Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,569

    It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    LYNWOOD, Ill. - Be careful if you have saggy pants in the south Chicago suburb of Lynwood. Village leaders have passed an ordinance that would levy $25 fines against anyone showing three inches or more of their underwear in public.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Eugene Williams is the mayor of Lynwood. He says young men walk around town half-dressed, keeping major retailers and economic development away. He calls the new law a hot topic.

    The American Civil Liberties Union says the ordinance targets young men of color...............
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080720/ap_on_fe_st/odd_underwear_law

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,134

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    If the elderly people ruled the world..."I didn't shoot a chinaman in Korea for you to have your rear end hanging out!"

  3. #3
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    Whatever.

    I am sure the cops will not fine the old nasty men and their plumbers cracks or what about the women now who wear the shorts that are just about 3 inches below the waistline.

    Fucking bullshit!

  4. #4
    Mr Anderson's Avatar
    Mr Anderson is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,692

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.


    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.

  5. #5
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    "Mr" wrote:
    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.



    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.
    Nobody I know who "sags" their pants has their underwear showing. How is it alright for a women but not a man?

  6. #6
    Mr Anderson's Avatar
    Mr Anderson is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,692

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    "marstc09" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.



    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.
    Nobody I know who "sags" their pants has their underwear showing. How is it alright for a women but not a man?
    What's your definition of "sagging" then? No one I know has their pants far below their waist if they're going commando.

    I guess I'm missing something.

    And the woman part was a joke.

  7. #7
    C Mac D's Avatar
    C Mac D is offline Posting to P'own
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,493

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    "marstc09" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.



    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.
    Nobody I know who "sags" their pants has their underwear showing. How is it alright for a women but not a man?
    Fine by me.
    Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.

  8. #8
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    "Mr" wrote:
    "marstc09" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.



    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.
    Nobody I know who "sags" their pants has their underwear showing. How is it alright for a women but not a man?
    What's your definition of "sagging" then? No one I know has their pants far below their waist if they're going commando.

    I guess I'm missing something.

    And the woman part was a joke.
    They are trying to make justifiable through underwear. It is not like the style is too wear pants lower than waistline and not have a larger shirt on. Who the hell wears sagging pants and a tiny ass t-shirt?

  9. #9
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    "C" wrote:
    "marstc09" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.



    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.
    Nobody I know who "sags" their pants has their underwear showing. How is it alright for a women but not a man?
    Fine by me.
    But you get my point. How often do you see thongs hanging out?

  10. #10
    Mr Anderson's Avatar
    Mr Anderson is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,692

    Re: It's the law: No sagging pants in Chicago suburb

    "marstc09" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    "marstc09" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    Good.

    No one wants to see more than three inches of your underwear.



    Unless you're an attractive young woman. Then it's encouraged.
    Nobody I know who "sags" their pants has their underwear showing. How is it alright for a women but not a man?
    What's your definition of "sagging" then? No one I know has their pants far below their waist if they're going commando.

    I guess I'm missing something.

    And the woman part was a joke.
    They are trying to make justifiable through underwear. It is not like the style is too wear pants lower than waistline and not have a larger shirt on. Who the hell wears sagging pants and a tiny ass t-shirt?
    Ok now I see what you mean.

    I don't know actually, no one I know of does that.

    But really, whats the point of sagging under a big shirt, might as well pull them up and wear them more comfortably if no one can see it lol

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-06-2009, 02:40 PM
  2. "Pants Man"
    By shockzilla in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-04-2008, 07:32 AM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-05-2007, 05:52 AM
  4. Old Uniform Pants
    By Zeus in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-01-2006, 10:04 PM
  5. Building blows up in Northwest suburb of Twincities!
    By whackthepack in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-28-2004, 11:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •