-
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
an interesting idea, I'm taking the top 20 players in pre-draft rankings, and see how they turned out. See whether pre-draft rankings are worth putting alot of faith in, or are they just a bunch of bums like us spewing crap. Well lets see and find out.
Going to find the number of busts in each group. Lets begin at 2007, that's long enough ago that we can get a decent idea of who will and who won't pan out
April 26, 2007:
Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech
Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconsin
Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma
JaMarcus Russell, QB, LSU
Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame
Patrick Willis, LB, Ole Miss
Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson
LaRon Landry, S, LSU
Amobi Okoye, DT, Louisville
Alan Branch, DT, Michigan
Darrelle Revis, CB, Pitt
Jamaal Anderson, DE, Arkansas
Marshawn Lynch, RB, Cal
Leon Hall, CB, Michigan
Robert Meachem, WR, Tennessee
Levi Brown, OT, Penn St.
Eric Wright, CB, UNLV
Michael Griffin, S, Texas
Joe Staley, OT, Central Michigan
Dwayne Jarrett, WR, USC
So I count 5 busts, and alot of players who are not worth what would be a top-20 pick IMO. Guys like Okoye, Lynch, Meachem come to mind. But I have 5 truly bad players. (Gaines Adams is a tough one, he was a good player, but he died. Just like how people call Udeze a bust, unfortunate, but I've got to put him there)
April 24, 2006 (One of my favourites)
Reggie Bush, RB, USC
Matt Leinart, QB, USC
D'Brickashaw Ferguson, OT, Virginia
Mario Williams, DE, North Carolina St.
A.J. Hawk, LB, Ohio St.
DeAngelo Williams, RB, Memphis
Vernon Davis, TE, Maryland
Haloti Ngata, DT, Oregon
Brodrick Bunkley, DT, Florida St.
Michael Huff, CB, Texas
Manny Lawson, DE, North Carolina St.
Santonio Holmes, WR, Ohio St.
Vince Young, QB, Texas
Jay Cutler, QB, Vanderbilt
Kamerion Wimbley, DE, Florida St.
Tye Hill, CB, Clemson
Jonathan Joseph, CB, South Carolina
Eric Winston, OT, Miami
Chad Greenway, LB, Iowa
LenDale White, RB, USC
I count 6 true busts, and a number of players questionable for top-20 talent. (AJ Hawk, Cutler, Joseph)
2005 (our favourite year)
Alex Smith
Braylon Edwards
Aaron Rodgers
Ronnie brown
Carnell williams
Antrel Rolle
Cedric Benson
Mike Williams
Derrick Johnson
Shawne Merriman
Troy Williamson
Marcus Spears
Alex Barron
Erasmus James
Adam Jones
Travis Johnson
David Pollack
Jamaal Brown
Mark Clayton
9 busts, and another 2-3 players who aren't complete busts, but shouldn't be top-20 guys (Brown, Caddy, Edwards), and there's Merriman..
so for the last three years, i consider there to be 20/60 true busts, with another 10 or so decent-at-best players.
Perhaps later I'll do some previous years as well, but that's a start. 1 out of every 3 of the "top 20" players it seems will bust.
Looks like even more proof, you should draft by what player you think best fits what you need, rather than go by the rankings.
And yes Marty, i still think we should have grabbed McCoy, I know you're going to go there

-
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
I wouldnt call David Pollack a bust, he was struck by injury and almost paralysed and retired - but he was a very good player..
With that said - it is really hard to get into these players brains and see how they will adapt to the speed on the NFL, i think that a good portion of background work and a good teamwork between coordinators, head coach and front office guys is what is essential in order to avoid mistakes.. Don't fall in love with measurables and get your confidence get you in a mindset that you can coach this players flaws away, because most of the times - you can't..
----
PUT IN JACKSON!
-
03-07-2011, 05:53 PM #3
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
I wasn't to far off when I said that my initial thought would be that QB's and WR's would be the biggest busts.
Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1090894
As to your ratings....
Benson. I think he did fine as a Bengal but didn't work out as a Bore even though, when he was a Bore, he was very productive. They just opted not to sign him.
Lendale White is another one who was productive in a system that fit his skill set but sucked when used wrong.
Pacman is another one I wouldn't label a bust from a production standpoint. He was very productive. Problem was his off field issues.
Jarrett. I'm giving you that one, only want to mention how many wanted him instead of Rice. Still cracks me up how many touted him as a "Beast".
There ya go again. Trying to read my mind. I can't even read my mind.......Why would you try?B)And yes Marty, i still think we should have grabbed McCoy, I know you're going to go there
Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
03-07-2011, 05:58 PM #4
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
I don't think there are very many staffs that rely on measurables.
Originally Posted by "skum" #1090906
I think Mayock said it best when talking about measuurables, "It causes you to go back and look at the tape, to see if you missed something if someone does a workout at the combine that exceeds (or doesn't measure up to) what you initially saw on tape".
The real benifit from the combine, isn't the measurables anyways. Its the first look the staffs have of guys being coached by pro coaches as well as first time they have a chance to go one on one with them.
Helps narrow down who they will have in for a visit.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
He really only had one real good year that would warrant a top-20 pick, and his attitude was a big issue. Being a bust doesn't just mean not being skilled enough. Career injury, arrests, etc. all play into it. Guy had a 3.5 yard average last season and 1111 yards. and equally mediocre to worse stats the rest of his career. Not worth of a top-5 pick in the draft
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1090919
I wouldn't even say he produced. He was big, so they used him near the goalline, racked up decent TD's, but that's about it. He hd two good years. one had 1100 yards (poor average though), and 7 TD. Anothe rhe had 700ish and 15 TD(pretty damn good) other than that though, not much, and you have to wonder why he didn't play a game at all last season if he was actually anything more than a troubled short-yardage back.Lendale White is another one who was productive in a system that fit his skill set but sucked when used wrong.
exactly. When you can't be relied on to actually be allowed to play, you count as a bust.Pacman is another one I wouldn't label a bust from a production standpoint. He was very productive. Problem was his off field issues.
In college he was a "beast" Again, some guys wanted him, some didn't. Just like some other players that come to mind. Anothe rexample of how nfl scouts don't always know allJarrett. I'm giving you that one, only want to mention how many wanted him instead of Rice. Still cracks me up how many touted him as a "Beast".
-
03-07-2011, 06:13 PM #6
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
Benson was quite a bust here. 4th pick in the draft.The Bores traded Thomas Jones, who was productive here, to make Benson the feature back. Unfortunately he wasn't as good as Thomas Jones. Couple that with the whining about the vets hitting him too hard in practice, picking on him and his off field issues(drinking) and he was gladly ushered out the door.
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1090919
Why must you defend everything this FO does....to the point of making your self look like a yes man.
-
03-07-2011, 07:55 PM #7
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
I think you should look at this from the perspective of what value did the team making the pick get vs. the dollars they spent on the player over their initial contract. That is, compare what you paid the rookie over his 4-5 year contract vs. a vet getting the same salary.
A number of the players that you list as busts, actually have been pretty productive NFL players. I would judge them against what teams had to pay them in salary and rank them against other players getting paid similar dollars. For the first 10 picks, the rookie salaries rank them pretty high in their respective positions so I think you are fair in ranking them against the best players in the league. For the bottom 10 (not a defined line mind you), their salaries put them down a few notches compared to what they could have got from a vet with equal salaries.
The idea of building from the draft is not just to have younger, hopefully career team players, but to get better production for lesser money. Certain positions like QB and WR that have longer natural learning curves, make them that much harder to pick in the first 10 picks with the salaries that are currently being given out.
If they do lower rookie salaries in the new CBA, the way you judge a bust needs to be re-evaluated. It will greatly change the landscape of the draft if you take a $5-10M/yr rookie contract down to $2-3M/yr and reduce the length of the average contract down from 5 years to 3 years.
-
03-07-2011, 07:56 PM #8
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
Interesting idea for a thread. Who's pre-draft ranking did you use?
I would be more interested to know how close pre-draft rankings predict who will be drafted where(that's what I thought when i read the title).
BTW, Reggie Bush was not a bust. Maybe didn't live up to the hype but he's been a productive player all 5 years in the league, and helped his team win a superbowl.
-
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
Yes, but the point of being a bust is not living up to the hype.
Originally Posted by "tastywaves" #1090926
Reggie bush is an example. Fora guy who was touted to be the next greatest thing since Barry Sanders, he's been a massive bust and overpaid punt returner. However, if he were a 6th round pick, I'd say that's pretty damn good value.
By your reasoning, the only way to be a bust on this list is to be out of the NFL, or not contributing whatsoever.
[qoute]
A number of the players that you list as busts, actually have been pretty productive NFL players. I would judge them against what teams had to pay them in salary and rank them against other players getting paid similar dollars. For the first 10 picks, the rookie salaries rank them pretty high in their respective positions so I think you are fair in ranking them against the best players in the league. For the bottom 10 (not a defined line mind you), their salaries put them down a few notches compared to what they could have got from a vet with equal salaries.[/quote]
Again, all depends on how you define bust. When you have a very high pick, you expect a very good player. When you get mediocre to bad talent, that's a bust.
Not always the case. Look at the Packers, they've got the highest payroll in the NFCN. They've got some expensive draft picks, and guys who will be re-signing for big bucks.The idea of building from the draft is not just to have younger, hopefully career team players, but to get better production for lesser money. Certain positions like QB and WR that have longer natural learning curves, make them that much harder to pick in the first 10 picks with the salaries that are currently being given out.
-
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
Very debatable. Again, as a guy who was supposed to be the greatest thing to happen to the NFL, that people actually thought rules should be bent just to accomodate him, he's been a below average runningback, and a good punt returner. Good punt returners can be had much later on in the draft. Josh Cribbs, Devin Hester, etc. all were not #2 overall picks, but are just as good, if not better. I'd even say Hester is a better receiver than Bush is a runningback.
Originally Posted by "jmcdon00" #1090927

Similar Threads
-
Pre-Draft Rankings.. Reliable or BS?
By i_bleed_purple in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 03-07-2011, 04:57 PM -
Updated draft rankings by position
By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 01-29-2008, 06:55 PM -
2007 NFL Draft prospect rankings: 1 - 500
By Prophet in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 04-17-2007, 08:43 AM -
2007 NFL Draft prospect rankings
By Prophet in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 03-16-2007, 10:39 AM -
Scout NFL Draft Rankings
By COJOMAY in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 02-18-2007, 07:00 AM




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks