Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37
  1. #11
    LL-MMan's Avatar
    LL-MMan is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    169

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    "sleepagent" wrote:
    "LL-MMan" wrote:
    There's no way we go after a WR round 1. At the earliest maybe round 3 with the Hawks pick. Other than that, I'm not too worried about the position. Give Troy Will some time and he'll develop into a Steve Smith.
    FOXSPORTS thinks we'll take a WR in the first round.

    Here's the link -> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5429730

    I say take the best available athlete in the first round, regardless of our needs. With all the injuries in this league, it doesn't hurt to have depth.
    I've seen the foxsports mock. They're a bunch of tools. It's not going to happen guys. And when is the last time you've seen a mock draft be accurate?

    Viking fans hunger a Championship more than anyone in sports.

    Bring it home boyz.
    Bring it home.

  2. #12
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    Screw that...we have bigger needs in the first couple of rounds. There are plenty of opportunities to trade up for a quarterback and there are 3 or 4 mid-late first round linebackers that we could take too. We have more pressing needs than receiver.

    With that said, I wouldn't mind drafting a middle round receiver.

  3. #13
    LuckyVike's Avatar
    LuckyVike is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,785

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    It wouldn't bother me too much if we drafted Chad Jackson. He's a VERY talented WR IMO.
    The best part of my day is when I get down on my knees, with my head in my hands, and thank GOD for everything he has given me.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    915

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    We don't need a WR we have plenty. We need LB's and possibly depth at RB. We are fine at WR
    You republican whore!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    213

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    I have no problem with taking a flyer on a WR on the second day but drafting one in the first, you have to be kidding me. Nate was a great steal in the third round and he is classy guy that I hope finds much success but let's not overreact.

    We have MUCH greater need at other positions. Namely, QB, LB, Secondary, and RG. Our stable of recievers is second to none. It was too crowded with Nate as it was. We've got K-Rob, T-Will, TT, and M-Rob. That's PLENTY of talent at that position when compared to the other positions I've already listed.

    If we draft a reciever before the fourth round, I'll throw something at the TV (unless it just happens to be an incredible steal).

    -DD
    The Betic Always Gets His Shot!

  6. #16
    LL-MMan's Avatar
    LL-MMan is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    169

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    "LuckyVike" wrote:
    It wouldn't bother me too much if we drafted Chad Jackson. He's a VERY talented WR IMO.
    but so were Edwards and Williams... what did they do for their teams last year?

    I'm not saying we need instant impact, but I would like a QB or defender in round 1.

    Viking fans hunger a Championship more than anyone in sports.

    Bring it home boyz.
    Bring it home.

  7. #17
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    "LL-MMan" wrote:
    "LuckyVike" wrote:
    It wouldn't bother me too much if we drafted Chad Jackson. He's a VERY talented WR IMO.
    but so were Edwards and Williams... what did they do for their teams last year?

    I'm not saying we need instant impact, but I would like a QB or defender in round 1.

    That's wack bro..

    Edwards was doing good until he got hurt...

    And Williams is on a crappy team.. Don't expect much from him

  8. #18
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    If there isn't a player we need at our pick we should go Jackson or Maroney with it..

    One of the top 3 QB's isn't gonna be there most likely..

    Who knows about lineman?

    There is a TON of talented LB's in this draft.. If Sims is there grab him though

  9. #19
    Json is offline GM
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,109

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    I'm new here and just want to say whats up. I posted a couple things on the "good riddance burleson thread' but I'm here to just introduce myself. I look forward to discussing viking news from this day forward. GO VIKINGS!

  10. #20
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?

    Make a thread in the "free beer" forum!!

    Introduce yourself there man.. Tell us about urself

    Welcome man

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why AD could be leaving
    By gagarr in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 06-25-2010, 10:14 AM
  2. Leaving for the states in a few
    By skum in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-02-2008, 11:13 AM
  3. I'm NOT Leaving!!!
    By cajunvike in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 11-17-2005, 01:51 AM
  4. Hovan leaving
    By bignate13 in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-04-2005, 09:04 PM
  5. Leaving......
    By DaScRuM in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-22-2005, 01:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •