Thread: Green or Huard?
-
01-19-2007, 12:07 PM #1
Green or Huard?
Chiefs | Green or Huard?
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:57:15 -0800
Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs will likely keep QB Trent Green or QB Damon Huard on the roster next season, but not both.
Well seeing as the Chiefs won't keep both of them, it might be in our best interest to sign either one, Huard filled in admirably when Green went down and Green isn't bad himself. We could use the veteran presence for Tarvaris.
-
01-19-2007, 12:10 PM #2
Re: Green or Huard?
"UndisputedVike" wrote:
If the Vikings signed Trent Green, it would be to start football games.Chiefs | Green or Huard?
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:57:15 -0800
Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs will likely keep QB Trent Green or QB Damon Huard on the roster next season, but not both.
Well seeing as the Chiefs won't keep both of them, it might be in our best interest to sign either one, Huard filled in admirably when Green went down and Green isn't bad himself. We could use the veteran presence for Tarvaris.
He's not yet a backup, IMHO.
Huard is Brooks Bollinger.
We already got one of those.
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
-
01-19-2007, 12:21 PM #3
Re: Green or Huard?
I would take Green
Why would they get rid?
$$
-
Re: Green or Huard?
"Zeus" wrote:
Huard threw 11 Touchdowns and 1 Interception when he filled in for Green, i dont think Bollinger has ever had that kind of TD/INT rate"UndisputedVike" wrote:
If the Vikings signed Trent Green, it would be to start football games.Chiefs | Green or Huard?
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:57:15 -0800
Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs will likely keep QB Trent Green or QB Damon Huard on the roster next season, but not both.
Well seeing as the Chiefs won't keep both of them, it might be in our best interest to sign either one, Huard filled in admirably when Green went down and Green isn't bad himself. We could use the veteran presence for Tarvaris.
He's not yet a backup, IMHO.
Huard is Brooks Bollinger.
We already got one of those.
=Z=
----
PUT IN JACKSON!
-
01-19-2007, 12:43 PM #5
Re: Green or Huard?
"skum" wrote:
Fluke."Zeus" wrote:
Huard threw 11 Touchdowns and 1 Interception when he filled in for Green, i dont think Bollinger has ever had that kind of TD/INT rate"UndisputedVike" wrote:
If the Vikings signed Trent Green, it would be to start football games.Chiefs | Green or Huard?
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:57:15 -0800
Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports the Kansas City Chiefs will likely keep QB Trent Green or QB Damon Huard on the roster next season, but not both.
Well seeing as the Chiefs won't keep both of them, it might be in our best interest to sign either one, Huard filled in admirably when Green went down and Green isn't bad himself. We could use the veteran presence for Tarvaris.
He's not yet a backup, IMHO.
Huard is Brooks Bollinger.
We already got one of those.
=Z=
Career backup gets a chance with a good team and one of the top 3 RBs in the league.
The Chiefs starter should be Green.
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
Similar Threads
-
Huard named Chiefs starter
By cajunvike in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 08-26-2007, 12:58 AM -
Chiefs sign Huard to three-year deal
By Zeus in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 03-01-2007, 05:33 AM -
What's going on in Green Bay?!?!?!
By Potus2028 in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: 10-26-2006, 05:43 AM -
Does Green Bay WANT to win????
By COJOMAY in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 68Last Post: 12-08-2005, 12:12 AM -
rams get a green bay corner green bay loses more d fense
By Lotza in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 16Last Post: 04-12-2005, 10:49 PM



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks