Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47
  1. #21
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    Chester- Who knows how he will work out?
    Memo- Good back.. ALWAYS hurt though
    Onterrio- Verdicts out on him
    Bennett- Gone
    Moe- Not a starter.. Goalline back at best
    Echimundu- Not our starter back


    People are thinking we are super deep at back.. We really aren't.. I would be thrilled to get DeAngelo..

  2. #22
    norseforce's Avatar
    norseforce is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    149

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    yeah if we take deanglo willams were set at rb, chester and d-will would be great combo, people think were set t rb, with who ? ME always hurt MO AND ONTERIO puffin @ the back of the bus SMITH

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    281

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    It will be interresting to see what they do with their pick. Who knows, they may not even stay at 17. I think they should this is one of the deepest drafts in yeats. I do think we need a linebacker more than a runningback, but it is logical to take the best player available if you have no glaring holes. I do not think LB is terrible. And as many have said, there are alot of good linebackers out there this year.
    We can solve poverty today.

  4. #24
    DPep11 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    686

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    As long as we get the pick off in time, I'll be happy :lol:

    I have faith the coaching staff and front office have some sort of excellent plan

  5. #25
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    MeMo normally gets hurt when he carries the load so using him as a spot back he will be fine. The question is still out ofn Smith. True. However he is proven to be able to carry the load if needed. I think this is a situation where you give a guy another chance. Heck how many chances did the Yankees give Strawberry and Gooden?

    If Smith "blows it" again (pun intended) then I have no sympathy for him. I don't have it for him now either but it wouldn't be a bad idea to give him the chance. I am for getting the best athlete availoable but that doesn't always pan out either. Case and point - Dimetrious Unnderwood. We need to draft what the needs are. Point is we have more depth at RB than we do at LB. I don't think anyone here can argue that. We need a top notch LB to solidify this defense. Maybe even two. The need is much stronger at LB than RB.

    I'm not saying taking D-Will would be a bad thing. I'm saying our need is much higher to get a stud LB. Put aside what Smith has done. Not my favorite person because of it. However, he fits a need that we have and since we have him at not such a bad price, give him a chance. If we didn't have the strong hole to fill at LB than I would agree 100% with everyone.

  6. #26
    DaunteHOF is offline Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,096

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    i say take a LB but Childress might wanna rebuild this offense before the defense first.
    Its not braggin if you can do it!!!

  7. #27
    Freakout is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    "Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:
    DeAngelo would be awesome.. We need playmakers on O

    Get a LB in the second cuz there will be a ton of talented ones there still

    Abdul Hodge in the second
    Exactly.

    This guy will be everything we wanted Bennett to be. Blazing speed with the ability to make guys miss.

    Memo is a very average back and the jury is still out on Taylor. If you get the chance to get a star RB in the draft you take it.

    If Williamson develops imagine a defense having to defend against a RB and a WR that has 4.3 speed.

  8. #28
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    You don't draft for need when there are better players available. Chances are they likely won't contribute that much this year, so it isn't like they are going to fill our need immediately. There will be much better LBs in the second than there will be RBs.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  9. #29
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    Exactly yall

    The person we draft might not even play.. Go for best available

    And there is a ton of talent at LB.. Same can't be said for RB

  10. #30
    DarrinNelsonguy's Avatar
    DarrinNelsonguy is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,118

    Re: Kfan's first Mock... INTERESTING!!!!!!!

    You can never have enough good RBs!
    "Hard work beats talent, when talent doesn t work hard."

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. "Mock Drafts I Like/Find Interesting" Thread
    By Marrdro in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 170
    Last Post: 04-28-2011, 03:49 AM
  2. Interesting updated mock draft...Surprise pick!
    By KevinK in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-08-2010, 10:43 AM
  3. Interesting Yahoo Mock
    By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 09:47 PM
  4. KFAN's "Rube Chat"
    By COJOMAY in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-18-2006, 05:33 AM
  5. Ltrey's 'Mock' Mock Draft: Picks 1-17
    By Ltrey33 in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-30-2006, 06:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •