Thread: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
-
04-19-2006, 07:07 PM #1
if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
If the Vikings trade up we should not even consider vince young. Why? Because we need linebackers and Greenway is big, fast and a tackling machine. In order to be succesful you must draft to fill needs. Young would be great if we needed a QB as much as we do LBs. Look at the Steelers, each and every year they draft a positional NEED.
-
04-19-2006, 07:09 PM #2
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
Why trade up for Greenway? He will probably be there at 17. It is more likely that we trade DOWN for greenway
Make love to the present, fuck the past
--Sage Francis
-
04-19-2006, 07:11 PM #3
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
Ya we wouldnt trade up for any LB but Hawk IMO, becuz thier is alot of quality depth at LB. Greenway or Sims should be avaible at 17 anyway.

Theres NOTHING greater then a Florida Gator!
"I promise everyone this. When Childress is let go in two years I can honestly say this.
"I am not surprised"."-PurplePackerEater
-
04-19-2006, 07:12 PM #4
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
I'd trade up for Hawk. Greenway you can probably get at 17, but even that depends on where Sims goes. If Sims goes early, they might have to trade up a couple spots to get him if they really want him.
Proud member of PP.O since April 5th, 2003!
-
04-19-2006, 07:12 PM #5
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
DeAngelo Williams...next year's Offensive ROY!!!
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
04-19-2006, 07:13 PM #6
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
"cajunvike" wrote:
He wouldn't be if he played for the Vikings, who likely wouldn't give him the carries.DeAngelo Williams...next year's Offensive ROY!!!
I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.
-
04-19-2006, 07:18 PM #7
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
"Eyedea" wrote:
Agreed. Greenway is a reach at #17.Why trade up for Greenway? He will probably be there at 17. It is more likely that we trade DOWN for greenway
-
04-19-2006, 07:20 PM #8
GM
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,109
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
The only move the Vikings need to make IMO is trade our 1st round pick for SCHAUB!!!!!!!!!!!!!
there is absolutely no reason to trade up for a QB. That would mean we are giving 2 or 3 picks to move up and grab a QB when we could use only one pick to get Schaub. It would be as if we drafted Schaub ourselves with the 1st pick.
After that we plug the LB positions with 2 of the remaining 4 picks on the first day. As well as a CB and/or a RG.
I have seen time and time again how everyone on here says the LB group in this draft is very deep. So why move up for a LB when it's a deep draft for them?
-
04-19-2006, 07:27 PM #9
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
1st Round = Greenway
2nd Round 48th Pick = Tye Hill (If he's still there)
2nd Round 51st Pick = Brodie Croyle.
EDIT: Sims would be a higher prospect if he was taller but... Small LB's tend to suck at coverage.
-
04-19-2006, 07:28 PM #10
Re: if the vikes trade up-GREENWAY
LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY..
WE ARE IN GREAT SHAPE WITH ALL OUR PICKS!
LEAVE IT UP TO FATE.
Similar Threads
-
Bengals Trade Down--Vikes Next?
By LAVike in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 11Last Post: 04-20-2006, 05:47 PM -
Should the Vikes trade Culpepper?
By DefensivePlaymaker in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 8Last Post: 03-01-2006, 06:08 AM -
Vikes to trade up....
By Hawgski in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 78Last Post: 01-17-2006, 07:04 PM -
Vikes cut 19 and make a trade...
By Prophet in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 47Last Post: 09-05-2005, 12:49 AM -
VIKES-COWBOYS TRADE?
By arialassault84 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 08-29-2005, 05:46 PM



Reply With Quote









Bookmarks