Thread: Landry?

Colts, Steelers, Patriots

Recent superbowl winners who have at least one really good saftey

I'm all for Landry. Actually, he is #1 on my wishlist (besides CJ, but that is not realistic).

Landry and Blue!

"happy" wrote:

Colts, Steelers, Patriots

Recent superbowl winners who have at least one really good saftey

I'm all for Landry. Actually, he is #1 on my wishlist (besides CJ, but that is not realistic).

Landry and Blue!

Also, all Super Bowl winners have had a great water boy.

Thanks for the 35th different thread about Landry.
:

"Purplexing" wrote:

"happy" wrote:

Colts, Steelers, Patriots

Recent superbowl winners who have at least one really good saftey

I'm all for Landry. Actually, he is #1 on my wishlist (besides CJ, but that is not realistic).

Landry and Blue!

Also, all Super Bowl winners have had a great water boy.

Thanks for the 35th different thread about Landry.
:

Mystery of no SB rings solved.....we have always lacked a solid player at the water boy position.....I say we draft this guy in the first

[img width=400 height=311]http://www.tropiccomics.com/ebay/waterboy1.jpg[/img]

"Garland" wrote:

"hungryboy" wrote:

VIKES LOCKING ON LANDRY

Industry sources in the Minnesota area tell us that the Vikings are stongly believed to be planning to pick safety LaRon Landry with the No. 7 overall selection in the draft.

The Vikes, we're told, have a history of prepping the fan base for the actual pick, especially in years where the locals are clamoring for someone other than the guy the Vikes have targeted.

As we hear it, the fans want Adrian Peterson or Brady Quinn.
If Landry is on the board with either or both of them, Landry will be the pick.

The only guys who could get the Vikes away from Landry would be quarterback JaMarcus Russell and receiver Calvin Johnson.
Both are expected to be long gone by the time the Vikes pick.

As to the team's apparent infatuation with Russell, a reader has offered up this gem:
"Jamarcus would never get to use that cannon arm in Minnesota.
We don't have receivers that can catch, much less go deep for an 84-yard bomb.
The longest pass in this offense is three yards shy of the first-down marker."

link? Where is this from?

profootballtalk.com

I read the same article and just had to laugh at the last comment.........