Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    bsmithberkley is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    333

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    We pretty much see it the same way then...I am just looking for "the next differnt step". In fact, we may be a little closer than you think. Instead of going after a small, quick RB who can catch pases out of the backfield, I would prefer to have a credible inside runner who is adept at running routes and catching passes. It still emphasizes the running game, but, allows for more opportunities to create a mismatch in personnel.
    I think we want the same in a RB, you just like a cat I think is to injury prone.

    Change Hardesty's scouting report so that it shows alot of starts instead of injuries/not playing and we have our guy.

    Looking at another downfield pass catching TE and/or a FB with speed/pass catching ability would round out the line-up even more.
    Forget FB. Only 1 coming out this year that is even close to being draftable. Again, they are a dying breed.

    As to TE. Add another "inline" (Greshem/Grownkowski/Graham) guy who can block as well as he can run a route and I agree. Bring in one of the "Hybrid Recieve only" options and I don't agree.

    Maybe I am trying to squeeze too much out of the WCO scheme, but, it is nice that it can still be squeezed some more.
    Nope, squeeze away. The flexibility and unpredictability from your base, whether that be a 2 TE/2 WR/1 RB set or a 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB set, is what makes the scheme so great.

    As far as the average yd/catch going down last year, I contribute most of that to Berrians hamstrings and Favres slow start. I think they performed very well after they got going and should do even better if Berrian returns to form.

    Favre's arm isn't what it was when he was a spry young 35 year old QB, but he still has plenty of gas up to the 35 to 45 yard range.
    The did perform well, however, it was after BB's hammy healed and they started to use him on the shorter routes.

    As to the Noodle, comeon, humor me. Atleast side with me on one thing. The dudes arm is a NOOOOOOOODDDDDDDLLLLLE.
    Hoping Hardesty's injuries are behind him (perfect blend of skills). The only other backs I really like in the draft are Matthews-he will be gone earlier than I think we would be willing to spend a pick, Gerhart - If he falls to 3rd and if his hands are as good as scouting reports say they are, and Tate- could be worth it with a 4th rd pick especially if he is half as good as he says he is!

    Gotta agree that True Top End FBs and this year Top End TEs are hard to find. But

    And as a devout servant of "The Great Favre", I can not speak ill of the man...maybe if you were making fun of his "old man" legs I could agree :P ...the arm is just fine.
    None

  2. #12
    bsmithberkley is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    333

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    None

  3. #13
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  4. #14
    bsmithberkley is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    333

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    None

  5. #15
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    I don't consider BB a guy that I would want to rely on catching short stuff in traffic. Again, back to my point. Thats PH job mostly with a bit of the load being handled by El Syd.

    The fact that BB can go ahead and do it, catch the ball in traffic, to the degree that he showed last year was mildly suprising to me.

    Again, he is the piece to the puzzle that catches the ball without alot of traffic around him. Its not his fault the staff elected to not exploit the deep ball as much as it did the previous year.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  6. #16
    bsmithberkley is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    333

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    I don't consider BB a guy that I would want to rely on catching short stuff in traffic. Again, back to my point. Thats PH job mostly with a bit of the load being handled by El Syd.

    The fact that BB can go ahead and do it, catch the ball in traffic, to the degree that he showed last year was mildly suprising to me.

    Again, he is the piece to the puzzle that catches the ball without alot of traffic around him. Its not his fault the staff elected to not exploit the deep ball as much as it did the previous year.
    I have to disagree on that one, Berrian was the main reason you didn't see more downfield throws. His hammies kept him from being a downfield threat. Berrian has to be in "top form" to be effective downfield. He isn't going to "out rebound" a guy for the ball like sydney or have the sheer hustle/play making ability of a Percy Harvin, he relies on establishing seperation and then catching the ball. With his hammies tweaked last year he just didn't have the ability to do that.

    If he doesn't get his legs back he is an average WR at best.
    None

  7. #17
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    I don't consider BB a guy that I would want to rely on catching short stuff in traffic. Again, back to my point. Thats PH job mostly with a bit of the load being handled by El Syd.

    The fact that BB can go ahead and do it, catch the ball in traffic, to the degree that he showed last year was mildly suprising to me.

