Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 76 of 76
  1. #71
    seaniemck7's Avatar
    seaniemck7 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    1,453

    Re: Vikings eyeing Nate Washington

    Well if we didnt get Housh, at least we didnt sign washington.

  2. #72
    mark is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    541

    Re: Vikings eyeing Nate Washington

    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Prophet" wrote:
    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Prophet" wrote:
    "bleedpurple" wrote:
    [quote author=ejmat link=topic=50707.msg913216#msg913216 date=1235749864]
    [quote author=oaklandzoo24 link=topic=50707.msg913212#msg913212 date=1235749676]
    "Nate Washington has always been a enigma to Steelers fans. Some (like me) have always had a (maybe unhealthy) fascination with his big-play ability. Other Steelers fans have been constantly frustrated by his tendency to drop passes."
    From that link.

    Isnt that exactly what we don't need?
    I'll tell you this.
    He catches more passes than TWill did.
    The Steelers are used to HInes Ward and Santanio Holmes that catch just about everything thrown at them.
    Nate runs a lot of deep routes which make it more difficult.
    screw that!!!.. we need a good route runner not another deep threat... plus he's not even that good...
    lol, ejmat, that is the weakest argument I have ever heard from you....
    He catches more passes than TWill did
    lmao, you had crack for b-fast again.
    LOL Proph.
    You know I did kind of think about that as my fingers were typing it yet I hit the "Post" button still.
    Seriously though I've watched Nate play his entire career with Pittsburgh and I can tell you he's a decent player than can make big plays.


    I will recant my TWill argument because it WAS one of the stupidest statements I have ever made.
    Thanks for keeping me on my toes Bleed and Prophet.
    Let me say this instead.
    If anything he is a huge upgrade over Bobby Wade and at this point Sydney Rice (since he has yet to prove himeself).
    Is that better?
    Better, but, once it's in the pp.o archives it is fair game to dredge, out of context, at any point in time for ammunition in some other worthless discussion.
    [/quote]

    Yes and I deserve that to be brought up later and used against me.
    I will shoulder any heat that comes from that statement.
    You know, if that's the only thing people can bring up against me after a little over 4 years I am doing pretty good.
    However this statement deserves to be put up in the "Dumbest Statements on PPO" thread.

    [/quote]

    Bro,I wont even begin to say the things you said about O. Smith
    <!--
    sig -->

  3. #73
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Vikings eyeing Nate Washington

    "mark" wrote:
    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Prophet" wrote:
    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Prophet" wrote:
    [quote author=bleedpurple link=topic=50707.msg913244#msg913244 date=1235752084]
    [quote author=ejmat link=topic=50707.msg913216#msg913216 date=1235749864]
    [quote author=oaklandzoo24 link=topic=50707.msg913212#msg913212 date=1235749676]
    "Nate Washington has always been a enigma to Steelers fans. Some (like me) have always had a (maybe unhealthy) fascination with his big-play ability. Other Steelers fans have been constantly frustrated by his tendency to drop passes."
    From that link.

    Isnt that exactly what we don't need?
    I'll tell you this.
    He catches more passes than TWill did.
    The Steelers are used to HInes Ward and Santanio Holmes that catch just about everything thrown at them.
    Nate runs a lot of deep routes which make it more difficult.
    screw that!!!.. we need a good route runner not another deep threat... plus he's not even that good...
    lol, ejmat, that is the weakest argument I have ever heard from you....
    He catches more passes than TWill did
    lmao, you had crack for b-fast again.
    LOL Proph.
    You know I did kind of think about that as my fingers were typing it yet I hit the "Post" button still.
    Seriously though I've watched Nate play his entire career with Pittsburgh and I can tell you he's a decent player than can make big plays.


    I will recant my TWill argument because it WAS one of the stupidest statements I have ever made.
    Thanks for keeping me on my toes Bleed and Prophet.
    Let me say this instead.
    If anything he is a huge upgrade over Bobby Wade and at this point Sydney Rice (since he has yet to prove himeself).
    Is that better?
    Better, but, once it's in the pp.o archives it is fair game to dredge, out of context, at any point in time for ammunition in some other worthless discussion.
    [/quote]

    Yes and I deserve that to be brought up later and used against me.
    I will shoulder any heat that comes from that statement.
    You know, if that's the only thing people can bring up against me after a little over 4 years I am doing pretty good.
    However this statement deserves to be put up in the "Dumbest Statements on PPO" thread.

    [/quote]

    Bro,I wont even begin to say the things you said about O. Smith
    [/quote]

    LOL>
    I don't remember exactly what was said but I do know I thought he was the best option at RB for a while.
    That may have been prior to the whizintor thing though.

  4. #74
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Vikings eyeing Nate Washington

    Here Marr

  5. #75
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re: Vikings eyeing Nate Washington

    "V4L" wrote:
    Here Marr
    Yea, I just checked my insider stuff on him....Damn Titans.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  6. #76
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Vikings eyeing Nate Washington

    http://www.thejetsblog.com/2009/02/26/free-agent-focus-nate-washington/


    Here ya go Marr

    Pretty much just a WR with some upside.. Still raw and improving

    If we go the vet route I want someone who can beat the jam and run the dink and dunk routes and not drop easy passes

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Similar Threads

  1. Dolphins beat out Vikings for CB Nate Jones
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-15-2008, 05:21 PM
  2. MERGED: Vikings eyeing Graham? (or Lelie?)
    By Ltrey33 in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2007, 05:21 PM
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-11-2007, 07:57 PM
  4. Ex-Vikings aide Cottrell eyeing league job
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-02-2006, 12:24 PM
  5. nate says vikings is reality!!
    By nareg in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 03-25-2006, 08:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •