What's Your Favorite Potential Draft Day Trade

**kevoncox** · 04-26-2008, 08:00 AM

There are alot of potential trades out there. Which one would you not have a problem with?

**PAViking** · 04-26-2008, 08:09 AM

4 out of the 5 I don't think are very realistic.

**kevoncox** · 04-26-2008, 08:14 AM

"PAViking" wrote:

4 out of the 5 I don't think are very realistic.

Hey, trading for Allen 2 weeks ago was unreasonable.

**PAViking** · 04-26-2008, 08:21 AM

"kevoncox" wrote:

"PAViking" wrote:

4 out of the 5 I don't think are very realistic.

Hey, trading for Allen 2 weeks ago was unreasonable.

True, but I think for those guys you would need a first or high second to even consider them. So unless they give up next years picks... but anything is possible i guess.

**Garland Greene** · 04-26-2008, 08:26 AM

I am convinced that the Vikes have something cooking

But No to Shockey to much money and way to many injuries. Why do you think he is on the trading Block?

Taylor why would we do that? why is everyone so against a 1-2 RB combo that we have?

Taylor Would like but not with having to give up our second. Not have a pick to the 4th round?

Sheppard Eagles would want more than what we would have to give up for Taylor. No Thanks

BM Possible but we would need value in return.

**kevoncox** · 04-26-2008, 08:35 AM

"Garland" wrote:

I am convinced that the Vikes have something cooking

But No to Shockey to much money and way to many injuries. Why do you think he is on the trading Block?

Taylor why would we do that? why is everyone so against a 1-2 RB combo that we have?

Taylor Would like but not with having to give up our second. Not have a pick to the 4th round?

Sheppard Eagles would want more than what we would have to give up for Taylor. No Thanks

BM Possible but we would need value in return.

Sorry GG I mean Jason Taylor. I'll fix it.

**DustinDupont** · 04-26-2008, 08:55 AM

i said move down and get some extra picks... but i really would be happy with any of those trades, i just dont see them happening

**Jimmymeboy** · 04-26-2008, 09:12 AM

"PAViking" wrote:

4 out of the 5 I don't think are very realistic.

I'll go ya 1 better and say 5 out of 5 are not going to happen! :

**gregair13** · 04-26-2008, 09:58 AM

I don't want crybaby loser shockey
I don't think we need Lito for the price it will take to get him
I don't want crybaby CJ
I don't want old man taylor. we have allen.
Traind down seems logical.

**KrackerJack** · 04-26-2008, 10:19 AM

The thing is we'd have to give up a lot for these players, including a 2nd even if we were to get them without our 1st, and 2nd rounder should be used to help fill a position of need (some will say WR is still one position of need, i don't think it is, but we won't get chad without a 1st rounder, maybe next years? but i doubt it) Use that 2nd for an OT IMO, don't trade it away for a luxury, TE can be called a need also...but not as big as OT IMO, and i fricken hate Shockey...Id only see us trading down if there aren't position of need players worth the pick and we could get them at a later time...