-
05-05-2011, 04:30 PM #111
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
No one is mixing apples & oranges.
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1096295
Typically a player drafted 10-15 MAY be started & provide immediate impact, but that's generally for a non-QB position.
A QB drafted 10-15 MAY be started & provide immediate impact, but there's nothing typical about us drafting him at 12.
The Vikings didn't even want him at 12 & tried up until the last seconds to trade down their 12th pick. Everyone knows that. Common knowledge.
The reason he was taken at 12 is because they couldn't make a trade & feared he would be gone at 43.
Do you typically start a QB who if he wasn't taken at 12, could have been taken 30-40? How about 20-30?
And while you didn't say Bowmar would start, that's exactly what you would be doing if for some reason Ponder couldn't start or was injured.
Or it would have to be Webb, who still, IMO needs time. Unfortunately Bomar probably needs more time than Webb.
Bomar can't teach Ponder the scheme. Know one should want Bomar, except you, to teach Ponder anything?
Why? Bomar was a Viking for 10 fucking whole days. Now you think he's qualified to teach something he hasn't learned himself yet? His entire *cough* illustrious NFL career has been on a practice squad.
He's thrown a total of 86 NFL passes, all in preseason, which he completed a grand total of 47.6%, was sacked 8 times (almost 10% of the time) in attempting to do so & his Bomar brain has earned him an average 52.6 QB rating.
The Vikings aren't going to take that kind of risk.
Not when there's a pool of FA vets out their that have plenty of game day experience.
Not when there might be very little time at all to train/coach Ponder. Hello? The coaches and players aren't even communicating during this CBA thing & might not up until July or August.
Ponder might be good to go. Then again he might not. I doubt the Vikings will put all their eggs in one basket at this point & assume he is.
For if he's not, we are stuck starting Webb or Bomar for the rest of the season.
Even if he starts, I hope Frazier & Co. are smart enough to know that 2nd year Viking Webb & 10 day Viking Bomar don't have the experience or knowledge to teach anything remotely close to what a savvy veteran QB can.
The difference in the experience between those two groups is night & day.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
or apples and oranges? :whistle:
Originally Posted by "singersp" #1096419

-
05-05-2011, 10:03 PM #113
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
Bring back Gus!!! Loved that guy.
None
-
05-05-2011, 10:26 PM #114
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
LOL! I was seriously going to use that & say, "there's the apples & oranges" you speak of", but figured he would have got wrapped up in that & lost the main crux of the post.
Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1096442

"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
05-05-2011, 10:29 PM #115
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
I think Palmer or Bulger would be a much better influence on Ponder than McNabb would be.
Sign either of those guys to a 2-3 year deal to bring in that veteran presence. Palmer would probably start week 1, Bulger would in all likelihood be a backup.
-
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
I want Ponder starting day 1.. If we want a veteran at his side, re-sign Patrick Ramsey..

----
PUT IN JACKSON!
-
05-06-2011, 03:42 PM #117
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
First, I'm not tied to Bomar. All I'm saying is that he and Webb has the most experience in the "NEW SCHEME" with Ponder right behind them.
Originally Posted by "singersp" #1096419
Think about that statement and take into account that they are the only ones who have talked to the staff right?
Does that mean they are infinitely familiar with it? Hell no. I never said that.
As to the QB's ability to have an impact taken were we took him.....Cutler didn't do to bad.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
So what point are you trying to make? A guy who may or may not have the playbook, and is still learning the scheme, but wasn't good enough to make the 53 man roster last year is the most qualified to play the role of Veteran Backup on this team?
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1096562
As for Cutler, he was projected as a top round pick the entire time. Many predicted he would be the top QB of that class.
Looking through Mocks, the first five I find for 06, I see cutler going 10, 17(us), 10, 13 and 10
I see Ponder going 28, 43, (not in the first round), 25 and (not in first round)
Ponder was not a top-15 prospect, Cutler was. Cutler had an elite arm, mobility and size. Cutler looked to be everything you wanted in a QB. Ponder has a winning attitude, and some mobility but an average NFL arm.
If Ponder was in that 2006 class, I would be absolutely shocked if he went before Cutler.
Yes, POnder was taken #12 overall, no, Ponder was not a top 15-talent.
I seem to recall you claiming that being a first round QB didn't make you a successful NFL quarterback. Well being a top-15 pick doesn't make you a guy who can start successfully day one.
-
05-06-2011, 04:32 PM #119
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
McNabb is not the right veteran IMO. He failed miserably with Washington last year...word is (Sirius XM NFL Radio, specifically, Kirwan and Ryan) that he simply could not grasp the playbook. Eagles fans were quite happy to see him go, even to Washington, a Division rival. Yes, he beat them their first meeting, but, by in large, he sucked...and, I think he's done, kaput, finished.
If the Vikes are locked in on bringing in a veteran (I'm not sure), why not sign Bulger to a two-year deal? Word out of Baltimore (again, Sirius XM) is that he was in the best shape of his career last year and that he was a tremendous influence on Flacco.
McNabb makes no sense to me.
Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent
----------------------------------------------
As a matter of fact, I do know
-
05-06-2011, 04:34 PM #120
Re: Donovan McNabb to Minnesota Vikings?It makes sense
Sign either of those guys to a 2-3 year deal to bring in that veteran presence. Palmer would probably start week 1, Bulger would in all likelihood be a backup.I want Ponder starting day 1 too. I forgot about Bulger. I doubt we would plunk down that much cash for a backup QB though. Bulger will be a hot commodity for some teams looking for a starter. Ramsey might do. Maybe even Kerry Collins if the Titans let him go.I want Ponder starting day 1.. If we want a veteran at his side, re-sign Patrick Ramsey
I sure as hell don't want McNabb. I have never liked the guy. I have no idea why.None
Similar Threads
-
Michael Jenkins Makes Sense For The Vikings
By jargomcfargo in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 54Last Post: 08-03-2011, 07:28 PM -
Michael Jenkins makes sense for Vikings
By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 07-30-2011, 02:53 AM -
Donovan McNabb will wear #5 with the Vikings (Pic)
By MulletMullitia in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 07-30-2011, 02:42 AM -
Why the Vikings Should Have Pursued Donovan McNabb
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 45Last Post: 11-19-2010, 04:42 PM -
So much for the Donovan Mcnabb thing
By buliwyf in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 12-31-2007, 11:45 PM




Reply With Quote






Bookmarks