    Again, he is the piece to the puzzle that catches the ball without alot of traffic around him. Its not his fault the staff elected to not exploit the deep ball as much as it did the previous year.
    I have to disagree on that one, Berrian was the main reason you didn't see more downfield throws. His hammies kept him from being a downfield threat. Berrian has to be in "top form" to be effective downfield. He isn't going to "out rebound" a guy for the ball like sydney or have the sheer hustle/play making ability of a Percy Harvin, he relies on establishing seperation and then catching the ball. With his hammies tweaked last year he just didn't have the ability to do that.

    If he doesn't get his legs back he is an average WR at best.
    His hammies were an issue, however, not all year. Truth of the matter is, at least for me, you use the same hammies to beat your guy off the line and get into your route, regardless of how far you are gonna run.

    In the end, I believe the staff made a concerted effort to not stretch the field last year, however, that rationale is for another thread and I won't go into it here.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  8. #18
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,777
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    I don't consider BB a guy that I would want to rely on catching short stuff in traffic. Again, back to my point. Thats PH job mostly with a bit of the load being handled by El Syd.

    The fact that BB can go ahead and do it, catch the ball in traffic, to the degree that he showed last year was mildly suprising to me.

    Again, he is the piece to the puzzle that catches the ball without alot of traffic around him. Its not his fault the staff elected to not exploit the deep ball as much as it did the previous year.
    I have to disagree on that one, Berrian was the main reason you didn't see more downfield throws. His hammies kept him from being a downfield threat. Berrian has to be in "top form" to be effective downfield. He isn't going to "out rebound" a guy for the ball like sydney or have the sheer hustle/play making ability of a Percy Harvin, he relies on establishing seperation and then catching the ball. With his hammies tweaked last year he just didn't have the ability to do that.

    If he doesn't get his legs back he is an average WR at best.
    His hammies were an issue, however, not all year. Truth of the matter is, at least for me, you use the same hammies to beat your guy off the line and get into your route, regardless of how far you are gonna run.

    In the end, I believe the staff made a concerted effort to not stretch the field last year, however, that rationale is for another thread and I won't go into it here.
    based on our success with the deep ball, I'm gonna have to call bullshit.

    Sure, we didn't do alot of 9 routes, because Rice isn't fast enough to create the separation that Berrian did, and Berrian was pretty iffy the first while, but we had monster success running Harvin and Rice down the seams, then hitting him 30/40+ yards downfield. If thats not a deep ball, please explain what you define as deep.

  9. #19
    bsmithberkley is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    333

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    i_bleed_purple wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    I don't consider BB a guy that I would want to rely on catching short stuff in traffic. Again, back to my point. Thats PH job mostly with a bit of the load being handled by El Syd.

    The fact that BB can go ahead and do it, catch the ball in traffic, to the degree that he showed last year was mildly suprising to me.

    Again, he is the piece to the puzzle that catches the ball without alot of traffic around him. Its not his fault the staff elected to not exploit the deep ball as much as it did the previous year.
    I have to disagree on that one, Berrian was the main reason you didn't see more downfield throws. His hammies kept him from being a downfield threat. Berrian has to be in "top form" to be effective downfield. He isn't going to "out rebound" a guy for the ball like sydney or have the sheer hustle/play making ability of a Percy Harvin, he relies on establishing seperation and then catching the ball. With his hammies tweaked last year he just didn't have the ability to do that.

    If he doesn't get his legs back he is an average WR at best.
    His hammies were an issue, however, not all year. Truth of the matter is, at least for me, you use the same hammies to beat your guy off the line and get into your route, regardless of how far you are gonna run.

    In the end, I believe the staff made a concerted effort to not stretch the field last year, however, that rationale is for another thread and I won't go into it here.
    based on our success with the deep ball, I'm gonna have to call bullshit.

    Sure, we didn't do alot of 9 routes, because Rice isn't fast enough to create the separation that Berrian did, and Berrian was pretty iffy the first while, but we had monster success running Harvin and Rice down the seams, then hitting him 30/40+ yards downfield. If thats not a deep ball, please explain what you define as deep.
    I gotta agree, if Berrian was in shape to run those deep routes consistentley he would have seen more looks that way. I think the staff didn't want to take the "added risk" of losing BB for the season if they overworked him. With Harvin's Migraines "popping up" in the last half of the year when BB was getting better I think they just didn't want to take too many chances.

    I am looking forward to some 4 receiver sets next year so Berrian needs to be healthy and GLewis or a Rookie needs to be worked up by Favre this offseason.
    None

  10. #20
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916

    Re:How do our players match-up with WCO philosophy?

    i_bleed_purple wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    bsmithberkley wrote:
    I ho downgrade Berrian to below Average fit for the WCO.

    Prior to last year he only caught 52% of passes thrown his way.

    His "Big Year" he caught 51% of passes thrown his way.

    Last year he only got up to 60% with Favre, despite a significant number of short routes/slants.

    Bringing in a good receiver from the draft would not be a bad thing to push Berrian or even take his place in the line-up.
    I can't stress this enough, but when you look at positions like WR you need to look at them with respect to how they fit in the puzzle that is the position.

    You have to have a mix/match of players that can not only get off the line and get into thier routes, but you have to have a guy that can exploit certain areas of the field. PH is a good fit for the short to intermediate routes/El Syd is good for the intermideate to the longer stuff with a focus on areas were a possesion guy is important and BB is a good fit to exploit the stuff further down the field.

    Some on here have been very vocal about his lack of speed with respect to those types of routes, which I kindof agree with, however, he did lead the league in ypc avg in 2008 so he was beating somebody.

    In the end, I don't think you can look at percentage of catches alone when you look at a player as the deep guy will typically, in this scheme, see alot less opportunities than the other two. 55 catches out of 90 isn't that bad considering the types of throws you will typically see for his piece of the puzzle.
    The problem is that Berrian was getting fed a ton of short passes last year and only came away with 60% of the balls.

    If he was lengthening the field at a 60% catch rate that would be good, I agree. But I am afraid he will go back to that 50% range if he is in shape to stretch the field.

    Its not a "sky is falling" kind of thing...its more of a, if this guy does not improve we may want to explore other options kind of thing. With AD, Shank, Harvin and Rice pulling attention away from Berrian he should be much more effective than he was last year.

    Gotta keep the fire under these guy's feet to keep em at 100%...
    I don't consider BB a guy that I would want to rely on catching short stuff in traffic. Again, back to my point. Thats PH job mostly with a bit of the load being handled by El Syd.

    The fact that BB can go ahead and do it, catch the ball in traffic, to the degree that he showed last year was mildly suprising to me.

    Again, he is the piece to the puzzle that catches the ball without alot of traffic around him. Its not his fault the staff elected to not exploit the deep ball as much as it did the previous year.
    I have to disagree on that one, Berrian was the main reason you didn't see more downfield throws. His hammies kept him from being a downfield threat. Berrian has to be in "top form" to be effective downfield. He isn't going to "out rebound" a guy for the ball like sydney or have the sheer hustle/play making ability of a Percy Harvin, he relies on establishing seperation and then catching the ball. With his hammies tweaked last year he just didn't have the ability to do that.

    If he doesn't get his legs back he is an average WR at best.
    His hammies were an issue, however, not all year. Truth of the matter is, at least for me, you use the same hammies to beat your guy off the line and get into your route, regardless of how far you are gonna run.

    In the end, I believe the staff made a concerted effort to not stretch the field last year, however, that rationale is for another thread and I won't go into it here.
    based on our success with the deep ball, I'm gonna have to call bullshit.

    Sure, we didn't do alot of 9 routes, because Rice isn't fast enough to create the separation that Berrian did, and Berrian was pretty iffy the first while, but we had monster success running Harvin and Rice down the seams, then hitting him 30/40+ yards downfield. If thats not a deep ball, please explain what you define as deep.
    Couple of things....

    1. Yes, we did have some success with a few deep throws. That my friend, isn't exploiting the defenses when they stacked the boxes. Truth is, we had more deep throws that were incomplete than were complete.

    2. Rice isn't the guy that is supposed to stretch the field so why are you questioning his speed or ability to stretch the field?

    3. 40+ is the definition of a deep ball my friend, thats why its tracked that way on most stat pages.

    NFL Stats Page

    Statistically our ypc avg went down, drastically for our field stretcher, teams continued to stack the box, etc etc etc.

    Don't try to take this as a "Marrdro bashing the Noodle" point of discussion, as it isn't. Alot of issues contributed to this (Hammies, OL protection, etc).

    Call it bullshit all you want, but its the statistically the truth.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Personnel, philosophy has NFC North looking to run
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2008, 09:07 AM
  2. New Philosophy
    By VikingMike in forum Two Beer Minimum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-03-2008, 08:21 PM
  3. Vikings' blitzing philosophy: Get them before they get you
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-29-2007, 05:50 PM
  4. Steve Loney - Offensive Coordinator Philosophy
    By dbalke10 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-18-2005, 04:15 AM
  5. And my philosophy was right
    By VikingsTw in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-08-2003, 12:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •