Letroy Guion is making a big impression

**marstc09** · 08-09-2010, 05:51 PM

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Poor poor Marrdro. Just can't get it right. You really need to be more patient.

we don't have anyone on the roster that can/will take Phat Pats place in the scheme.
.

Maybe in your eyes. We have already been through this. We are fine.

Nope, we haven't been through this. You continually dodge the difference between the two positions. Your answer has always been that one of the 3 technique guys will fill the bill, especially JK, who by the way still wants to be a DE.

See the story about his trip to the Bills this year.

Never mind, I'm wrong, and have no clue about which I speak. LOL.

I am sorry do you know Jimmy? Didn't think so. You have no clue what he is thinking. He is playing well and most likely will be just fine with taking the starting spot. Probaly the reason why we did not draft a guy. LMFAO!

**Marrdro** · 08-09-2010, 05:55 PM

marstc09 wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Poor poor Marrdro. Just can't get it right. You really need to be more patient.

we don't have anyone on the roster that can/will take Phat Pats place in the scheme.
.

Maybe in your eyes. We have already been through this. We are fine.

Nope, we haven't been through this. You continually dodge the difference between the two positions. Your answer has always been that one of the 3 technique guys will fill the bill, especially JK, who by the way still wants to be a DE.

See the story about his trip to the Bills this year.

Never mind, I'm wrong, and have no clue about which I speak. LOL.

I am sorry do you know Jimmy? Didn't think so. You have no clue what he is thinking. He is playing well and most likely will be just fine with taking the starting spot. Probaly the reason why we did not draft a guy. LMFAO!

He isn't a 0 technique.
He definately doesn't want to be a 0 technique guy even if he could.
He is as old as Kevin.
We have Kevins replacement on the roster.

Need I go on?

**marstc09** · 08-09-2010, 05:58 PM

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

marstc09 wrote:

Poor poor Marrdro. Just can't get it right. You really need to be more patient.

we don't have anyone on the roster that can/will take Phat Pats place in the scheme.
.

Maybe in your eyes. We have already been through this. We are fine.

Nope, we haven't been through this. You continually dodge the difference between the two positions. Your answer has always been that one of the 3 technique guys will fill the bill, especially JK, who by the way still wants to be a DE.

See the story about his trip to the Bills this year.

Never mind, I'm wrong, and have no clue about which I speak. LOL.

I am sorry do you know Jimmy? Didn't think so. You have no clue what he is thinking. He is playing well and most likely will be just fine with taking the starting spot. Probaly the reason why we did not draft a guy. LMFAO!

He isn't a 0 technique.
He definately doesn't want to be a 0 technique guy even if he could.
He is as old as Kevin.
We have Kevins replacement on the roster.

Need I go on?

Did he say that? No.