Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,605
    Blog Entries
    1

    How to argue your point intelligently



    I don't think anyone here has ever risen to the pinnacle...

    (And you are all ass hats.)
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  2. #2
    smegmavike is offline Coach
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    903
    OK jiggly butt !
    That's pretty good.
    I prefer these 38 strategies.
    SCHOPENHAUER'S 38 STRATAGEMS, OR 38 WAYS TO WIN AN ARGUMENT

  3. #3
    kevoncox's Avatar
    kevoncox is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,916
    Quote Originally Posted by NodakPaul View Post


    I don't think anyone here has ever risen to the pinnacle...

    (And you are all ass hats.)
    I think many times i have.... but then people start arguing points that have nothing to do with the first point. Who won the 76 championship?

  4. #4
    Minniman's Avatar
    Minniman is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,459
    Quote Originally Posted by NodakPaul View Post
    I don't think anyone here has ever risen to the pinnacle.
    I would have to disagree. The assumption made is that the general inability to argue a point intelligently applies to the specific individual. That is an invalid deductive argument without evidence that you have taken a high confidence sample of posts of each member of this message board and evaluated them for logical consistency.

    Your premise also assumes that all of the subjects are "ass hats" and implies that no "ass hats" can argue a point intelligently. From this, you infer that "you don't think anyone here has ever risen to the pinnacle."

    While fans may make posts based on feelings or other intangibles, many fans will try to post based on a validated premise which includes support for a logical argument. Please review the topics about Ponder's passing stats over 15 yards as specific evidence to suggest your premise is invalid.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •