Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 61
  1. #11
    Slade is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,843

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do it?

    yeah, i'd take Hawk

  2. #12
    AngloVike's Avatar
    AngloVike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Sandhurst, UK
    Posts
    6,784
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do i

    Nope not interested in the slightest. Trading four picks like that to move up is not a good move IMO. I'd rather we settled for one of the so-called second tier QBs in the second round and used our first round pick to get a solid player.
    We can still pick up a good LB at #17 and get some depth in rounds 3 & 4 without trying to get at the #6 spot.
    Time spent annoying a Packer fan is never time wasted...


  3. #13
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do it?

    Yah

    Future QB

  4. #14
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,572

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do it?

    THe more I think about it I think it is a stupid idea.

  5. #15
    mnjamie's Avatar
    mnjamie is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,536

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do i

    Nope. The this Draft is WAAAAY to deep at many positions we need to trade up this year. Maybe next year we can trade up out of the 32nd slot.

  6. #16
    Slade is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,843

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do i

    "mnjamie" wrote:
    Nope. The this Draft is WAAAAY to deep at many positions we need to trade up this year. Maybe next year we can trade up out of the 32nd slot.
    ~ I like the sound of that :banana:

  7. #17
    jkjuggalo's Avatar
    jkjuggalo is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,131

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do i

    Take a risk and do it. The Vikings have never made a big impact on the NFL Draft (except by giving teams behind them their picks), and this would be huge. With the depth the Vikings have already I don't see why they should not trade up to get Hawk OR Cutler (no Young though). Like you said, they would still have a second and third anyway, so they really aren't giving up too much. They can not pass up potential superstars to draft more E.J. Hendersons and Marcus Johnsons or special teamers. PULL THE TRIGGER!!!
    Rock out with your cock out!!!

  8. #18
    VikingGuy43's Avatar
    VikingGuy43 is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    96

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do i

    "jkjuggalo" wrote:
    Take a risk and do it. The Vikings have never made a big impact on the NFL Draft (except by giving teams behind them their picks), and this would be huge. With the depth the Vikings have already I don't see why they should not trade up to get Hawk OR Cutler (no Young though). Like you said, they would still have a second and third anyway, so they really aren't giving up too much. They can not pass up potential superstars to draft more E.J. Hendersons and Marcus Johnsons or special teamers. PULL THE TRIGGER!!!
    Couldn't agree more. The past couple of years our 2nd and 3rd rounders have been linebackers that have turned out to be pretty weak (EJ, Dontarrious, Raonell Smith). I don't want another one of those, I want a maniac like AJ Hawk who could anchor our defense for years to come. Look what Urlacher did for the Bears D. There D has never been the same since he arrived. Hawk is that type of player.

  9. #19
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do it?

    They have been weak cuz of the coaching..

    And EJ is emerging and DT seems to be on his way

  10. #20
    viks_fan21's Avatar
    viks_fan21 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    644

    Re: Picks #17, 48, 83, & 114 get us to Pick 6. Want to do it?

    A.J. Hawk. I am in favor because we would still have a 1st rounder, a second, and a third. Any other year I would obviously say no.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Green Bay mayor picks Minn. RB with top fantasy pick
    By Zeus in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 12:52 PM
  2. PPO FF, plus Game Picks and Survivor picks. don't forget
    By NordicNed in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-04-2008, 05:48 PM
  3. Vikings Pick Up Four 4th Round Picks And Cash
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 07:18 AM
  4. Lions looking to deal No. 2 pick for more picks
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-26-2007, 07:13 AM
  5. Denver shopping BOTH first round picks for picks next year
    By brbitker in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-15-2006, 06:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •