Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51
  1. #11
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    I love how he tries to put in grammar and commas and what not but it's still way off

    Not being a grammar nazi cuz I dont use any but its funny that he tried


  2. #12
    IBleedPurple11's Avatar
    IBleedPurple11 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Mesa, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    414

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    haha Packers rush for 100 yards and we got people talking sheeeit.. thats funny. Congrats you won, we suck.. Peterson is still better than any RB on the packers. I cant wait to see the Cowboys destroy the packers in the playoffs WOOT WOOT! Go Boys!!


    *SKOL!*

  3. #13
    Vikes_King's Avatar
    Vikes_King is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,104

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    that was plain embarassing...


    http://vikesking.blogspot.com/

    "We’ll win our own Super Bowl, with our own players. Real Vikings. Something Brett Favre can never be."

    - Dan Calabrese

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    60

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    Remember when we were #1 in the rush defense, what happen?
    IT'S ALL GOOD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD!!!

  5. #15
    IBleedPurple11's Avatar
    IBleedPurple11 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Mesa, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    414

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    "purplepride_1961" wrote:
    Remember when we were #1 in the rush defense, what happen?
    We are #3 now.

    Our passing DEF is doing terrible. So teams pass on us 4 straights plays, then run when we dont exect it. Its hard for a lineman to pass rush 4 straight plays then adjust to the run. To fix our rushing DEF we gotta fix our passing DEF.

    Our DB's are mainly knows for being "hard hitters" i say we get a shut down corner instead of one that is just going to let them catch it for 20 yards then hit them hard haha.


    *SKOL!*

  6. #16
    leeland is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    "V4L" wrote:
    Maroon? HAHA

    Grant sucks.. He got pretty lucky

    We didn't plan for him at all and that was our fault
    Didn't look like the vikings planned for much but a beat down from the game I watched...and if I recall Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1 and that was before his injury...

    So stop making excuses and accept the loss

  7. #17
    tb04512's Avatar
    tb04512 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,803

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    "leeland" wrote:
    "V4L" wrote:
    Maroon? HAHA

    Grant sucks.. He got pretty lucky

    We didn't plan for him at all and that was our fault
    Didn't look like the vikings planned for much but a beat down from the game I watched...and if I recall Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1 and that was before his injury...

    So stop making excuses and accept the loss
    who hasnt accepted the loss?

    and itsa little different when the whole defense only has to key on one guy

    Thanks josdin00

  8. #18
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    "leeland" wrote:
    "V4L" wrote:
    Maroon? HAHA

    Grant sucks.. He got pretty lucky

    We didn't plan for him at all and that was our fault
    Didn't look like the vikings planned for much but a beat down from the game I watched...and if I recall Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1 and that was before his injury...

    So stop making excuses and accept the loss
    Wow!
    How trollish of you to show up after the fact.
    Take a lot of balls for that.
    :

  9. #19
    Vikes_King's Avatar
    Vikes_King is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,104

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    "ultravikingfan" wrote:
    "leeland" wrote:
    "V4L" wrote:
    Maroon? HAHA

    Grant sucks.. He got pretty lucky

    We didn't plan for him at all and that was our fault
    Didn't look like the vikings planned for much but a beat down from the game I watched...and if I recall Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1 and that was before his injury...

    So stop making excuses and accept the loss
    lol, none of us are saying "omg if he didnt rush for 110 (whatever) yards we would have won!!" we would have lost regardless.
    The only thing thats been said, and i believe you know its true, Grant isn't a good running back.
    Yes he played a good game, but thats it

    "Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1" lol, dont even begin to kid yourself and say "omg grant is better than AD!!!!!" He had one good game this season, AD had a record setting performance.


    Favre (and our pass defense/rush) beat us.
    I'll consider him a decent running back if he can put up those numbers one more time this season against a decent (top 10) rushing defense.



    http://vikesking.blogspot.com/

    "We’ll win our own Super Bowl, with our own players. Real Vikings. Something Brett Favre can never be."

    - Dan Calabrese

  10. #20
    leeland is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11

    Re: PAckers Have No Running Game?

    "Vikes_King" wrote:
    [quote]
    "ultravikingfan" wrote:
    "leeland" wrote:
    "V4L" wrote:
    Maroon? HAHA

    Grant sucks.. He got pretty lucky

    We didn't plan for him at all and that was our fault
    Didn't look like the vikings planned for much but a beat down from the game I watched...and if I recall Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1 and that was before his injury...

    So stop making excuses and accept the loss
    lol, none of us are saying "omg if he didnt rush for 110 (whatever) yards we would have won!!" we would have lost regardless.
    The only thing thats been said, and i believe you know its true, Grant isn't a good running back.
    Yes he played a good game, but thats it

    "Grant out rushed "All Day" almost 3 to 1" lol, dont even begin to kid yourself and say "omg grant is better than AD!!!!!" He had one good game this season, AD had a record setting performance.


    Favre (and our pass defense/rush) beat us.
    I'll consider him a decent running back if he can put up those numbers one more time this season against a decent (top 10) rushing defense.

    Man you guys need to take a chill pill...and let me ask this...how do you know Grant is not a good running back.
    You are basing that comment on what?
    He has been a starter for 3 games and rushed decent in all of them.
    Saying that he isn't good or that he sucks or that he is lucky is a silly statement because you have nothing to back it up with.

    it would be the same as me saying that Grant is as good as X-Superstar because he did good in one game.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Packers May Solve Running Back Conundrum From Within
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-11-2007, 08:38 PM
  2. RUNNING GAME?
    By hovan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-23-2006, 03:26 PM
  3. Packers admit to no running game.
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-04-2006, 08:16 AM
  4. our running game
    By napo58 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 02:07 PM
  5. What Running Back should start against the Packers?
    By briboy75 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-24-2004, 10:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •