Thread: Shiancoe has been talking to mcNabb

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094589

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094586

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094564

Womp womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Have I said of late, coaches coach, players play. By the way, there is another aspect to that little cliche'.......

Front office pukes add players to teams not players.

Yeah, because players have NEVER contacted another prospective player to give a good word about the team....:dry:

Good word, got it and agree.

Signed a player? Never.

Lol. Who is saying that shank is going to sign mcnabb? Even on this site, no one is thaaat dumb.

Originally Posted by "12purplepride28" #1094604

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094589

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094586

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094564

Womp womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Have I said of late, coaches coach, players play. By the way, there is another aspect to that little cliche'.......

Front office pukes add players to teams not players.

Yeah, because players have NEVER contacted another prospective player to give a good word about the team....:dry:

Good word, got it and agree.

Signed a player? Never.

Lol. Who is saying that shank is going to sign mcnabb? Even on this site, no one is thaaat dumb.

Which is my point. He can do all the talking he wants, but in the end, it means nothing more than womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094600

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

Again, got all that and agree. Why wouldn't a Vet TE want a Vet QB instead of a rook. Its football 101.

Not arguing that. Just saying it means he thinks McNabb is better than Webb, despite what some other people on this site might believe. Vet TE doesn't want a vet QB just because. He wants a good player who will get him the ball. If Webb was that guy, I bet he'd be all for Webb. Unfortunately, he is not.

[Womp womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Have I said of late, coaches coach, players play. By the way, there is another aspect to that little cliche'.......

Front office pukes add players to teams not players.

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Don't get me wrong, a few Vets telling another Vet how good it would be to see him in their uni is a good thing, but in the end, it will be the FO pukes (in this case) giving up the pick and the contract to get Dnabb, not Shanc on some talk show or in some twitter chat thingamajib.

Yes and no. As of now, any talk of McNabb is pure speculation. Teams can't contact players, we don't know if McNabb will be released, or if he'll be traded or what.

Also, the FO is smart enough to not listen to most of what players say. Washington knows if they dump McNabb, someone else will pick him up. Shank talking to him isn't going to drive up the price. McNabb can still play, there will be teams jumping all over him if he hits the open market.

Besides, if they had an issue about things Shank says, the FO would have told him to shut up by now. The past couple years he's always the one on the NFLN talking about the state of the VIkings.[/quote]
No they wouldn't have. They can't talk to the players right now, unless its related to a injury rehab or a rookie coming out of the draft.

And one more time, I hear ya about teams wanting Dnabb. My point is that Shanc's little discussion means nothing in the grand scheme of things.....

Just a bunch of womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah. As a wise man once said......

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Aren't you the one who is always telling us that our FO "pukes" don't have a clue because they didn't sign everybody and their mother to long term deals already?

Which is it?

Caine

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094607

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094600

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

Again, got all that and agree. Why wouldn't a Vet TE want a Vet QB instead of a rook. Its football 101.

Not arguing that. Just saying it means he thinks McNabb is better than Webb, despite what some other people on this site might believe. Vet TE doesn't want a vet QB just because. He wants a good player who will get him the ball. If Webb was that guy, I bet he'd be all for Webb. Unfortunately, he is not.

[Womp womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Have I said of late, coaches coach, players play. By the way, there is another aspect to that little cliche'.......

Front office pukes add players to teams not players.

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Don't get me wrong, a few Vets telling another Vet how good it would be to see him in their uni is a good thing, but in the end, it will be the FO pukes (in this case) giving up the pick and the contract to get Dnabb, not Shanc on some talk show or in some twitter chat thingamajib.

Yes and no. As of now, any talk of McNabb is pure speculation. Teams can't contact players, we don't know if McNabb will be released, or if he'll be traded or what.

Also, the FO is smart enough to not listen to most of what players say. Washington knows if they dump McNabb, someone else will pick him up. Shank talking to him isn't going to drive up the price. McNabb can still play, there will be teams jumping all over him if he hits the open market.

Besides, if they had an issue about things Shank says, the FO would have told him to shut up by now. The past couple years he's always the one on the NFLN talking about the state of the VIkings.

No they wouldn't have. They can't talk to the players right now, unless its related to a injury rehab or a rookie coming out of the draft.[/quote]
Umm... Shank has been a Viking for more than a couple months. He's been talking for years.

And one more time, I hear ya about teams wanting Dnabb. My point is that Shanc's little discussion means nothing in the grand scheme of things.....

And I'm saying they do? No. I'm simply posting a link. Read into it how they are. In fact, if you bothered to read my post, I said Shank talking to him does NOT change how the FO will look at the McNabb situation. If they want him, they'll go after him. If McNabb wants to come here, he will. If not, oh well.

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1094612

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Aren't you the one who is always telling us that our FO "pukes" don't have a clue because they didn't sign everybody and their mother to long term deals already?

Which is it?

Caine

Did I say they had a perfect plan?

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094619

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1094612

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Aren't you the one who is always telling us that our FO "pukes" don't have a clue because they didn't sign everybody and their mother to long term deals already?

Which is it?

Caine

Did I say they had a perfect plan?

