London Fletcher anyone?

**UndisputedVike** · 02-12-2007, 10:49 AM

Bills | Team not expected to re-sign Fletcher-Baker
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:49:49 -0800

Allen Wilson, writing for the Sporting News, reports the Buffalo Bills are unlikely to re-sign LB London Fletcher-Baker this offseason. Fletcher-Baker is eligible to become an unrestricted free agent.

If we don't resign Harris, Fletcher could be a great pickup if we don't go after or pickup anyone else. Fletcher has been one of the top LB's in the league and a tackling machine, after all we do have a Bills connection.,
;D

Del Rio · 02-12-2007, 11:15 AM

Don't know if you will see this since you have me ignored, but yes I would love to have London Fletcher on this team.

**Prophet** · 02-12-2007, 11:16 AM

"Del" wrote:

Don't know if you will see this since you have me ignored, but yes I would love to have London Fletcher on this team.

LMAO, how many people have you ignored?
Can you start a thread showing who is being ignored and by how many people?

**BadlandsVikings** · 02-12-2007, 11:21 AM

"Prophet" wrote:

"Del" wrote:

Don't know if you will see this since you have me ignored, but yes I would love to have London Fletcher on this team.

LMAO, how many people have you ignored?
Can you start a thread showing who is being ignored and by how many people?

I can't seem to see who you are talking to, do you have imaginary friends again?

**vike_mike** · 02-12-2007, 11:25 AM

No way, we can get a better MLB somewhere else ie; draft or other free agents.
Past his prime.

**olson_10** · 02-12-2007, 11:27 AM

im from st louis..he was a great player there, and even if hes older, would still be a great player here..if anything, im sure he wouldnt cost alot

Del Rio · 02-12-2007, 11:29 AM

Past his prime my donkey butt.

2006: 146 tackles 7 passes defended, 4 interceptions, 9 year pro.

Seriously age, prime, all that nonesense goes out the window when the guy that is on the table is WAY BETTER then what you have now and someone who can cover WR's, make 146 tackles is way better then anything we have.

We pass on at least attempting this then everyone in the front office needs to be shot in the knee caps.

**cajunvike** · 02-12-2007, 11:44 AM

"Del" wrote:

Past his prime my donkey butt.

2006: 146 tackles 7 passes defended, 4 interceptions, 9 year pro.

Seriously age, prime, all that nonesense goes out the window when the guy that is on the table is WAY BETTER then what you have now and someone who can cover WR's, make 146 tackles is way better then anything we have.

We pass on at least attempting this then everyone in the front office needs to be shot in the knee caps.

So why is Fletcher so good for us, but Donnie Edwards isn't?
>

**Prophet** · 02-12-2007, 11:45 AM

"cajunvike" wrote:

...So why is Fletcher so good for us, but Donnie Edwards isn't?
>

I was wondering why you hadn't jumped in with your DE chants yet.
The world is back to normal, I'm relieved.

Del Rio · 02-12-2007, 11:47 AM

"cajunvike" wrote:

"Del" wrote:

Past his prime my donkey butt.

2006: 146 tackles 7 passes defended, 4 interceptions, 9 year pro.

Seriously age, prime, all that nonesense goes out the window when the guy that is on the table is WAY BETTER then what you have now and someone who can cover WR's, make 146 tackles is way better then anything we have.

We pass on at least attempting this then everyone in the front office needs to be shot in the knee caps.

So why is Fletcher so good for us, but Donnie Edwards isn't?
>

Who said he isn't? I know I haven't.