Nate Clements Anyone????

**minnesotapride** · 03-01-2007, 08:04 PM

I think we should get nate in free agency.
Do what you have to get him.
Him and winfield would make great corners together on the field.
Both hard hitters and great all around athletes.
It would sure up our secondary and make our defense very good.
What do you think? Should we sign him? We have $30 million in space.

**Guruzen** · 03-01-2007, 08:22 PM

How about Eric Moulds and London Fletcher while we're at it? Why don't we just relocate to Buffalo?
;D

**VikingsTw** · 03-01-2007, 08:27 PM

I didn't relize Nate was available. I thought they resigned him or franchise tagged him.

CB is need and Nate is one of the better ones out there.

**ultravikingfan** · 03-01-2007, 08:34 PM

Heck yea!

That would be great to have him and AW back there.
2 OSU players in the secondary.

**PurplePlain** · 03-01-2007, 08:37 PM

"CB is need and Nate is one of the better ones out there."

I'd argue that he's the best out there so far in FA. Sign him up/

**Guruzen** · 03-01-2007, 08:38 PM

FA class is very thin this year, especially at CB. He's going to command a lot of money!

I think we have more pressing needs on offense such as our OL and WRs.

**Desertvikingfan** · 03-01-2007, 08:39 PM

He'll only be 28, he's a very solid player and having him Winfield and Griffin would look really good going into the season. And a pass rushing DE and we're on our way to a top 5 D

**VikingsTw** · 03-01-2007, 08:41 PM

"PurplePlain" wrote:

"CB is need and Nate is one of the better ones out there."

I'd argue that he's the best out there so far in FA. Sign him up/

I was talking about the NFL, not just free agency.

**ultravikingfan** · 03-01-2007, 08:42 PM

"Guruzen" wrote:

FA class is very thin this year, especially at CB. He's going to command a lot of money!

I think we have more pressing needs on offense such as our OL and WRs.

Where did our pass D rank last year?

Oh yea....dead last.