Thread: Is This A UFO On The Bottom Of The Ocean?

Swedish sea treasure hunters have found something extraordinary: an 18m disc sunk in the bottom of the ocean, with what appears to be 300m long impact tracks leading to it. The team leader never found anything like it.

http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/08/is-this-a-ufo-on-the-bottom-of-the-ocean/

Cool! Someone pay to get it to the surface!

Is This A UFO On The Bottom Of The Ocean?

Looks more like our chances of winning the SB, based on the FA moves.

Couple things come to mind:

1. It's hard to believe that an object could have enough velocity (my guess terminal wouldn't' cut it) to travel through 278 feet of water (even more if you account for the angle) and still leave an impact trail of 1000 feet.

2.) It's only in 278' of water, relatively shallow in the grand scheme of things. Shouldn't cost to much to send down an ROV to take pictures/video. In fact, it's almost impossible to believe somebody hasn't already done it.

I think they call these USO's. Unidentified submerged objects. There have been reports of UFO's flying into and out of the water.

So that's what happened to the Millennium Falcon.

Originally Posted by "BloodyHorns82" #1102656

Couple things come to mind:

1. It's hard to believe that an object could have enough velocity (my guess terminal wouldn't' cut it) to travel through 278 feet of water (even more if you account for the angle) and still leave an impact trail of 1000 feet.

2.) It's only in 278' of water, relatively shallow in the grand scheme of things. Shouldn't cost to much to send down an ROV to take pictures/video. In fact, it's almost impossible to believe somebody hasn't already done it.

That's far to logical for this site Trent! :laugh:

Originally Posted by "Johnson14" #1104662

Originally Posted by "BloodyHorns82" #1102656

Couple things come to mind:

1. It's hard to believe that an object could have enough velocity (my guess terminal wouldn't' cut it) to travel through 278 feet of water (even more if you account for the angle) and still leave an impact trail of 1000 feet.

2.) It's only in 278' of water, relatively shallow in the grand scheme of things. Shouldn't cost to much to send down an ROV to take pictures/video. In fact, it's almost impossible to believe somebody hasn't already done it.

That's far to logical for this site Trent! :laugh:

Yeah, I know...It's much more fun to imagine E.T. stuck down there with his nose pressed up against the port hole, pounding on the glass screaming for help. "Soembody get me out of here!", or in alien speak, "a;sodifasdj jdkjfds jidsa asdf!"

Originally Posted by "BloodyHorns82" #1104664

Originally Posted by "Johnson14" #1104662

Originally Posted by "BloodyHorns82" #1102656

Couple things come to mind:

1. It's hard to believe that an object could have enough velocity (my guess terminal wouldn't' cut it) to travel through 278 feet of water (even more if you account for the angle) and still leave an impact trail of 1000 feet.

2.) It's only in 278' of water, relatively shallow in the grand scheme of things. Shouldn't cost to much to send down an ROV to take pictures/video. In fact, it's almost impossible to believe somebody hasn't already done it.

That's far to logical for this site Trent! :laugh:

Yeah, I know...It's much more fun to imagine E.T. stuck down there with his nose pressed up against the port hole, pounding on the glass screaming for help. "Soembody get me out of here!", or in alien speak, "a;sodifasdj jdkjfds jidsa asdf!"

I can imagine ET banging his head against the window shouting "this never would have happened with the BMX!"..

Originally Posted by "josdin00" #1102689

So that's what happened to the Millennium Falcon.

that was my first thought Also lol