Thread: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
-
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
He is actually the QB I want us to draft if we wait until the 3rd.
-
04-14-2008, 05:30 PM #22
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"Marrdro" wrote:
Adam Shine and Solomon Wilcotts on SIRIUS NFL Radio, Channel 124...very cool Marr"ThorSPL" wrote:
The one with Adam Shine."Marrdro" wrote:
Which talk show did you call in to????I called into the satellite talk show today and discussed what they thought the Vikes will do at 17.
They believed the Vikes want to go with a OT at 17 but they believe the top 5 OT will be gone leaving the best value at Brohm.
Not sure I agree with them but it was a good discussion.
By the way, they chopped me off before I could as another question about Merling and his hernia.
Took almost an hour of holding to finally talk to them.
;D.
I was listening to the same show on Friday and a caller made the point that he "didn't see TJ as the answer."
They hammered him, asking if he thought there was enough evidence to make the judgment.
The caller said, "probably not, but, I just don't see it."
They talked about QB's and indicated then that "Brohm is the best WCO QB in the draft and that he would be a great fit for the Vikes."
Sounds like they might have gone down the same path with you?
I posted on Friday not to be surprised if the Vikes pick him...there is alot of chat about it all over the net, the radio, satellite, and TV.
We've always agreed that BPA is in the eyes of the drafting team...I absolutely will not be surprised if 4 or 5 OTs are gone, and, arguably, a DE may not warrant the #17 assuming Harvey is gone.
Definitely like Booty if available in the 3rd too...just have a feeling, contrary to the local press (and Chilly's comments) the Vikes are gonna take one of the top 5 QB's on their board.
Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent
----------------------------------------------
As a matter of fact, I do know
-
04-14-2008, 05:42 PM #23
Pro-Bowler
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 305
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
Ive seen him play.
Maybe a sixth rounder.
-
04-14-2008, 05:44 PM #24
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,051
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"slinkey" wrote:
you cant be seriousIve seen him play.
Maybe a sixth rounder.
Pissing on the Pack since 08'
-
04-14-2008, 05:48 PM #25
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"MaxVike" wrote:
My initial question was centered around the discussion of Brohm at 17 instead of a OT because of the McKinnie deal."Marrdro" wrote:
Adam Shine and Solomon Wilcotts on SIRIUS NFL Radio, Channel 124...very cool Marr"ThorSPL" wrote:
The one with Adam Shine."Marrdro" wrote:
Which talk show did you call in to????I called into the satellite talk show today and discussed what they thought the Vikes will do at 17.
They believed the Vikes want to go with a OT at 17 but they believe the top 5 OT will be gone leaving the best value at Brohm.
Not sure I agree with them but it was a good discussion.
By the way, they chopped me off before I could as another question about Merling and his hernia.
Took almost an hour of holding to finally talk to them.
;D.
I was listening to the same show on Friday and a caller made the point that he "didn't see TJ as the answer."
They hammered him, asking if he thought there was enough evidence to make the judgment.
The caller said, "probably not, but, I just don't see it."
They talked about QB's and indicated then that "Brohm is the best WCO QB in the draft and that he would be a great fit for the Vikes."
Sounds like they might have gone down the same path with you?
I posted on Friday not to be surprised if the Vikes pick him...there is alot of chat about it all over the net, the radio, satellite, and TV.
We've always agreed that BPA is in the eyes of the drafting team...I absolutely will not be surprised if 4 or 5 OTs are gone, and, arguably, a DE may not warrant the #17 assuming Harvey is gone.
Definitely like Booty if available in the 3rd too...just have a feeling, contrary to the local press (and Chilly's comments) the Vikes are gonna take one of the top 5 QB's on their board.
They agreed that they believe Spielman wants to take a OT at 17 but they are pretty sure that no OT or DE for that matter will be available at 17 that is worth picking there.
Thus thier feeling that based on pure value/BPA Brohm should be the man taken.
I will try to get through again later this week to get that followup question in that I wanted to aske them about the difference between a RDE and LDE.
;DMany many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
04-14-2008, 06:05 PM #26
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"Marrdro" wrote:
They'll say "In a cover 2, nothing.""MaxVike" wrote:
My initial question was centered around the discussion of Brohm at 17 instead of a OT because of the McKinnie deal."Marrdro" wrote:
Adam Shine and Solomon Wilcotts on SIRIUS NFL Radio, Channel 124...very cool Marr"ThorSPL" wrote:
The one with Adam Shine."Marrdro" wrote:
Which talk show did you call in to????I called into the satellite talk show today and discussed what they thought the Vikes will do at 17.
They believed the Vikes want to go with a OT at 17 but they believe the top 5 OT will be gone leaving the best value at Brohm.
Not sure I agree with them but it was a good discussion.
By the way, they chopped me off before I could as another question about Merling and his hernia.
Took almost an hour of holding to finally talk to them.
;D.
I was listening to the same show on Friday and a caller made the point that he "didn't see TJ as the answer."
They hammered him, asking if he thought there was enough evidence to make the judgment.
The caller said, "probably not, but, I just don't see it."
They talked about QB's and indicated then that "Brohm is the best WCO QB in the draft and that he would be a great fit for the Vikes."
Sounds like they might have gone down the same path with you?
I posted on Friday not to be surprised if the Vikes pick him...there is alot of chat about it all over the net, the radio, satellite, and TV.
We've always agreed that BPA is in the eyes of the drafting team...I absolutely will not be surprised if 4 or 5 OTs are gone, and, arguably, a DE may not warrant the #17 assuming Harvey is gone.
Definitely like Booty if available in the 3rd too...just have a feeling, contrary to the local press (and Chilly's comments) the Vikes are gonna take one of the top 5 QB's on their board.
They agreed that they believe Spielman wants to take a OT at 17 but they are pretty sure that no OT or DE for that matter will be available at 17 that is worth picking there.
Thus thier feeling that based on pure value/BPA Brohm should be the man taken.
I will try to get through again later this week to get that followup question in that I wanted to aske them about the difference between a RDE and LDE.
;D
;D
-
04-14-2008, 06:08 PM #27
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"jessejames09" wrote:
They'll say "In a cover 2, nothing.""Marrdro" wrote:
My initial question was centered around the discussion of Brohm at 17 instead of a OT because of the McKinnie deal."MaxVike" wrote:
Adam Shine and Solomon Wilcotts on SIRIUS NFL Radio, Channel 124...very cool Marr"Marrdro" wrote:
The one with Adam Shine."ThorSPL" wrote:
Which talk show did you call in to????[quote author=Marrdro link=topic=44047.msg758927#msg758927 date=1208202842]
I called into the satellite talk show today and discussed what they thought the Vikes will do at 17.
They believed the Vikes want to go with a OT at 17 but they believe the top 5 OT will be gone leaving the best value at Brohm.
Not sure I agree with them but it was a good discussion.
By the way, they chopped me off before I could as another question about Merling and his hernia.
Took almost an hour of holding to finally talk to them.
;D.
I was listening to the same show on Friday and a caller made the point that he "didn't see TJ as the answer."
They hammered him, asking if he thought there was enough evidence to make the judgment.
The caller said, "probably not, but, I just don't see it."
They talked about QB's and indicated then that "Brohm is the best WCO QB in the draft and that he would be a great fit for the Vikes."
Sounds like they might have gone down the same path with you?
I posted on Friday not to be surprised if the Vikes pick him...there is alot of chat about it all over the net, the radio, satellite, and TV.
We've always agreed that BPA is in the eyes of the drafting team...I absolutely will not be surprised if 4 or 5 OTs are gone, and, arguably, a DE may not warrant the #17 assuming Harvey is gone.
Definitely like Booty if available in the 3rd too...just have a feeling, contrary to the local press (and Chilly's comments) the Vikes are gonna take one of the top 5 QB's on their board.
They agreed that they believe Spielman wants to take a OT at 17 but they are pretty sure that no OT or DE for that matter will be available at 17 that is worth picking there.
Thus thier feeling that based on pure value/BPA Brohm should be the man taken.
I will try to get through again later this week to get that followup question in that I wanted to aske them about the difference between a RDE and LDE.
;D
;D
[/quote]
You know me, if they do I will educate them.
;DMany many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
04-15-2008, 10:20 AM #28
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"Potus2028" wrote:
yeah it makes me think too. i hope tj can step up but with a solid passing game a.d. will go nuts out there. i remember reading that the vikings will pick the best talent out there no matter what position.Sports Center Special!!!
John David Booty immediately mentions the Vikings as a team he would be interested in!
The analysts then went on to talk about how he would be a good back up if the T-Jack project doesn't work out....
I had been against drafting a QB, until just now... It makes me think.
do you think booty will last till the thrid round? i thought he was better then that.
-
04-15-2008, 11:44 AM #29
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
I hate the fact the Booty came from USC............
I'm prejudiced on that though.
-
04-15-2008, 11:49 AM #30
Re: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
"ThorSPL" wrote:
Better to have Boutte as a teammate than Booty.I hate the fact the Booty came from USC............
I'm prejudiced on that though.
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:LYoUF2py6M0J:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Boutte+marc+boutte&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us
LOLBANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
Similar Threads
-
John David Booty Has a Job, and I Never Have to Post About Him Again
By Marrdro in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 30Last Post: 11-02-2009, 12:22 AM -
Vikings Release John David Booty
By NodakPaul in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 58Last Post: 10-22-2009, 06:38 AM -
Vikes select John David Booty
By SharperImage in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 511Last Post: 03-24-2009, 06:06 AM -
What do yall think about John David Booty
By VirginiaViking8907 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 84Last Post: 01-22-2009, 05:39 PM -
MOVED: John David Booty wants on Vikes?
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 04-14-2008, 02:57 PM



Reply With Quote







Bookmarks