Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11
    vikes2456's Avatar
    vikes2456 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,656

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "PurpleHornsOfDestruction" wrote:
    "vike_mike" wrote:
    Okay, let's say that you get a DE like Jamaal Anderson.
    So the defense is then pretty much set accept for MLB.
    It is not going to make a bit of difference if your offense can't score any points.
    What good does it do you to have the #1 defense in passing and run defense if your offense only scores 7 points every other game.
    Doesn't that sound familiar like last year.
    Without a doubt, you have to go after Calvin.
    Sydney Rice is not going to be there in the second round as Kansas City has been eyeing him for weeks now.
    I for one don't trust this eye thing with Troy.
    He has got to really show me this year that he won't push the ball away from himself when it is thrown to him.
    We will be looking to the defense to score the majority of points if we don't get that WR we need.
    Sorry, we have put ourselves in this situation.
    Time to do the right thing.
    Example: First start of TJack. @ Green Bay. How many 3 and outs there. Our defense dominated. Only points were by Smoot. We held them to 3 field goal one of which was game winning. But we lost because our offense couldnt get a frickin first down. Even if our defense is so superior like that every game we'll still lose because we dont commit with our offense.

    Wait I get it now.
    im sure Childress talked with TJack on their strategy. By getting so many 3 & outs and keeping that time of possession on there side we keep the offense on the field and they get tired and makin stupid errors.
    It all makes sense now.
    : : :
    Your point is made defunct by your overuse of
    :

  2. #12
    mr.woo's Avatar
    mr.woo is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,213

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "vikes2456" wrote:
    "PurpleHornsOfDestruction" wrote:
    "vike_mike" wrote:
    Okay, let's say that you get a DE like Jamaal Anderson.
    So the defense is then pretty much set accept for MLB.
    It is not going to make a bit of difference if your offense can't score any points.
    What good does it do you to have the #1 defense in passing and run defense if your offense only scores 7 points every other game.
    Doesn't that sound familiar like last year.
    Without a doubt, you have to go after Calvin.
    Sydney Rice is not going to be there in the second round as Kansas City has been eyeing him for weeks now.
    I for one don't trust this eye thing with Troy.
    He has got to really show me this year that he won't push the ball away from himself when it is thrown to him.
    We will be looking to the defense to score the majority of points if we don't get that WR we need.
    Sorry, we have put ourselves in this situation.
    Time to do the right thing.
    Example: First start of TJack. @ Green Bay. How many 3 and outs there. Our defense dominated. Only points were by Smoot. We held them to 3 field goal one of which was game winning. But we lost because our offense couldnt get a frickin first down. Even if our defense is so superior like that every game we'll still lose because we dont commit with our offense.

    Wait I get it now.
    im sure Childress talked with TJack on their strategy. By getting so many 3 & outs and keeping that time of possession on there side we keep the offense on the field and they get tired and makin stupid errors.
    It all makes sense now.
    : : :
    Your point is made defunct by your overuse of
    :
    no no its all good. the first
    : shows that the last paragraph was sarcasm. the second
    : shows that the sarcasm is sarcasm which of course is wrong so he had to put in another
    : to show that he was being sarcastic about the sarcasm being sarcasm. now if he had put another
    : in there it would be a whole different story.
    woo out
    just two corn cobs shy of a bushel

  3. #13
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "vikes2456" wrote:
    "PurpleHornsOfDestruction" wrote:
    "vike_mike" wrote:
    Okay, let's say that you get a DE like Jamaal Anderson.
    So the defense is then pretty much set accept for MLB.
    It is not going to make a bit of difference if your offense can't score any points.
    What good does it do you to have the #1 defense in passing and run defense if your offense only scores 7 points every other game.
    Doesn't that sound familiar like last year.
    Without a doubt, you have to go after Calvin.
    Sydney Rice is not going to be there in the second round as Kansas City has been eyeing him for weeks now.
    I for one don't trust this eye thing with Troy.
    He has got to really show me this year that he won't push the ball away from himself when it is thrown to him.
    We will be looking to the defense to score the majority of points if we don't get that WR we need.
    Sorry, we have put ourselves in this situation.
    Time to do the right thing.
    Example: First start of TJack. @ Green Bay. How many 3 and outs there. Our defense dominated. Only points were by Smoot. We held them to 3 field goal one of which was game winning. But we lost because our offense couldnt get a frickin first down. Even if our defense is so superior like that every game we'll still lose because we dont commit with our offense.

    Wait I get it now.
    im sure Childress talked with TJack on their strategy. By getting so many 3 & outs and keeping that time of possession on there side we keep the offense on the field and they get tired and makin stupid errors.
    It all makes sense now.
    : : :
    Your point is made defunct by your overuse of
    :
    no no its all good. the first
    : shows that the last paragraph was sarcasm. the second
    : shows that the sarcasm is sarcasm which of course is wrong so he had to put in another
    : to show that he was being sarcastic about the sarcasm being sarcasm. now if he had put another
    : in there it would be a whole different story.
    Let's not count the fact the Green Bay game was Tjacks first start.
    It was at Lambau field with a very slippery ball and ice cold weather.
    I don't think that had anything to do with the Vikings troubles that game
    ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

  4. #14
    PAvikesfan's Avatar
    PAvikesfan is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,037

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    so what this source is saying is:
    we are the onyl team not interested in calvin johnson...
    hmmm.
    way to be on point vikes.

  5. #15
    Hawkeye23's Avatar
    Hawkeye23 is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    186

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    ok i hear where your coming from on this but we still need to look at where the vikings are getting beat.
    The quaterbacks arent getting the max time to throw Griffin is just to slow.
    Leon Hall is amazing he ran a great 40 at the combine and had a great senior year this guy is a next nate clements (hopefully without the contract
    ) if we can get Quinn that would be best but i still think trading to the patriots we could get Chris Houston who is fast good at coverage and did an AMAZING 25 reps at 225 pounds at the combine.
    This guy can HIT those are oline numbers.
    nevertheless name the last good player the vikings drafted so. . . . .

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    652

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "ejmat" wrote:
    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "vikes2456" wrote:
    "PurpleHornsOfDestruction" wrote:
    "vike_mike" wrote:
    Okay, let's say that you get a DE like Jamaal Anderson.
    So the defense is then pretty much set accept for MLB.
    It is not going to make a bit of difference if your offense can't score any points.
    What good does it do you to have the #1 defense in passing and run defense if your offense only scores 7 points every other game.
    Doesn't that sound familiar like last year.
    Without a doubt, you have to go after Calvin.
    Sydney Rice is not going to be there in the second round as Kansas City has been eyeing him for weeks now.
    I for one don't trust this eye thing with Troy.
    He has got to really show me this year that he won't push the ball away from himself when it is thrown to him.
    We will be looking to the defense to score the majority of points if we don't get that WR we need.
    Sorry, we have put ourselves in this situation.
    Time to do the right thing.
    Example: First start of TJack. @ Green Bay. How many 3 and outs there. Our defense dominated. Only points were by Smoot. We held them to 3 field goal one of which was game winning. But we lost because our offense couldnt get a frickin first down. Even if our defense is so superior like that every game we'll still lose because we dont commit with our offense.

    Wait I get it now.
    im sure Childress talked with TJack on their strategy. By getting so many 3 & outs and keeping that time of possession on there side we keep the offense on the field and they get tired and makin stupid errors.
    It all makes sense now.
    : : :
    Your point is made defunct by your overuse of
    :
    no no its all good. the first
    : shows that the last paragraph was sarcasm. the second
    : shows that the sarcasm is sarcasm which of course is wrong so he had to put in another
    : to show that he was being sarcastic about the sarcasm being sarcasm. now if he had put another
    : in there it would be a whole different story.
    Let's not count the fact the Green Bay game was Tjacks first start.
    It was at Lambau field with a very slippery ball and ice cold weather.
    I don't think that had anything to do with the Vikings troubles that game
    ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
    Your sounding ALOT like Nadak Paul right now. Its not even funny how uncanny it is
    What about against the Rams. Well it was bad whether. No wait it was in a dome. Umm Maybe the sun was in his eyes. No wait dome again. then maybe the lighting was wrong or maybe it was too loud. ;D
    "Some Coaches pray for wisdom. I pray for 300 lbs. lineman. They give me plenty of wisdom"
    -Chuck Noll

    R.I.P. Sean Taylor

  7. #17
    skum's Avatar
    skum is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    2,884
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "cogitans" wrote:
    Nice find skum.

    But if you are bolding the 1st round prospect I think you missed a few. Though some of them are borderline 1st round, and definitely not for #7 I think the following of the listed players, should also be considered potential 1st rounders:

    Dwayne Bowe, Louisiana State
    Justin Blalock, Texas
    Ben Grubbs, Auburn
    Ryan Kalil, Southern California
    Amobi Okoye, Louisville
    Paul Posluszny, Penn State
    I meant picks who would make sense at 7th overall..


    ----
    PUT IN JACKSON!

  8. #18
    cogitans is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,403

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "skum" wrote:
    "cogitans" wrote:
    Nice find skum.

    But if you are bolding the 1st round prospect I think you missed a few. Though some of them are borderline 1st round, and definitely not for #7 I think the following of the listed players, should also be considered potential 1st rounders:

    Dwayne Bowe, Louisiana State
    Justin Blalock, Texas
    Ben Grubbs, Auburn
    Ryan Kalil, Southern California
    Amobi Okoye, Louisville
    Paul Posluszny, Penn State
    I meant picks who would make sense at 7th overall..
    I were wondering if that was what you meant.

    But then i saw that you had highlighted Jarvis Moss

    Thanks to PPE for the sig.

  9. #19
    skum's Avatar
    skum is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    2,884
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    "cogitans" wrote:
    "skum" wrote:
    "cogitans" wrote:
    Nice find skum.

    But if you are bolding the 1st round prospect I think you missed a few. Though some of them are borderline 1st round, and definitely not for #7 I think the following of the listed players, should also be considered potential 1st rounders:

    Dwayne Bowe, Louisiana State
    Justin Blalock, Texas
    Ben Grubbs, Auburn
    Ryan Kalil, Southern California
    Amobi Okoye, Louisville
    Paul Posluszny, Penn State
    I meant picks who would make sense at 7th overall..
    I were wondering if that was what you meant.

    But then i saw that you had highlighted Jarvis Moss
    His stock is going crazy..


    ----
    PUT IN JACKSON!

  10. #20
    bigbadragz's Avatar
    bigbadragz is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    823

    Re: NFL Team Interests, (Vikings included)

    well the article is only so accurate anyway cuz the vikes wouldnt wanna tip their hand.
    the year they drafted kevin williams he was no where on the radar until they drafted him.

    the vikes best option is to trade down if they can find a suitor and take a wr who would probably be a stretch if we stayed at 7.
    dewayne bowe looks like a beast.
    if that happens we can probably pick up another 2nd rounder depending on how far a team is moving up.
    in that case DE is deep enough to grab one in the 2nd round.


    this year's draft looks weak in the secondary and i saw leon hall get smoked by dewayne jarret in the rose bowl so i'm not sold on taking him number 7.
    and the one guy who posted the stuff about james coming back and udeze makes a good point.
    the vikes might feel comfortable with what they got.
    so unless they are madly in love with a DE we might be surprised and see them pass some up.
    LET THAT WHICH DOES NOT MATTER, TRULY SLIDE

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. House for sale, tomb included..
    By Johnson14 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-17-2011, 07:10 PM
  2. Childress silences naysayers (me included !)
    By StillPurple in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 05-01-2008, 08:18 PM
  3. Medical Risks For Vikings Interests
    By VikesfaninWis in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-29-2006, 01:53 AM
  4. Hobbies, Interests
    By WinonaVike in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 02:22 AM
  5. Vikings: Talks, Interests & Non-Interests
    By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-04-2006, 02:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •