Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 100
  1. #11
    slinkey is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    305

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    I like aceclowns idea of trading the two's for the 21st!

  2. #12
    Gift's Avatar
    Gift is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    811

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    "KJ" wrote:
    Worth it to just give away three potential playmakers and get just one potential playmaker? I don't think so. There's going to be an impact player at #17 and there's a lot of value in those second rounders.
    agreed
    http://www.purplepride.org/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=6169&dateline=1318052  159

  3. #13
    revprodeji's Avatar
    revprodeji is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    273

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    This is not the draft to do this, there is so much quality second round talent. Id rather keep the picks
    www.prodeji.mychoices.biz



  4. #14
    olson_10's Avatar
    olson_10 is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,215

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    dont move up...stay put with what we have
    People who see life as anything more than pure entertainment are missing the point.

  5. #15
    mattjenny3's Avatar
    mattjenny3 is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    223

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    Terrible idea. I've said before that (not like I came up with it myself) the draft is a crapshoot. #1,2 and 2 for one pick is crazy. Get three potentials because I'd bet not all of them work out, but our odds are better with 3 rather than 1. Top ten only means top ten teams need that position. Wasn't Aaron Rodgers supposed to be a #2 pick if not #1? He slid because of pre-draft circumstances for sure, but if a team really needed a QB besides GB he'd have been gone top ten. The only player worth the risk of 3 picks in this draft is Bush. And he's not even worth it in my opinion because of the HWalker fiasco.
    REDHORSE

  6. #16
    smootpepper is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    409

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    This years draft is deep with talent so I think it would be a mistake trading 1st and 2nd round picks just to move up and select a qb. If we need a qb this year I say trade our 1st for schwab and draft a linebacker and some oline help in the 2nd.

    But we do need to pick up a qb this year, or next year at the latest to groom since Brad prob will only play 2 years more tops.

  7. #17
    mackd10's Avatar
    mackd10 is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    58

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    The Packers have the number 5 pick and they would never trade with us.

  8. #18
    KJ's Avatar
    KJ
    KJ is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    374

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    "smootpepper" wrote:
    This years draft is deep with talent so I think it would be a mistake trading 1st and 2nd round picks just to move up and select a qb. If we need a qb this year I say trade our 1st for schwab and draft a linebacker and some oline help in the 2nd.

    But we do need to pick up a qb this year, or next year at the latest to groom since Brad prob will only play 2 years more tops.
    Charles Schwab?

  9. #19
    COJOMAY is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,005

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    Pat Kirwan recently said on the NFL Network that he talked to Childress and that Childress wanted to see what it would take to trade up. Kirwin asked what player he would trade up for and Childress said one of the top 3 QB's. I find it hard to believe that Childress would say something like after the organization has been so tight-lipped. Do you suppose it's some kind of smokescreen?
    Kentucky Vikes Fan

    When you require nothing, you get nothing; when you expect nothing, you will find nothing; when you embrace nothing, all you will have is nothing.

  10. #20
    smootpepper is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    409

    Re: Vikes have the value to move up to #5

    I figure if we need to invest in a QB that knows how to get future value for the team, charlies the man.

    If we only had him before we traded daunte.... maybe the phins would have included a money market fund with that 2nd rounder. :grin:


    or we can trade a 1st for Schaub.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Vikes tanking it to move to L.A.?
    By defensiveplaymaker1 in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-10-2007, 05:51 PM
  2. One less place for the Vikes to move to...
    By Ltrey33 in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-10-2005, 10:32 AM
  3. Wilf says Vikes won't move.
    By Caine in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-09-2005, 05:28 PM
  4. If Vikes move from MN will you still be a fan
    By RK. in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 12-14-2004, 07:58 PM
  5. Vikes worst move
    By Bohunk in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-19-2003, 01:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •