Thread: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
-
03-04-2006, 06:19 PM #1
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 2,876
Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
Viking Update Staff - Scout.com
March 3, 2006 at 8:43am ET
The Vikings had five wide receivers that were viewed as co-starters last year. But the team has gambled that other teams won't be willing to jump on Nate Burleson.
When the Vikings traded Randy Moss, the ascent of Nate Burleson was expected. Burleson, who was coming off a 1,000-yard season, was given help with the signing of veterans Travis Taylor and Koren Robinson , but Burleson was expected to be the top dog of the receiver corps.
That plan, it would appear, has changed. The Vikings announced Thursday that Burleson, a restricted free agent, was given the minimum qualifying offer of $712,000. If a team signs Burleson to an offer sheet and the Vikings don't match, the new team would only have to give up a third-round draft pick as compensation -- the same round in which the Vikings originally drafted Burleson.
While there is still talk that the Vikings will look to sign Burleson to a long-term contract, had the team made a qualifying offer of $1.5 million, they could have effectively taken Burleson off the market, since it would have required a first-round pick as compensation.
FRIDAY NOTES
* The Daunte Culpepper rumors have begun again. Reports coming out Thursday indicated the Vikings are once again in talks with teams about Culpepper's availability -- citing differences with new coach Brad Childress as to why the team is willing to part with their former Pro Bowl quarterback.
* Why did the Vikings put a transition tag on CB Brian Williams ? They could afford to. The cost of putting a tag on cornerbacks dropped more than any other position in the league in 2006 compared against 2005. In 2005, if the Vikings had wanted to put a franchise tag on Williams, it would have cost $8.82 million -- with a transition tag running $6.94 million. By doing it this year, the Vikings are only on the hook for $4.77 million -- a drop of $2.2 million of the average of the top 10 salaries. Had the team put the franchise tag on him, it would have cost $5.893 million -- a drop of almost $3 million from 2005.
* In its free agency preview, The Sporting News listed the Vikings as one of the top three potential suitors of 49ers linebacker Julian Peterson, No. 2 for those teams in the running for Eagles tackle Jon Runyan and the No. 1 choice for RB Edgerrin James.
* The Patriots are rumored to be interested in both Sam Cowart and Burleson.
* The Colts, who are expected to not be able to afford to keep Mike Vanderjagt as their kicker, have Paul Edinger on their short list of potential replacements.
* The Chiefs are expected to make a run at pass-rushing DE Lance Johnstone .
* The Cardinals might be the Vikings' top competition for guard Toniu Fonoti , who is among the top available guard free agents in the weak Class of 2006.
* Both the Rams and Packers are expected to make a run at trying to sign Brian Williams away from the Vikings.
-
03-04-2006, 06:22 PM #2
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
I don't want to lose him, but a third round pick this year is still a good pick.
REDHORSE
-
03-04-2006, 06:31 PM #3
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
I don't want to lose him either, but I've said it before: all of our recievers are expendable.
-
03-04-2006, 06:31 PM #4
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
Julian! Man it'd be awesome to get him and James. Take up alotta cap tho...would be worth it tho.

Theres NOTHING greater then a Florida Gator!
"I promise everyone this. When Childress is let go in two years I can honestly say this.
"I am not surprised"."-PurplePackerEater
-
03-04-2006, 06:40 PM #5
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
"michaelmazid" wrote:
I like those notes!!!!Viking Update Staff - Scout.com
March 3, 2006 at 8:43am ET
The Vikings had five wide receivers that were viewed as co-starters last year. But the team has gambled that other teams won't be willing to jump on Nate Burleson.
When the Vikings traded Randy Moss, the ascent of Nate Burleson was expected. Burleson, who was coming off a 1,000-yard season, was given help with the signing of veterans Travis Taylor and Koren Robinson , but Burleson was expected to be the top dog of the receiver corps.
That plan, it would appear, has changed. The Vikings announced Thursday that Burleson, a restricted free agent, was given the minimum qualifying offer of $712,000. If a team signs Burleson to an offer sheet and the Vikings don't match, the new team would only have to give up a third-round draft pick as compensation -- the same round in which the Vikings originally drafted Burleson.
While there is still talk that the Vikings will look to sign Burleson to a long-term contract, had the team made a qualifying offer of $1.5 million, they could have effectively taken Burleson off the market, since it would have required a first-round pick as compensation.
FRIDAY NOTES
* The Daunte Culpepper rumors have begun again. Reports coming out Thursday indicated the Vikings are once again in talks with teams about Culpepper's availability -- citing differences with new coach Brad Childress as to why the team is willing to part with their former Pro Bowl quarterback.
* Why did the Vikings put a transition tag on CB Brian Williams ? They could afford to. The cost of putting a tag on cornerbacks dropped more than any other position in the league in 2006 compared against 2005. In 2005, if the Vikings had wanted to put a franchise tag on Williams, it would have cost $8.82 million -- with a transition tag running $6.94 million. By doing it this year, the Vikings are only on the hook for $4.77 million -- a drop of $2.2 million of the average of the top 10 salaries. Had the team put the franchise tag on him, it would have cost $5.893 million -- a drop of almost $3 million from 2005.
* In its free agency preview, The Sporting News listed the Vikings as one of the top three potential suitors of 49ers linebacker Julian Peterson, No. 2 for those teams in the running for Eagles tackle Jon Runyan and the No. 1 choice for RB Edgerrin James.
* The Patriots are rumored to be interested in both Sam Cowart and Burleson.
* The Colts, who are expected to not be able to afford to keep Mike Vanderjagt as their kicker, have Paul Edinger on their short list of potential replacements.
* The Chiefs are expected to make a run at pass-rushing DE Lance Johnstone .
* The Cardinals might be the Vikings' top competition for guard Toniu Fonoti , who is among the top available guard free agents in the weak Class of 2006.
* Both the Rams and Packers are expected to make a run at trying to sign Brian Williams away from the Vikings.
-
03-04-2006, 06:43 PM #6
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
Julian in the purple & gold
Its not braggin if you can do it!!!
-
03-04-2006, 06:52 PM #7
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 2,876
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
I always thought that the vikes jumped on Burleson's bandwagon alittle too quick. He was a product of Moss. Everyone would double or triple team moss and burely was always man to man. I think New England would be a great place for him. He'll be just one of the guys there but man I would hate to see Brian Williams leave.

-
03-04-2006, 06:53 PM #8
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
There is already a thread going around on Burleson;
Vikings place qualifying offer on Burleson on this topic.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
I like Burly, but wouldn't be heartbroken so see him leave. I think there are places where he would probably fit better, and there are otehr recievers on our roster who I think could fill the #1 spot.
HOwever, if Burly does leave, they need to step up and get a solid contract on K-Rob! I think K-Rob - Taylor - WIlliamson would be a good recieving corp.Zeus wrote:
When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?
=Z=
-
03-04-2006, 07:06 PM #10
Re: Vikings Low-Ball Burleson
"michaelmazid" wrote:
Were other teams double teaming Moss while he was on the sidelines injured?I always thought that the vikes jumped on Burleson's bandwagon alittle too quick. He was a product of Moss. Everyone would double or triple team moss and burely was always man to man. I think New England would be a great place for him. He'll be just one of the guys there but man I would hate to see Brian Williams leave."There is good and there is evil. And evil must be punished. Even in the face of Armageddon I will not compromise."
Similar Threads
-
Vikings game ball
By Mystophales in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 13Last Post: 11-11-2007, 05:13 PM -
Vikings receivers need to get on the ball
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 10Last Post: 10-22-2006, 10:26 AM -
Vikings place qualifying offer on Burleson
By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 14Last Post: 03-03-2006, 06:33 PM -
Nate Burleson will carry the Vikings on his back on Sunday
By Salzy in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 13Last Post: 01-16-2005, 10:20 AM


Reply With Quote











Bookmarks