Printable View
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=145175
Here's a link to his USC stats.....Not to shabby......
The biggest thing I noticed was, The KID Never Fumbles...
Not 1 fumble in 3 years, thats really something to me.....He knows how to hold onto the ball, thats for sure...
now compare them to reggie bush, why would anyone want bush over white? don't make sense. just cause bush runs fancy don't mean he's better.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=145158
white has way more touchdowns that bush does and people are so hyped up on bush.
and maroneys stats which are still better than bush.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=146107
White has more consistent stats. I wouldn't mind seeing either one of them on the Vikes, that's for sure.
i would take white or maroney over bush anyday
"collegeguyjeff" wrote:
White has the TDs because he got the ball when they got in close ... Bush's total yards destroy White and his YPC are better than White's by a long shot. Bush is also a MUCH better receiving back ... that is why people are so hyped on him. And Maroney's 2005 stats are NOT EVEN close to Bush's.Quote:
now compare them to reggie bush, why would anyone want bush over white? don't make sense. just cause bush runs fancy don't mean he's better.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=145158
white has way more touchdowns that bush does and people are so hyped up on bush.
and maroneys stats which are still better than bush.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=146107
Bashing Bush non-stop is just silly ... anyone who watched that USC team play knew who was the best player on the field.
I am not saying that White and Maroney will not be solid backs ... but to even suggest that they are better than Bush in college is ridiculous, especially when you obviously have the stats right in front of you.