Page 11 of 37 FirstFirst ... 910111213 21 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 366
  1. #101
    Euphman06 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    525

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    Purplecobras... Just by the mere fact that you took the time to come on here and post pathetic arguments it shows that YOU ARE A WHINER. You can't get mad at a genious for being able to find a loop in the system and kick the seachickens jiggly loose butt holes with it. Plus it doesn't show good character to come back and offer the same kind of contract to a player that isn't even worth a third of it just to rub it in our faces. Burly is easy to let go, and what do you get?? A loss of a third round draft pick, and the best lineman in the game. You be proud of yourself, just remember that pride is a sin as well. Good luck next season, I hope your team can keep it together.

  2. #102
    jdvike's Avatar
    jdvike is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,440

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    You got burned when you didnt franchise Hutch...this is just a copycat burn and not very original at that!!

  3. #103
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    "PURPLECOBRAS" wrote:
    "jdvike" wrote:
    "PURPLECOBRAS" wrote:
    "jdvike" wrote:
    "PURPLECOBRAS" wrote:
    Quote Originally Posted by shawn9876uss
    He is not worth 49 million dollars, no way in hell
    Why has nobody answered this question? Everyone is quick to name call but look in the mirror first and remeber your team is the one most other fans find comedy in
    I dunno...I found the way that the Vikes stoled Hutch very amusing!! :lol:
    Stoled? You must be a Viqueens fan!!!!
    Ohhh geez that hurt :wink:
    If you are pointing out a one of my typos then you better go back and check your posts before you go there chumpstain
    Sure its one thing to make a typo,stoled is bad grammer not a simple typo hillbilly
    Are you still mad because we took your all pro guard? Poor Seahawkes fan!
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  4. #104
    Euphman06 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    525

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    Stoled is not bad grammer, it's not even a word.. Therefore making it a typo...

  5. #105
    jdvike's Avatar
    jdvike is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,440

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    "PURPLECOBRAS" wrote:
    "jdvike" wrote:
    "PURPLECOBRAS" wrote:
    "jdvike" wrote:
    "PURPLECOBRAS" wrote:
    Quote Originally Posted by shawn9876uss
    He is not worth 49 million dollars, no way in hell
    Why has nobody answered this question? Everyone is quick to name call but look in the mirror first and remeber your team is the one most other fans find comedy in
    I dunno...I found the way that the Vikes stoled Hutch very amusing!! :lol:
    Stoled? You must be a Viqueens fan!!!!
    Ohhh geez that hurt :wink:
    If you are pointing out a one of my typos then you better go back and check your posts before you go there chumpstain
    Sure its one thing to make a typo,stoled is bad grammer not a simple typo hillbilly
    Ohhhh geeez how old are you anyway??
    Your arguments are so weak,so attack my grammer....OMG I dont know if I can go on after that shot :cry:

  6. #106
    Skyliner is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    83

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    And the really winner here is Nate. He had a 1000 yds two years ago, which was really inflated because of big games aganist terrible secondaries and seahawks not only overpay but lose a 3rd pick. Now, he gets handed the number 2 spot in Seattle where as in Minnesota he would have had to battle off Taylor and Troy.

  7. #107
    Euphman06 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    525

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    I think most of us "get" it... But come on.. 49 mill for Burleson?? That's just stupidity by the seahawks especially since he is a disposable player in reality. Yeah he shows talent, but that one year he did show talent it was along side of Moss. He made one great TD catch this past season. So if you think that is worth 49 mill. than go ahead, lose a draft pick. Do you even need a wideout? I'm really not sure what your situation is. You have fun with Burly, and when he doesn't pan out for you, go ahead and cry and get mad at the Vikes even more. If you are representative of the Seahawks fan base... than I can understand why krob was drinking so much. Have fun with your dillusion of having another super bowl year. Good luck

  8. #108
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    PURPLECOBRAS is a previously banned troll.

    He is banned again and I will deleting all of his posts.

    So, let him have it!

    :razz:

  9. #109
    Natedogg is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    22

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    Our organization deliberitly gave Burleson a low ball offer so we could get a third round pick for him. We're glad to get it, and $49 million is outrages for a player like Burleson. I loved him, and he did make some amazing plays, but he was so inconsistent his entire carrer except for a few games in 2004. He has a lot of potential, and I'd rather have the draft pick.

  10. #110
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Match Seahawks offer on Nate?

    I like Nate...but not 49 million worth of like! Good luck in Seattle, Nate! Have a good life!
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

Page 11 of 37 FirstFirst ... 910111213 21 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Raonall Smith signed by Rams
    By ThePurplePotato in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 02:22 AM
  2. I want to know what people think about Raonall Smith?
    By finnishvikingsfan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-10-2005, 09:44 PM
  3. Raonall Smith will he play again?
    By whackthepack in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-04-2004, 09:10 PM
  4. What's with Raonall Smith?
    By eelpout72 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-25-2004, 12:59 AM
  5. Raonall Smith
    By VikingsTw in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-09-2004, 08:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •