Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Who's To Blame?

  1. #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Who's To Blame?

    [size=18px]Who's To Blame? [/size]

    By: John Holler

    Date: Apr 1, 2006


    With the hard feelings between the Vikings and Seahawks apparently over with the Vikes refusal to match the offer on Nate Burleson, the aftermath has left the NFL looking to look at changing the rules involved in both deals. But, it all could have simply been avoided if both teams hadn't low-balled their respective offers to each player.

    The malaise between the Vikings and Seahawks over the contentious signings of Steve Hutchinson and Nate Burleson has experience a ripple effect throughout the NFL – to the point the outgoing Commissioner Paul Tagliabue made a point to say that the rules surrounding “poison pills” in contracts need to be changed. Modifications of those rules will likely be in place prior to the next free agent period.

    But one fact that shouldn’t be lost on fans, the teams involved and the rest of the NFL is that, if either the Vikings or the Seahawks weren’t playing “lawyer ball” they would both still have their players.

    The difference between the Seahawks giving Hutchinson a one-year franchise tag or a transition tag was less than $600,000 – a franchise tag of $6.98 million as opposed to $6.39 million he would have been paid had nobody stepped up and made him an offer. The Vikings could have kept Burleson simply by throwing a first-round tender offer on him – the difference being $1.55 million for a first-round tender as opposed to the $712,000 offered for a third-round tender. The Vikes were almost daring teams to take Burleson away…and someone did.

    Rob Brzezinski referred to the Seahawks offer sheet to Burleson – a seven-year, $49 million deal that in actuality if a four-year, $14.5 million deal – as “a sham.” That may be a tad disingenuous for the guy who was behind the initial poison pill deal that forced the hand of the Seahawks. But, the bottom line is that, with all the attention that has been brought to both deals, if either team had been serious about keeping either Hutchinson or Burleson, they would still be with their current teams.

    The unfortunate aspect of this dust-up is that when the Vikings play in Seattle this year, Hutchinson will be booed lustily. He has been painted as a villain in the local media – which is unfortunate. Vikings fans likely blame the Vikings for making it so easy to take Burleson away. The same should be said for Hutchinson, but, because the Vikings struck first, Seahawks fans were dumbfounded by the stipulations and, from the local media perspective at least, Hutch has been painted as the bad guy.

    By the time teams throw transition or restricted free agent offers in 2007, the parameters of how they are done will change. But, when the dust settles, the fact of the matter is this – if either team felt any obligation to Hutchinson or Burleson, they would still be with their former teams. They didn’t. Game over. Get over it.

    SATURDAY NOTES
    ** Local media types can take heart in knowing that eventually they will win Brad Childress over. He spoke to the Philadelphia Daily News about Donovan McNabb and the Vikings. Here’s what he had to say about McNabb’s return to form without him and Terrell Owens.
    "He's a prideful guy," Childress said. "He's fully aware of all the things that were said about him last year, whether it was teammates or whether it was [newspaper] articles, whatever it was. He doesn't have his head in the sand. From that standpoint, I think he'll come in with a chip on his shoulder and know that he's got to re-establish himself on the field.'

    When asked about how the Vikings offense will differ from the Eagles, Childress was tounge-in-cheek with his response.

    "About 60 times a game," Childress quipped. "I think you have to run it a lot in this division. That's how we've set up the offensive line. You've got to let those guys pound on people for a while before you ask them to step back [and pass-protect]. Take [the defensive players] and shake them. Knock them around and kind of take their will away a little bit."

    Who's To Blame?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #2
    Mr-holland's Avatar
    Mr-holland is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,443

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    Blaim us? f*ck 'em.
    We had the better end of the deal, swallow it.
    Rosie O'Donnell is a dude!

  3. #3
    Benet's Avatar
    Benet is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,976

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    Blame for what? We get an All-Pro Guard and a Third Round pick for a #2 Wide Receiver.

    The "poison pill" clauses will be made illegal under the CBA soon and that'll be the end of the matter.

    Onwards and upwards.

  4. #4
    COJOMAY is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,005

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    Hey, don't blame Rob Brzezinski for Hutch's "poison pill" offer. It was added because Hutch's agent wanted it in there.
    Kentucky Vikes Fan

    When you require nothing, you get nothing; when you expect nothing, you will find nothing; when you embrace nothing, all you will have is nothing.

  5. #5
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    "COJOMAY" wrote:
    Hey, don't blame Rob Brzezinski for Hutch's "poison pill" offer. It was added because Hutch's agent wanted it in there.
    Rob already admitted he came up with the pill.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  6. #6
    Benet's Avatar
    Benet is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,976

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    singersp is right, it's all here:

    A bitter 'Poison Pill' to swallow

    In response, the architect of the provision passionately defended his motives and revealed he has been urging the league to address the loophole. In a rare interview, Rob Brzezinski, the Vikings vice president of football operations, discounted the notion of allowing unwritten rules to govern contract negotiations.

    But with regards to the Vikings becoming the NFL's collective Pariah, if it wasn't our franchise that did this, an executive at another team would have eventually thought of it. That's how it works; without this whole saga and (in my mind) over-reaction from the NFL, the matter would never have been brought to the NFL's attention and it certainly would not be dealt with in the next couple of months as it is going to be now.

    Onwards and upwards.

  7. #7
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,055

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    Who cares... We got arguably the best OG in the NFL without giving up a draft pick.. The Seagulls got a unproven 2nd WR, and had to give up a 3rd rd pick.. We for sure got the better of that arrangement..

  8. #8
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    But one fact that shouldn’t be lost on fans, the teams involved and the rest of the NFL is that, if either the Vikings or the Seahawks weren’t playing “lawyer ball” they would both still have their players.
    But, the bottom line is that, with all the attention that has been brought to both deals, if either team had been serious about keeping either Hutchinson or Burleson, they would still be with their current teams.
    This guy has been reading my post. I said the same exact thing about a week ago.

  9. #9
    magicci's Avatar
    magicci is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    oxnard, ca
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    blame it on the rain

  10. #10
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Who's To Blame?

    "magicci" wrote:
    blame it on the rain
    Blame it on Rio or blame it on the Bossonova.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The Blame Thread
    By BadlandsVikings in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-08-2010, 07:50 AM
  2. Want someone to blame?
    By DREWBREEESS in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-25-2010, 06:45 AM
  3. Need Someone to Blame?.....Blame a Dead Guy
    By BadlandsVikings in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-13-2006, 12:29 PM
  4. Who do you blame?
    By Zeus in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 04-20-2006, 03:35 PM
  5. Let me tell you who really is to blame.......
    By 841623speed in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-23-2003, 12:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •