How 'Bout Bulger?

**swardsooner** · 04-05-2010, 10:05 PM

Got his walking papers today. I think he had an impossible uphill climb at St. Louis. He's a proven NFL calibre QB that might thrive in Minnesota with a real o-line.

**Rockmolder** · 04-05-2010, 10:11 PM

If you guys where running the Vikings, you'd have 20 QBs on the roster by now.

You're getting Favre back, TJ and Sage are on the roster, why on earth would you want to add another veteran? If anything, I'd want another young, developmental guy.

**Zeus** · 04-05-2010, 10:20 PM

swardsooner wrote:

Got his walking papers today. I think he had an impossible uphill climb at St. Louis. He's a proven NFL calibre QB that might thrive in Minnesota with a real o-line.

Dear God, no.

=Z=

**swardsooner** · 04-05-2010, 10:23 PM

Whoa...he's 33. Thought he was 30. Time flies. Oh well, Favre has made 40 the new 30. :P

**happy camper** · 04-06-2010, 12:13 AM

If we didn't have Sage I would be for it. I think we are pretty set at #2 and #3 QB.

**Marrdro** · 04-06-2010, 07:00 AM

How many of you that are considering this cat were worried about Dnabb staying healthy.

Suffice it to say that Dnabb is a Ironman compared to Bulger.

Look, the cat is a average at best QB when he has a OL that can give him extra time. Put any sort of pressure on him and he folds like a wet paper sack.

**tarkenton10** · 04-06-2010, 09:22 AM

Rockmolder wrote:

If you guys where running the Vikings, you'd have 20 QBs on the roster by now.

You're getting Favre back, TJ and Sage are on the roster, why on earth would you want to add another veteran? If anything, I'd want another young, developmental guy.

Thank you Jesus!! One sane voice from out of the wilderness!! We don't need another old vet to get us through another season. We need to find a QB in this draft so he can learn from Favre for a year!!

**NodakPaul** · 04-06-2010, 09:25 AM

swardsooner wrote:

Got his walking papers today. I think he had an impossible uphill climb at St. Louis. He's a proven NFL calibre QB that might thrive in Minnesota with a real o-line.

He has been injured too much, and his production has fallen off so radically from his 2006 season that there is more than just the complimenting team to blame.

I would go with Jackson before going with Bulger (and if anyone knows how I feel about Jackson, then they will realize what a statement that is).

**C Mac D** · 04-06-2010, 09:27 AM

NodakPaul wrote:

swardsooner wrote:

Got his walking papers today. I think he had an impossible uphill climb at St. Louis. He's a proven NFL calibre QB that might thrive in Minnesota with a real o-line.

He has been injured too much, and his production has fallen off so radically from his 2006 season that there is more than just the complimenting team to blame.

I would go with Jackson before going with Bulger (and if anyone knows how I feel about Jackson, then they will realize what a statement that is).

Hear, hear! But good to hear!

Honestly, I'd rather have Sage than Bulger.

**Prophet** · 04-06-2010, 09:34 AM

C Mac D wrote:

NodakPaul wrote:

swardsooner wrote:

Got his walking papers today. I think he had an impossible uphill climb at St. Louis. He's a proven NFL calibre QB that might thrive in Minnesota with a real o-line.

He has been injured too much, and his production has fallen off so radically from his 2006 season that there is more than just the complimenting team to blame.

I would go with Jackson before going with Bulger (and if anyone knows how I feel about Jackson, then they will realize what a statement that is).

Hear, hear! But good to hear!

Honestly, I'd rather have Sage than Bulger.

I would rather eat a fish that was washed up on a beach for a week in the heat of summer than Phat Pat's fermented dingleberries.