Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Bly?

  1. #11
    Del Rio Guest

    Re: Bly?

    He is good at covering actual bodies but not area's of space, and our defense is designed to cover area's of space as opposed to actual players.

    There is no reason to sign Dre Bly unless you want another scapegoat on our team and another over paid nickle back.

  2. #12
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,055

    Re: Bly?

    This thread was started yesterday early morning by our PPO Newshound Singersp..

    http://www.purplepride.org/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=149&topic=31499.0

  3. #13
    hawaiianvike21 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,412

    Re: Bly?

    no way in hell our own divisional rival would trade one of their top d players to another rival. no way. :

    he might be a good fit but like others have said hes getting up there in age and i would like to see cedric griffin play opposite winfield. griffin did pretty decently until he got injured.
    Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a


  4. #14
    nephilimstorm's Avatar
    nephilimstorm is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,184

    Re: Bly?

    We got a great second year CB coming back next year in Cedric Griffin..why spend the money on Bly unless hes willing to play Nickel back

  5. #15
    MVIKING7's Avatar
    MVIKING7 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    347

    Re: Bly?

    Give me the Bly-man!!! He would definitly be an upgrade!

  6. #16
    nephilimstorm's Avatar
    nephilimstorm is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,184

    Re: Bly?

    Like i said Bly would probably be playing nickel if he came to MN

  7. #17
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Bly?

    I find it ironic that members here want to cut Smoot & bring in Bly.

    Bly is like Smoot. Both of them are cover corners & do not fit the best into the Tampa 2 defense. In fact the reason the Lions are letting Bly go is because they are switching to the Tampa 2 defense. The same defense we currently run.

    So I'd like to know, if the Lions don't feel Dre Bly fits into their Tampa 2 defense, what makes you think he will fit into ours?


    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •