Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    PurplePowerPunch is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    456

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    8) We now have a legitimate two-headed monster in "CT" and "AD".
    I think the idea of a two back system works in the NFL, and is needed in order to get to the show.
    One huge step for the vikings this offseason guys.

    ALL DAY!!!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,196

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    "PurplePowerPunch" wrote:
    8) We now have a legitimate two-headed monster in "CT" and "AD".
    I think the idea of a two back system works in the NFL, and is needed in order to get to the show.
    One huge step for the vikings this offseason guys.
    Agreed.
    "CTAD" should be exciting to watch this season!
    Skol!
    Go Vikings!

  3. #23
    Billy Boy is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,426

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    "NeoVikesTX" wrote:
    "PurplePowerPunch" wrote:
    8) We now have a legitimate two-headed monster in "CT" and "AD".
    I think the idea of a two back system works in the NFL, and is needed in order to get to the show.
    One huge step for the vikings this offseason guys.
    Agreed.
    "CTAD" should be exciting to watch this season!
    C Tad run. C Tad score!

    30...20...10...TD!


    All the kids my age pee their pants, it's the coolest.

  4. #24
    digital420's Avatar
    digital420 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Ancient Korinthia
    Posts
    2,559

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    "Billy" wrote:
    "NeoVikesTX" wrote:
    "PurplePowerPunch" wrote:
    8) We now have a legitimate two-headed monster in "CT" and "AD".
    I think the idea of a two back system works in the NFL, and is needed in order to get to the show.
    One huge step for the vikings this offseason guys.
    Agreed.
    "CTAD" should be exciting to watch this season!

    C Tad run. C Tad score!

    30...20...10...TD!
    CT + AD = C A TD!!!


    DiGiTaL

    "We tried to stick with it, but there was a point where we were beating our head against a wall," Seattle Coach Mora talking about running at the Williams Wall

  5. #25
    PackSux!'s Avatar
    PackSux! is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,568

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    "digital420" wrote:
    "Billy" wrote:
    "NeoVikesTX" wrote:
    "PurplePowerPunch" wrote:
    8) We now have a legitimate two-headed monster in "CT" and "AD".
    I think the idea of a two back system works in the NFL, and is needed in order to get to the show.
    One huge step for the vikings this offseason guys.
    Agreed.
    "CTAD" should be exciting to watch this season!

    C Tad run. C Tad score!

    30...20...10...TD!
    CT + AD = C A TD!!!


    DiGiTaL
    I wanna C A whole shitload of td's out of them two.

  6. #26
    Prophet's Avatar
    Prophet is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    17,388

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    "UffDaVikes]" wrote:
    [quote]

    I'm not into the RBC either.

    I do know that I would rather have CT starting as the RB and AP getting his requisite carries in when CT is getting a breather rather than having 'glass shard' MeMo in there.
    MeMo should be sold for a box of ho hos, a draft pick, and a fresh cyliner of unflavored pringles.

    Regarding the original article, this quote cracked me up:

    “Just very preliminarily, that’s it,” Childress said. “Those guys will see the field and they’ll see the field together I’m sure at different points in time. It’s hard to see that right now. Can I imagine it? Yeah, I can imagine it, but it’s hard to see that right now just with this process starting today.”
    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  7. #27
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,572

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    "Prophet" wrote:
    [quote]
    "UffDaVikes]" wrote:

    I'm not into the RBC either.

    I do know that I would rather have CT starting as the RB and AP getting his requisite carries in when CT is getting a breather rather than having 'glass shard' MeMo in there.
    MeMo should be sold for a box of ho hos, a draft pick, and a fresh cyliner of unflavored pringles.

    Regarding the original article, this quote cracked me up:

    “Just very preliminarily, that’s it,” Childress said. “Those guys will see the field and they’ll see the field together I’m sure at different points in time. It’s hard to see that right now. Can I imagine it? Yeah, I can imagine it, but it’s hard to see that right now just with this process starting today.”
    Umm...ok then.

  8. #28
    nephilimstorm's Avatar
    nephilimstorm is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,184

    Re: Taylor - Peterson together

    This will be one nasty running game..and I hope T Jack will be able to throw and have is WR catch Lol

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. The Peterson-Taylor combination
    By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 06-19-2008, 11:53 AM
  2. Chilly on Both Taylor Peterson on MNF
    By purplepowered in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 12-20-2007, 10:18 AM
  3. Chester Taylor or Adrian Peterson?
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 10-14-2007, 05:57 PM
  4. Can Peterson beat Taylor for starting job?
    By singersp in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-18-2007, 05:28 AM
  5. Are Peterson & Taylor the new Maroney & Dillon
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-15-2007, 12:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •