Those slimeballs!

**Turboe** · 07-20-2005, 05:55 AM

Horray for someone who might actually do what Supreme Court Justices are supposed to do. Interpret The Constitution!! Instead of write law from the bench.

Go Johnny, Go Johnny!!

**DarrinNelsonguy** · 07-20-2005, 05:59 AM

"Turboe" wrote:

Horray for someone who might actually do what Supreme Court Justices are supposed to do. Interpret The Constitution!! Instead of write law from the bench.

Go Johnny, Go Johnny!!

Could not agree more.

**LuckyVike** · 07-20-2005, 06:01 AM

I don't know too much about the guy. I just read an article on cnn.com about him. Says he's a big conservative. Hopefully he's atleast not an idiot, but if Bush picked him, in my eyes that's already a strike against 'em.

**ColoradoVike** · 07-20-2005, 06:24 AM

"Turboe" wrote:

Horray for someone who might actually do what Supreme Court Justices are supposed to do. Interpret The Constitution!! Instead of write law from the bench.

Go Johnny, Go Johnny!!

Actually, in a study of supreme court justices, conservatives went against congressional rulings more than liberal justices. Clarence Thomas took first prize in this category. Statistically speaking, justices of the conservative persuation are fit to wear the "activist judge" more than anyone else.

**PAvikesfan** · 07-20-2005, 06:29 AM

"Vikes2611" wrote:

I don't know too much about the guy. I just read an article on cnn.com about him. Says he's a big conservative. Hopefully he's atleast not an idiot, but if Bush picked him, in my eyes that's already a strike against 'em.

my first thought too... we give bush too many decisions--i know that sounds weird cause he's the president and all but...

if he would just make the right decision for once maybe i wouldn't feel that way.

**Ltrey33** · 07-20-2005, 01:41 PM

"DarrinNelsonguy" wrote:

"Turboe" wrote:

Horray for someone who might actually do what Supreme Court Justices are supposed to do. Interpret The Constitution!! Instead of write law from the bench.

Go Johnny, Go Johnny!!

Could not agree more.

I concur.

Del Rio · 07-20-2005, 02:06 PM

Cajun,

Did you expect any different? He is not concerned with how to help the country he is concerned with cramming as many republicans as he possibly can into any possible position during his short stay with us.

6-KINGS · 07-20-2005, 03:18 PM

"Del Rio" wrote:

Cajun,

Did you expect any different? He is not concerned with how to help the country he is concerned with cramming as many republicans as he possibly can into any possible position during his short stay with us.

Actually he did both.
John Roberts is the brightest legal mind of this generation.
Won 65% of cases he argued before the Supreme Court.
A strict constructionist. Which is what a Justice should be.
Not like the old crusty left wing agenda driven hacks that make up 2/3 of the present court.
It is time the court was filled with judges that interpret the law, not legislate it.
We have a whole other branch of Government that does that. It is called Congress. And actually that is their job.
And just like when a Democrat is in the White House they pick Democrats.
It is all about doing what you promised to do if you get elected.
So this is really business as usual for any sitting President.

I know what you Dems worry about is your Holy Grail of legalizes abortion.
Don't worry you can still kill babies.

6-KINGS