Bears fan's Cliff notes perspective of "THE GAME"

**PolarGrizz** · 09-30-2009, 09:50 AM

From the PackersHome board comes a truncated Prediction / Survey of the game.

I could care less who wins this game. Having said this here is what I think happens

Over/Under.....I see 51 as the number - OVER

Peterson 125 rushing.....I see Purple Jesus @ 144 yds Rush / 2TDS / - OVER

Allen 5 sacks.....TWO SACKS - under

Favre 200 passing I see 21 of 30 / 258 YDS / 2 TDS / 2 int - OVER

Because of the excessive hump dome noise levels, combined with Green Bays propensity for O-Line penalties, I like Minny to eek out a close win

Packers 27
Vikings
31

**BloodyHorns82** · 09-30-2009, 11:09 AM

Most of your scenario looks pretty realistic to me.
Although whoever thinks Allen by himself is going to get 5 sacks must have some pretty thick purple shades on.
Definitely safe to go under there.

**V4L** · 09-30-2009, 11:15 AM

I don't see Peterson going for around a buck 50 that game.. I see a productive game but not that well

Favre stats could be about right

Allen.. nah.. He is just starting to pick it up and has never had a 5 sack game if I recall correctly

Score.. I see it about that tho!

**oaklandzoo24** · 09-30-2009, 11:34 AM

"PolarGrizz" wrote:

From the PackersHome board comes a truncated Prediction / Survey of the game.

I could care less who wins this game. Having said this here is what I think happens

Over/Under.....I see 51 as the number - OVER

Peterson 125 rushing.....I see Purple Jesus @ 144 yds Rush / 2TDS / - OVER

Allen 5 sacks.....TWO SACKS - under

Favre 200 passing I see 21 of 30 / 258 YDS / 2 TDS / 2 int - OVER

Because of the excessive hump dome noise levels, combined with Green Bays propensity for O-Line penalties, I like Minny to eek out a close win

Packers 27
Vikings
31

I assume you mean 5 tackles and 2 sacks for JA.
I like that number but 2 sacks are tough to get, but JA is capable.
I think AD will have a huge game vs. the 3-4 D, but I don't see Farve throwing 2 TDs and 2 Picks.
Maybe one of each.
I like your final score though as both teams are going to look to throw the ball more in this one IMO.
I just hope we keep givin AD the rock because I love him against 3-4's, especially ones that are in transition.

**dfosterf** · 09-30-2009, 12:00 PM

Just to prove it is not all TOTAL smack from yours truly during this week.

This was my reply to the Grizz and his prediction:

Not a bad analysis at all, Grizz.

I would go sicker on the over of AD...plus that damn CT has our number as well.

Jared Allen. Key to the game, imo

If he is getting through, (and co.) we are dead meat, mostly, but hope for some big plays (doable against them, imo)

Favre over-- I agree also...Will hope for some bad Brett interceptions here. Also very likely, imo.

IF it gets to that over on the points, I like our chances a whole lot more.

Packers 31
Vikings 27

Putting a homer spin on an excellent prediction.
;D

**BloodyHorns82** · 09-30-2009, 12:18 PM

"dfosterf" wrote:

Just to prove it is not all TOTAL smack from yours truly during this week.

This was my reply to the Grizz and his prediction:

Not a bad analysis at all, Grizz.

I would go sicker on the over of AD...plus that damn CT has our number as well.

Jared Allen. Key to the game, imo

If he is getting through, (and co.) we are dead meat, mostly, but hope for some big plays (doable against them, imo)

Favre over-- I agree also...Will hope for some bad Brett interceptions here. Also very likely, imo.

IF it gets to that over on the points, I like our chances a whole lot more.

Packers 31
Vikings 27

Putting a homer spin on an excellent prediction.
;D

I hope our defense doesn't crumble to the point of allowing 31 points.
That's almost unheard of.

**Formo** · 09-30-2009, 12:23 PM

No guys..
Someone at the PackerHome forum had given the lines as follows:

AP rushing yards, 150
Allen sacks, 5
Favre passing, 200 yards

The reason they put the line so high for Allen was because they are pretty upset with their offensive line play. (Odom getting 5 sacks for the Bungles?)

**jargomcfargo** · 09-30-2009, 12:24 PM

"dfosterf" wrote:

Just to prove it is not all TOTAL smack from yours truly during this week.

This was my reply to the Grizz and his prediction:

Not a bad analysis at all, Grizz.

I would go sicker on the over of AD...plus that gol 'darnit CT has our number as well.

Jared Allen. Key to the game, imo

If he is getting through, (and co.) we are dead meat, mostly, but hope for some big plays (doable against them, imo)

Favre over-- I agree also...Will hope for some bad Brett interceptions here. Also very likely, imo.

IF it gets to that over on the points, I like our chances a whole lot more.

Packers 31
Vikings 27

Putting a homer spin on an excellent prediction.
;D

I think that's a pretty good analysis.

I predict it to be a little more Peterson and under on the Favre prediction.

Allen won't get 5 sacks, but the team as a whole should.

I'm hoping you don't run another punt back for 6. But it cetainly is a possibility.

Since I'm bold enough to predict Peterson will have greater than 200 yds. rushing, I predict.......

Vikings
34
Packers 17

**bad93ex** · 09-30-2009, 12:28 PM

I see All Day having a great day.
Steven Jackson had a good day behind a horrible o-line and Cedric Benson racked up some very nice yardage.
Matt Forte didn't get the numbers because the Bears abandoned the run very early and looking back for them that was a very big mistake.
Had they ran the ball or set up screen plays that would have given time for Cutler to settle down and show up like he did in the second half.
Cutler looked good in both games since then.

Brett will not have to carry this team like he did against the 49ers because ST will show up again as the Pack ST has some serious problems.
If he does take a shot or three downfield who is the safety going to be Brandon Chillar?!?! as they try to contain AD.
Woodson has shown that he has lost a step as he got torched by Knox and Palmer was able to pick them apart with OchoCinco and Chris Henry.
They may try to pick on the safties a bit in this game.

Jared Allen will get home more than two times as well.
He will be the best DE that that line will have since thus far in the season hopefully they move him around so he can add even more pressure on Rodgers.

**ultravikingfan** · 09-30-2009, 12:39 PM

"Formo" wrote:

No guys..
Someone at the PackerHome forum had given the lines as follows:

AP rushing yards, 150
Allen sacks, 5
Favre passing, 200 yards

The reason they put the line so high for Allen was because they are pretty upset with their offensive line play. (Odom getting 5 sacks for the Bungles?)

Not to mention, Rogers has been sacked 12 times now.