Re: Two questions.........
Try KFAN's site.
kfan.com
Sorry webby if im not supposed to provide links like that.
you should check yahoo.com for the game stats, we won 31-13 not by one point.
Re: Two questions.........
"carolinafan" wrote:
Quote:
1 - does anyone have a link where I can hear the Vikes games online?
None of the stuff on the home page of PPO works for me for some reason.
I've tried most of the station links provided on PPO, and the Vikes games are not being carried for some reason.
2 - I checked the box score and the Vikes only had about 6 or 7 balls thrown to wide receivers today?
Were we just grinding it out on the ground or using short passes out of the backfield.
When I saw 31 points I figured BJ was throwing it all over the field, then looking at the stats, it looked almost like a game a team would have lost.
For those of you that saw it, what's your take.
(And hey, beating Seattle is good even if it's by one point.
I was just wanting an overall synopsis).
1, I have no idea, try youtube maybe,
2.
This team won't be a passing team until TJ is the QB.
Johnson had a good game, but we cannot depend on him to win games for us
Re: Two questions.........
What the hel kinda site are you looking at that said we won by 1?
Re: Two questions.........
To question #2....
Yes, we ground it out most of the second half. We were up 17-10 after Moore's trick pass to Wiggins, then Chester broke that huge one to make it 24-10 and we just ground it out after that. In the second half we threw the ball 9 times and ran it 14...the fourth quarter though was 8 runs and 3 passes, obviously just grinding out the clock.
Brad did throw 8 of his 15 completions to receivers though....Robinson (4), Taylor (2), Williamson (1), McMullen (1).
Re: Two questions.........
"ChiTownVike" wrote:
Quote:
What the hel kinda site are you looking at that said we won by 1?
I'm not sure...but I don't think he was saying that we only won by one. I think he was saying, "Beating Seattle is good even if you only do it by one...here is the part he left out: but we beat them by 18 so that's even more impressive.
At least, I think that's what he was getting at.
Re: Two questions.........
We have had a lot of questions about this.
Try and look around here to see what you can find.
Re: Two questions.........
"Ltrey33" wrote:
Quote:
"ChiTownVike" wrote:
Quote:
What the hel kinda site are you looking at that said we won by 1?
I'm not sure...but I don't think he was saying that we only won by one. I think he was saying, "Beating Seattle is good even if you only do it by one...here is the part he left out:
but we beat them by 18 so that's even more impressive.
At least, I think that's what he was getting at.
I think he meant that as well, but I'm also not sure if he's a Vikings fan, so "we" might be "you"
looking at his name "CarolinaFan", he might be a Panthers fan just interested in watching our game.
Re: Two questions.........
"Ltrey33" wrote:
Quote:
"ChiTownVike" wrote:
Quote:
What the hel kinda site are you looking at that said we won by 1?
I'm not sure...but I don't think he was saying that we only won by one. I think he was saying, "Beating Seattle is good even if you only do it by one...here is the part he left out:
but we beat them by 18 so that's even more impressive.
At least, I think that's what he was getting at.
Thanks for helping the others out.
That's exactly what my point was.
I didn't get to hear the game, then read the score and thought we must have been wide open today.
I checked the box score and the passing game seemed very average?
I meant a 31-13 win over the Seahawks was great, but I'd have been happy with a one point win.
Not sure why the other posters thought I said we won by 1 point?
I was simply asking for input from those that saw it or heard it on the radio.
Re: Two questions.........
I'm not sure...but I don't think he was saying that we only won by one. I think he was saying, "Beating Seattle is good even if you only do it by one...here is the part he left out: but we beat them by 18 so that's even more impressive.
At least, I think that's what he was getting at.
[/quote]
I think he meant that as well, but I'm also not sure if he's a Vikings fan, so "we" might be "you"
looking at his name "CarolinaFan", he might be a Panthers fan just interested in watching our game.
[/quote]
I'm a University of South Carolina fan....became a Vike fan when TW was drafted.
