Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31
    nephilimstorm's Avatar
    nephilimstorm is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,184

    Rams open to Trading Number 2 Overall

    Just a thought an article from NFL.com...Would we pull the trigger for Crabtree??

    http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/04/07/rams-will-listen-to-offers-for-no-2-pick/

  2. #32
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,928

    Re: Here's a new idea!

    "jmcdon00" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "V4L" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "jmcdon00" wrote:
    Right but for every Jamarcus Russel there is a Matt Ryan. If you pick the right guy the money is worth it. Sure the risks are higher with a top pick, but the rewards are too.
    And if a team in that spot would prefer to pick later they can. The raiders can pick any 2 guys from the entire draft class, wait until one of them is taken then draft the other the next pick, they still get one of there top 2 but get them cheaper.
    Well maybe not every JR there is a MR.
    My guess, someone probably has the stat someplace, it is about every 5 or so you get a Matty Ice.

    ;D

    I would say it's prob pretty even

    Lately we've had Big Ben, Rivers, Eli (meh), Matty Ice etc

    And had people like Russell who was a dumb pick IMO as first anyway

    It's gotta be pretty close IMO.. But is that really worth the risk? Once again it's prob a 50/50 shot you get someone like that
    Did a quick google search....

    http://www.twominutewarning.com/qbrd1.htm
    http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn...c.php?t=452945
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...d-quarterbacks
    No one says you have to take a QB in the first. How do right tackles fair in the first 10 picks? Pretty well I'd guess.
    Anyway you slice it the number 1 pick is for sure the best spot, you can pick anytime you want. You don't have to go first. The lions could wait and take the 7th pick or the 12th. Sure this never happens but there is no rule against it.
    Yea, I don't think we are advocating taking a QB in the first, just discussing the success of the ones taken lately vs (as you said) the safer pick (i.e. OT).
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Good idea - Bad idea?
    By Bkfldviking in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-20-2009, 10:11 PM
  2. Good idea or Very Bad Idea?
    By Bkfldviking in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-08-2009, 09:32 AM
  3. Good idea-bad idea?
    By Bretto007 in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-07-2008, 08:02 PM
  4. Rams pick Wisconsin site for training camp
    By marstc09 in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-23-2008, 03:38 PM
  5. Rams pick up former Vikings assistant
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-23-2006, 12:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •