Please remember this when exhibiting man-love for Matt Cassell...

**Zeus** · 01-12-2009, 10:47 AM

....an interested and engaged Randy Moss will inflate ANY QB's rating, yards, TDs, potential, etc.

Just sayin'.

=Z=

**kevoncox** · 01-12-2009, 10:48 AM

"Zeus" wrote:

....an interested and engaged Randy Moss will inflate ANY QB's rating, yards, TDs, potential, etc.

Just sayin'.

=Z=

Cassell is the future. He will be almost as big as Romo and Derek Anderson were this season.

**Zeus** · 01-12-2009, 10:55 AM

"kevoncox" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

....an interested and engaged Randy Moss will inflate ANY QB's rating, yards, TDs, potential, etc.

Just sayin'.

Cassell is the future. He will be almost as big as Romo and Derek Anderson were this season.

Wow.
A choke-artist who can't take a talented team to the playoffs and a complete failure who was benched for an untested 2nd-year guy.

That's great company to be in.

If you're pushing for Cassell, you'll need better examples than that.

=Z=

**bleedpurple** · 01-12-2009, 10:55 AM

"kevoncox" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

....an interested and engaged Randy Moss will inflate ANY QB's rating, yards, TDs, potential, etc.

Just sayin'.

=Z=

Cassell is the future. He will be almost as big as Romo and Derek Anderson were this season.

i agree, however, i gotta go to bat for D.A.
He was benched bc braylon couldn't hold onto the ball.... he's a better QB that what ppl are giving him credit for... I've watched him play numerous times this year and last year, and have come to realize he's a pretty good and young QB, better than Cassell, IMO, and Romo? well the jury is out on this guy....

**NordicNed** · 01-12-2009, 11:00 AM

I won't comment much on the Cassell topic, but I'll give my two cents worth and thats it...

Cassell only looked good at times, because of his supporting cast.........I'm not sold on the kid, and I definetly don't want the Vikings spending their cash on him.....

I'm suprised no one is looking at Carr.
Now Carr, I'de be very interested in....Period

**Mr-holland** · 01-12-2009, 11:04 AM

"NordicNed" wrote:

I won't comment much on the Cassell topic, but I'll give my two cents worth and thats it...

Cassell only looked good at times, because of his supporting cast.........I'm not sold on the kid, and I definetly don't want the Vikings spending their cash on him.....

I'm suprised no one is looking at Carr.
Now Carr, I'de be very interested in....Period

I have a big man love for Carr, we should have went after him when he was leaving Houston.

You know Cassel... i don't have a lot of problems with him. It al depends on how much we will have to spend. I really don't want to give him any huge contract or anything but it seems he'll want that

**ragz** · 01-12-2009, 11:18 AM

"Mr-holland" wrote:

"NordicNed" wrote:

I won't comment much on the Cassell topic, but I'll give my two cents worth and thats it...

Cassell only looked good at times, because of his supporting cast.........I'm not sold on the kid, and I definetly don't want the Vikings spending their cash on him.....

I'm suprised no one is looking at Carr.
Now Carr, I'de be very interested in....Period

I have a big man love for Carr, we should have went after him when he was leaving Houston.

You know Cassel... i don't have a lot of problems with him. It al depends on how much we will have to spend. I really don't want to give him any huge contract or anything but it seems he'll want that

why, cuz he had one half of decent play against the vikings?
last year he was terrible with carolina when he played, looking like he did for alot of what eventually had them giving up on him in houston.
do you wanna upgrade the position or do you just wanna pick up a guy and hope for a miracle?
jackson has shown just as much potential if not more than anything carr has ever shown.
so if you are just talking competition i wouldnt mind, but if you are actually talking about a no doubt starter, carr is far from that.

**ultravikingfan** · 01-12-2009, 11:32 AM

"kevoncox" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

....an interested and engaged Randy Moss will inflate ANY QB's rating, yards, TDs, potential, etc.

Just sayin'.

=Z=

Cassell is the future. He will be almost as big as Romo and Derek Anderson were this season.

Derek Anderson was big this season?

I thought he sucked and was benched for Quinn.

Must be a different Browns team I guess.

**Purple Floyd** · 01-12-2009, 11:33 AM

"Zeus" wrote:

....an interested and engaged Randy Moss will inflate ANY QB's rating, yards, TDs, potential, etc.

Just sayin'.

=Z=

So you are saying we should go after BOTH Moss and Cassell?

That would be cool.

**Mr-holland** · 01-12-2009, 11:35 AM

"ragz" wrote:

"Mr-holland" wrote:

"NordicNed" wrote:

I won't comment much on the Cassell topic, but I'll give my two cents worth and thats it...

Cassell only looked good at times, because of his supporting cast.........I'm not sold on the kid, and I definetly don't want the Vikings spending their cash on him.....

I'm suprised no one is looking at Carr.
Now Carr, I'de be very interested in....Period

I have a big man love for Carr, we should have went after him when he was leaving Houston.

You know Cassel... i don't have a lot of problems with him. It al depends on how much we will have to spend. I really don't want to give him any huge contract or anything but it seems he'll want that

why, cuz he had one half of decent play against the vikings?
last year he was terrible with carolina when he played, looking like he did for alot of what eventually had them giving up on him in houston.
do you wanna upgrade the position or do you just wanna pick up a guy and hope for a miracle?

jackson has shown just as much potential if not more than anything carr has ever shown.
so if you are just talking competition i wouldnt mind, but if you are actually talking about a no doubt starter, carr is far from that.

With the proper o-line the guy knows how to play football. He has the line in NY but not the starting QB position.