-
03-25-2006, 08:54 PM #1
draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
i think we should draft one in the later rounds like 4-6. what to you think?
-
03-25-2006, 08:56 PM #2
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
I think since Nate is gone lets get Chad Jackson in the 1st. Who else is there to get now? Or maybe even Vernon Davis and put him at reciever.

-
03-25-2006, 09:03 PM #3
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
sure, we'll probably get one, but only in the later rounds.

-
03-25-2006, 09:04 PM #4
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
"coreychavous21" wrote:
Let's not overreact here.I think since Nate is gone lets get Chad Jackson in the 1st. Who else is there to get now? Or maybe even Vernon Davis and put him at reciever.
-
03-25-2006, 09:04 PM #5
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
The first? You gotta be joking! Our recievers aren't bad enough to warrant that (& we're not the Lions). What are the chances of us landing Moulds?
----------------------------------YESSSSS!--------------------------
-
03-25-2006, 09:05 PM #6
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
There's no way we go after a WR round 1. At the earliest maybe round 3 with the Hawks pick. Other than that, I'm not too worried about the position. Give Troy Will some time and he'll develop into a Steve Smith.

Viking fans hunger a Championship more than anyone in sports.
Bring it home boyz.
Bring it home.
-
03-25-2006, 09:14 PM #7
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
"rdknieff" wrote:
He's not getting much attention from teams, last I heard he visited with the Steelers. He'd be more of a plug, than a true fix.The first? You gotta be joking! Our recievers aren't bad enough to warrant that (& we're not the Lions). What are the chances of us landing Moulds?
-
03-25-2006, 09:15 PM #8
Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,505
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
"LL-MMan" wrote:
FOXSPORTS thinks we'll take a WR in the first round.There's no way we go after a WR round 1. At the earliest maybe round 3 with the Hawks pick. Other than that, I'm not too worried about the position. Give Troy Will some time and he'll develop into a Steve Smith.
Here's the link -> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5429730
I say take the best available athlete in the first round, regardless of our needs. With all the injuries in this league, it doesn't hurt to have depth.
"No Greater Friend . . . No Worse Enemy. U.S. MARINES"
"FIND YOUR PASSION AND MAKE IT HAPPEN!"
"SUCCESS LOOKS EASY TO THOSE THAT WEREN'T THERE WHEN IT WAS BEING ACHIEVED!"
-
03-25-2006, 09:18 PM #9
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
Moulds would be great to get, but it will never happen. He wants a huge contract for the elight recievers of the league and we can't afford to pay that much. If we did convince him to sign a reasonable contract I'd be amazed, we could have the best offense in the NFL.
-
03-25-2006, 09:19 PM #10
Re: draft a WR because nate might be leaving?
I'd be cool with Jackson in the first round.. Just as long as there isn't Vince or Sims available..
K-rob, T-willy, Jackson sounds frickin amazing
Similar Threads
-
Why AD could be leaving
By gagarr in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 63Last Post: 06-25-2010, 10:14 AM -
Leaving for the states in a few
By skum in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 2Last Post: 11-02-2008, 11:13 AM -
I'm NOT Leaving!!!
By cajunvike in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 41Last Post: 11-17-2005, 01:51 AM -
Hovan leaving
By bignate13 in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 31Last Post: 07-04-2005, 09:04 PM -
Leaving......
By DaScRuM in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 01-22-2005, 01:24 PM



Reply With Quote







Bookmarks