Thread: DE Ray Edwards

"skum" wrote:

What u talking about, Ray Edwards is worth a late 4 rounder..

the scouting report muggsy posted said he was worth a late second rounder.

but of course, muggsy didnt highlight that part. :???:

"skum" wrote:

What u talking about, Ray Edwards is worth a late 4 rounder..

I've never seen him play so I can't judge, but do we really need a DE, let alone a DE with no motor? Players like that have hard times making teams.

If you read his bio, he also plays outside linebacker, yes in a 3-4, but we are set on the d-line and we can develop him into a couple of different positions. Do most of you not see that we are drafting people we can develop in to multiple positions. Cook, T, G, C...Edwards DE, OLB, Griffin, CB, S. The last pick may turn out to be better than the first. 0-16, what a crock of Sh*t

has udeze played a full season yet? No, we need depth. Has James been a guranteed yet? no so we got a DE.......try to think what Childress is thinking.

What the F**k... Once he were in the 1. round and just becauce you dont know him do not make it a bad pick

"DaunteHOF" wrote:

has udeze played a full season yet? No, we need depth. Has James been a guranteed yet? no so we got a DE.......try to think what Childress is thinking.

We also have Darrion Scott and DeQuincy Scott, who are both good backups.

0-16!!! are you kidding me... if you do remember the vikings had a pretty good offseason... one bad draft, and we don't even know if it is a bad draft until the players play... i don't think the draft is gonna make the players we already know are good worse.

Depressing day, just like yesterday.

Wow.. Im pretty sure everyone on here doesn't know ANYTHING about these guys.. I bet you've never watched a game or even read anything about these late round guys..

You can't say they were bad picks unless you know something about the player

didn't really need a DE... at least we have plenty of depth... another receiver would have been nice, though...