Will We Get McNabb???

**rednorsk** · 12-18-2010, 12:01 AM

McNabb was a very good Quarterback, but we don't need another "almost" over the hill veteran. The Vikings need to build a new team with Leslie Frazier as it's Head Coach.

**Purple Floyd** · 12-18-2010, 12:12 AM

I have always despised McNabb and if they sign him more than likely I will turn on like like Marr turned on Favre. I suppose I should start to think up a quippy moniker for him now just in case.

**2beersTommy** · 12-18-2010, 12:14 AM

Originally Posted by "Prophet" #1084383

Originally Posted by "jargomcfargo" #1084382

He's no better than TJ.
No.

lmao. How can he not be better than TJack? I would give singersp a shot at QB with his purple socks and all. At least it would be more entertaining than watching TJack.

exactly, too effing funny

**Infidel** · 12-18-2010, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by "Purple Floyd" #1084473

I have always despised McNabb and if they sign him more than likely I will turn on him like Marr turned on Favre. I suppose I should start to think up a quippy moniker for him now just in case.

McNoodle comes immediately to mind.

**12purplepride28** · 12-18-2010, 03:29 AM

Originally Posted by "marshallvike" #1084465

McNabb- 0 Super Bowl wins
Vikings-0 Super Bowl wins
0+0 still equals 0

Aaron Rodgers=0
Any Rookie QB=0

Nice logic

**kevoncox** · 12-18-2010, 12:43 PM

I will like to point out that Mcnabb's teams entered the NFCCG with some of the worst teams ever. He rarely had a healthy Westbrook and his receiving corps was terrible.

Also, I believe we can sign Mcnabb to a 3 year deal and draft a rookie QB like Cam(i want Luck). In 3 years McNabb will be in his mid 30s and you can switched to an experienced QB in our young Qb.

**snowinapril** · 12-18-2010, 03:45 PM

Originally Posted by "12purplepride28" #1084482

Originally Posted by "marshallvike" #1084465

McNabb- 0 Super Bowl wins
Vikings-0 Super Bowl wins
0+0 still equals 0

Aaron Rodgers=0
Any Rookie QB=0

Nice logic

LOL, how many QBs have multiple Superbowl wins. They would be the only guys that had previously won a superbowl and would not carry a zero in this equation. Now how many QBs had a superbowl win, went back and lost. Now how many QBs played a superbowl and lost then came back and won a superbowl later.

Every QB that isn't a multi Superbowl winner had a 0 in this equation at one time or another.

No starting quarterback on your (our) team = 0.

We don't even have a (legit) QB at this time. Webb is not going to be ready that kid is R.A.W.

Stop gap = McNabb, spend what you have to and get him in purple. All we need is to get someone to drive the car. I know that we aren't tuned up like last year, but it is still a car, needs a couple parts replaced.

**Caine** · 12-18-2010, 03:48 PM

The bigger question - for me anyway - is "Do we really WANT McNabb?"

When we had Chiller here, it made sense. The *cough* "KAO" *cough* was built around a system McNabb knew well. With a complete lack of realistic QB options here, it was a slam dunk certainty that we were going to make a play for McNabb if he was available.

Now, we have to wait and see who the next HC/OC will be. Then we have to assess whether or not McNabb will fit the new system well.

And, most importantly, we have to find our NEXT QB within the next 2 years, regardless of who we acquire now.

Make no mistake, McNabb can help us transition to the new system - I have no doubts about that. But the idea of the perfect marriage between System and QB is now gone. And McNabb's lack of success in Washington does raise questions - depending upon who the new HC/OC will be.

Caine

**snowinapril** · 12-18-2010, 04:03 PM

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1084494

The bigger question - for me anyway - is "Do we really WANT McNabb?"

When we had Chiller here, it made sense. The *cough* "KAO" *cough* was built around a system McNabb knew well. With a complete lack of realistic QB options here, it was a slam dunk certainty that we were going to make a play for McNabb if he was available.

Now, we have to wait and see who the next HC/OC will be. Then we have to assess whether or not McNabb will fit the new system well.

And, most importantly, we have to find our NEXT QB within the next 2 years, regardless of who we acquire now.

Make no mistake, McNabb can help us transition to the new system - I have no doubts about that. But the idea of the perfect marriage between System and QB is now gone. And McNabb's lack of success in Washington does raise questions - depending upon who the new HC/OC will be.

Caine

True, but as the team sits now, would Frasier if he was still coach, can Bevell to bring in his own. I am not sure changing our offensive scheme is the best idea at this time. Maybe it is. This topic goes into the debate of the next coach.

I agree, my comments for wanting McNabb is only if we stay with the WCO. Fits my drive the car statement, if we switch cars, I want another driver besides McNabb. I am sure that McNabb would like to go to a team that has the WCO. He doesn't want to learn a new system, old dog new trick.

**Infidel** · 12-18-2010, 04:32 PM

Maybe a good idea for a thread would be a discussion on the options available that Frazier or a new head coach might decide to go for.

I, for one, am not familiar with those options and how they might improve the offense.

I get the feeling from some posts that the WCO is no good and others seem to feel that the rigid way Childress ran it was the problem.