NFL Says Stop Playing Glitter

Prophet · 09-18-2006, 03:20 PM

NFL Says Stop Playing Glitter
Date: 18th September, 2006
Posted by: A.S. Tkatch

**AngloVike** · 09-18-2006, 03:28 PM

Not bad NFL .. only took you 6 months to realise about him ... obviously the fact that he's been in the press for the last few years for the same matters was overlooked.
Still nice to see that Chiefs fans have standards - said with tongue placed firmly in cheek

**ultravikingfan** · 09-18-2006, 03:55 PM

Why on earth would they do that?

:

**BadlandsVikings** · 09-18-2006, 05:51 PM

Good to know that the NFL is distanceing themselves from the kiddie porn king.

**Zeus** · 09-19-2006, 08:33 AM

"Prophet" wrote:

NFL Says Stop Playing Glitter
Date: 18th September, 2006
Posted by: A.S. Tkatch

That story is like two weeks old, dood.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14534600/site/newsweek/

=Z=

**ultravikingfan** · 09-19-2006, 01:56 PM

I heard they are going to start playing Michael Jackson instead.

**AngloVike** · 09-19-2006, 02:19 PM

"AWZeus" wrote:

"Prophet" wrote:

NFL Says Stop Playing Glitter
Date: 18th September, 2006
Posted by: A.S. Tkatch

That story is like two weeks old, dood.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14534600/site/newsweek/

=Z=

they obviously work at the same rate as the NFL
;D

**scottishvike** · 09-20-2006, 02:52 PM

The Kansas City Chief's fans did not want to vote for a new song and sent dozens of angry e-mails to the team. The NFL gave its OK to the team to use a cover version by The Tube Tops.

Now I could be wrong about this but I thought all the royalties from a cover version go to the original artist, which would defeat the purpose of doing that. Besides the money issue I wouldn't want me or my team associated with that evil git anyway.

**AngloVike** · 09-20-2006, 02:57 PM

"scottishvike" wrote:

The Kansas City Chief's fans did not want to vote for a new song and sent dozens of angry e-mails to the team. The NFL gave its OK to the team to use a cover version by The Tube Tops.

Now I could be wrong about this but I thought all the royalties from a cover version go to the original artist, which would defeat the purpose of doing that. Besides the money issue I wouldn't want me or my team associated with that evil git anyway.

lets be fair ... evil, fat, ugly and balding git
;D