a sig for shawn9876uss

**Lotza** · 03-23-2006, 10:29 PM

whatd'ya tink?

/10

tanks

**V4L** · 03-23-2006, 10:31 PM

Decent..

6/10

**PurplePeopleEaters** · 03-23-2006, 10:31 PM

Pretty good. I like it. Try working a little more on the tech and text especially and you will be in good shape.

7.9/10.

**Lotza** · 03-23-2006, 10:32 PM

"PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:

Pretty good. I like it. Try working a little more on the tech and text especially and you will be in good shape.

7.9/10.

7.9 eh?

:lol:

thanks.

**pokeyisme** · 03-23-2006, 10:34 PM

not bad 9/10

**PurplePeopleEaters** · 03-23-2006, 10:35 PM

"Lotzapurple119" wrote:

"PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:

Pretty good. I like it. Try working a little more on the tech and text especially and you will be in good shape.

7.9/10.

7.9 eh?

:lol:

thanks.

Hahaha. I know it's pretty random. I just thought that the blur effect in the background was pretty much all you did to the picture and the text was sub par. So.. not as bad as a 7 but not quite an 8.

**VikesfaninWis** · 03-23-2006, 10:36 PM

Nice work Lotza.. 8/10

**V4L** · 03-23-2006, 10:37 PM

Yah the text is what threw it off most for me..

The top text I don't like much.. (Like u don't like my graffitti text) lol

And the bottom text u can't even read

I do like border deal on the inside or whatever.. U gotta teach me how to do that

I like how ur getting away from curving the hell outta ur sigs haha

**vikes4lyfe** · 03-23-2006, 10:37 PM

8/10

**PurplePeopleEaters** · 03-23-2006, 10:39 PM

Actually lotza.. To add to vikez comment.. This could use some curves. Not too much though.. just to add an effect to the photo. Right now the nate photo is pretty plain. Maybe a duplicated blurred layer set to overlay or something. Make it stand out a bit more.