Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40
  1. #21
    DogPound's Avatar
    DogPound is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    93

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    First off the Texans want Bush very bad...they are not gonna trade..second we will draft a running back or linebacker ....depending on who slips and who's left....My thoughts are White,Maroney..and maybe Greenway?
    ~ I BLEED PURPLE!! ~

  2. #22
    magicci's Avatar
    magicci is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    oxnard, ca
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    yea i rechecked and i was wrong
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=nfldraftorder&prov=st&type=lgns
    but i have a question about this link. where it says coin flip does that mean the 49ers can become the 6th pick

  3. #23
    mnjamie's Avatar
    mnjamie is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,536

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    Vince is coming out .... so this thing is already scewed ... it makes no sense to mock when all the players that are going to or not delcare havn't done so already .... IMO

  4. #24
    mnjamie's Avatar
    mnjamie is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,536

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    By the way, Pope is a much better ALL AROUND T.E. then V.D. and Mercedes .... he can actually block where V.D. and Mercedes are glorified, puffed up WR's ... I take Pope, otherwise we end up in the same position as we are now in, keeping an additional strictly blocking TE on the roster and telegraphing to the "D" when we are going to run / pass by the personel package we send on the field.


    Oh by the way, no TE for the VIkes first round ... to many other area's of concern. OL, LB, RB just to name a few.

  5. #25
    stjmnsota's Avatar
    stjmnsota is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    333

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    I don't believe Lendale, Maroney or Williams fall that far, it would be ridiculous to pass any of them up if they get a chance. Who doesn't need running backs, especially the Vikes. WHITE to the Vikes!

  6. #26
    Mr. Purple's Avatar
    Mr. Purple is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,005

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    I'll bet ya that one of them drops to us. Thier not freaks of nature like Bush and Young are. Not every team needs a RB, in fact, alot dont.

    Theres NOTHING greater then a Florida Gator!
    "I promise everyone this. When Childress is let go in two years I can honestly say this.
    "I am not surprised"."-PurplePackerEater

  7. #27
    DCPologirl is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,280

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    NO way we take a TE over two or three RBs that are much better fits for our offense...Wiggins is being paid what he is because that is what the market value is for him...but I think that he is a steal at that price...we don't replace our leading receiver of the last two years just like that!

    Better to replace a bunch of underperforming RBs with a rookie that will come in ala Cadillac Williams and turn around our bland, moribund offense!
    I agree

    DCPologirl:Maybe Randy will make Aaron Brooks look better......roflmao Del Rio: I guarantee he will

  8. #28
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    It is tough to speculate until you get a couple of the combines done and see how players score and get an idea of whose stock is rising and whose is falling.


    Right now I am more concerned about getting the Viking coaching staff in place, and hearing how the evaluate the players from last year, our free agents, and other free agents. Who will they keep from last years team and who will they let go? It will give us a better idea what we need to do in the draft once some of these questions are answered.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  9. #29
    XxS2TheEvoxX is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    304

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    IF DeAngelo fell to us, there is no way we could pass that up... he's going to be GREAT.

    While Vernon Davis is going to be an amazing player, Tight End really isn't a position of need for us right now. Wiggins has been producing, and until he stops... we don't need another tight end.

    One of the top tier runningbacks will be avaliable when we pick, but I'm still not too sure if we'll address that in free agency or via trade.

    It's doubtful that Williams falls to us... but either Maroney or LenDale White should be avaliable.

  10. #30
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: *****Brand New Mock*****

    "whackthepack" wrote:
    It is tough to speculate until you get a couple of the combines done and see how players score and get an idea of whose stock is rising and whose is falling.


    Right now I am more concerned about getting the Viking coaching staff in place, and hearing how the evaluate the players from last year, our free agents, and other free agents. Who will they keep from last years team and who will they let go? It will give us a better idea what we need to do in the draft once some of these questions are answered.
    This is the most sensible post I think I have ever read!

    Nice job Whack!

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. With the brand new mini GHD iv styler
    By pretty1 in forum College Ball
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 10:00 AM
  2. "Free beer" is my favorite brand.
    By Axel in forum Free Beer!
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-03-2007, 11:17 AM
  3. I think I'll like this brand of football
    By punisher in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-22-2006, 07:34 PM
  4. A Brand New Vikings Emblem
    By Tice-A-Roni in forum Trash the Pack
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-22-2004, 11:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •