote:

Did anyone once in all the post game analysis hear anyone say that the packers lost because of Favre and his 4 int? Did you hear anyone say he didn't have his head in the game? Did you hear anyone say maybe he isn't as good as his stats or press? Or that he is just too old anymore to get it done?

If Culpeper had thrown 4 int and lost 31-17 I guarantee the press would have been all over him and blaming him for the lack luster performance and for losing the game, etc. :P

3 picks should have been caught or avoided by his receivers. That is why you don't make a big deal of 4 picks that should have been only 1. For crying out loud, which game were you watching? Or are you just trying to harp on Favre for no particular reason as most Vikings fans do.

What game was I watching? The one where Favre threw 4 interceptions!!! I thought he was immortal, or at least that's what is said on most of the sports shows. He is a great player, but he is just a man.....that threw 4 pics.