Why not trade Smoot for Plummer?

**Vikestand** · 01-09-2007, 09:07 PM

We need a QB right?....Plummer would be a great guy to have for the Vikings....And they obviously want to get rid of him...Also they are obviously looking for a CB right now....What do you guys think?

**BadlandsVikings** · 01-09-2007, 09:09 PM

we won't have to bench him will we?

**Vikestand** · 01-09-2007, 09:11 PM

hell no...He is the best option out there...

**ultravikingfan** · 01-09-2007, 09:14 PM

We do not need him.

If TJ is our future, then let him be that and Brooks as the #2.

**LuckyVike** · 01-09-2007, 09:22 PM

Why would we want Plummer?

**SharperImage42** · 01-09-2007, 09:30 PM

we need a receiver more than we need a qb right now, but i do like wat ur saying though

**Vikestand** · 01-09-2007, 09:32 PM

Believe it...we need a QB....TJ is not going to be our future...

**Potus2028** · 01-09-2007, 09:33 PM

heck yes!

well, i dont know about trading smoot for him

but i would like to add plummer to our roster. dont get me wrong, i like TJack, but i think plummer is better

**vikinginvirginia** · 01-09-2007, 09:36 PM

How do you already know that TJ is not the future?

As for Plummer:

ATT Cm

%

yds
td
int
Passer rating
2006 Denver Broncos 317 175
55.2 1994
11
13

68.8

Johnson 2006 vikes
439 270
61.5
2750
9
15

72.0

Plummer looks like a newer version of BJ. I really don't see Plummer as an upgrade. I really want to see TJ get his shot.

**fabybaby32** · 01-09-2007, 09:37 PM

Heres the thing that strays me away from a qb like plummer.
He could come in and win a few games, but then a year or two from now we are in the same situation we just went through with brad.
An old qb maybe past his prime.