You haven't since Childress was fired. I will vouch for that personally.

[quote="Marrdro" #1094598]

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094592

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

And what do you think that plan is? Pass on drafting a QB high in hopes of getting McNabb after the draft?

News flash! McNabb isn't a FA & there's no guarantee the Redskins will even trade him, let alone to the Vikings. We aren't the only team looking for a veteran QB.

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094618

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094607

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094600

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

Again, got all that and agree. Why wouldn't a Vet TE want a Vet QB instead of a rook. Its football 101.

Not arguing that. Just saying it means he thinks McNabb is better than Webb, despite what some other people on this site might believe. Vet TE doesn't want a vet QB just because. He wants a good player who will get him the ball. If Webb was that guy, I bet he'd be all for Webb. Unfortunately, he is not.

[Womp womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Have I said of late, coaches coach, players play. By the way, there is another aspect to that little cliche'.......

Front office pukes add players to teams not players.

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Don't get me wrong, a few Vets telling another Vet how good it would be to see him in their uni is a good thing, but in the end, it will be the FO pukes (in this case) giving up the pick and the contract to get Dnabb, not Shanc on some talk show or in some twitter chat thingamajib.

Yes and no. As of now, any talk of McNabb is pure speculation. Teams can't contact players, we don't know if McNabb will be released, or if he'll be traded or what.

Also, the FO is smart enough to not listen to most of what players say. Washington knows if they dump McNabb, someone else will pick him up. Shank talking to him isn't going to drive up the price. McNabb can still play, there will be teams jumping all over him if he hits the open market.

Besides, if they had an issue about things Shank says, the FO would have told him to shut up by now. The past couple years he's always the one on the NFLN talking about the state of the VIkings.

No they wouldn't have. They can't talk to the players right now, unless its related to a injury rehab or a rookie coming out of the draft.

Umm... Shank has been a Viking for more than a couple months. He's been talking for years.

And one more time, I hear ya about teams wanting Dnabb. My point is that Shanc's little discussion means nothing in the grand scheme of things.....

And I'm saying they do? No. I'm simply posting a link. Read into it how they are. In fact, if you bothered to read my post, I said Shank talking to him does NOT change how the FO will look at the McNabb situation. If they want him, they'll go after him. If McNabb wants to come here, he will. If not, oh well.[/quote]

Except you're wrong! If McNabb says he won't play for the Panthers, they won't trade him there. So if he says he wants to play for Minn, chances are we might be in the running. Kinda like the Houshyahmomma deal. How does a player know he wants to play for a certain organization? Other Vets and the talent on the team.

Originally Posted by "kevoncox" #1094719

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094618

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094607

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1094600

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1094598

Again, got all that and agree. Why wouldn't a Vet TE want a Vet QB instead of a rook. Its football 101.

Not arguing that. Just saying it means he thinks McNabb is better than Webb, despite what some other people on this site might believe. Vet TE doesn't want a vet QB just because. He wants a good player who will get him the ball. If Webb was that guy, I bet he'd be all for Webb. Unfortunately, he is not.

[Womp womp womp womp, blah blah blah blah.

Have I said of late, coaches coach, players play. By the way, there is another aspect to that little cliche'.......

Front office pukes add players to teams not players.

The front office pukes have a plan and they don't need Shanc to execute it.

Don't get me wrong, a few Vets telling another Vet how good it would be to see him in their uni is a good thing, but in the end, it will be the FO pukes (in this case) giving up the pick and the contract to get Dnabb, not Shanc on some talk show or in some twitter chat thingamajib.

Yes and no. As of now, any talk of McNabb is pure speculation. Teams can't contact players, we don't know if McNabb will be released, or if he'll be traded or what.

Also, the FO is smart enough to not listen to most of what players say. Washington knows if they dump McNabb, someone else will pick him up. Shank talking to him isn't going to drive up the price. McNabb can still play, there will be teams jumping all over him if he hits the open market.

Besides, if they had an issue about things Shank says, the FO would have told him to shut up by now. The past couple years he's always the one on the NFLN talking about the state of the VIkings.

No they wouldn't have. They can't talk to the players right now, unless its related to a injury rehab or a rookie coming out of the draft.

Umm... Shank has been a Viking for more than a couple months. He's been talking for years.

And one more time, I hear ya about teams wanting Dnabb. My point is that Shanc's little discussion means nothing in the grand scheme of things.....

And I'm saying they do? No. I'm simply posting a link. Read into it how they are. In fact, if you bothered to read my post, I said Shank talking to him does NOT change how the FO will look at the McNabb situation. If they want him, they'll go after him. If McNabb wants to come here, he will. If not, oh well.

Except you're wrong! If McNabb says he won't play for the Panthers, they won't trade him there. So if he says he wants to play for Minn, chances are we might be in the running. Kinda like the Houshyahmomma deal. How does a player know he wants to play for a certain organization? Other Vets and the talent on the team.[/quote]

My point was that players who AREN"T McNabb traded won't have much of an effect on what happens.

McNabb has 4 years left, the Skins are well within their rights to trade him to the Panthers, and there's likely nothing McNabb can do about it unless there's something included in his contract. (ala Favre and the Jets)