Thread: You Again? the Top 10 Vikings That Came Back

The biggest question on many Vikings fans' minds may be, when will the 2011 NFL season begin?

A close second could be to whom will Christian Ponder be throwing the football? With Sidney Rice set to test the free-agent market, and with Bernard Berrian's fabulous impression of the invisible man, that could leave only Percy Harvin.


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/757061-minnesota-vikings-you-again-the-top-10-vikings-that-came-back

Thanks for the read my friend.

As long as they don't expect Randy to run anything other than an 8 or a 9 route, I wouldn't be to upset (well I guess I would) if they brought him back.

I still say Berrian is fine as long as you don't ask him to run routes in traffic. He's definately not a slot reciever.

AAAAAAARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1100066

AAAAAAARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey, I warned ya.

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1100068

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1100066

AAAAAAARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey, I warned ya.

There should be warning labels on all BR links....something like this:

WARNING!!! This link is to BleacherReport. Chances are this article is poorly thought out, factually inaccurate, and will erode your brain...but Marrdro will cite sections of it in his "discussions" anyway. Read at own risk.

Caine

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1100075

There should be warning labels on all BR links....something like this:

WARNING!!! This link is to BleacherReport. Chances are this article is poorly thought out, factually inaccurate, and will erode your brain...but Marrdro will cite sections of it in his "discussions" anyway. Read at own risk, especially if you are incapable of coming up, or having the mental capacity to deal with, any sort of original thought.

Caine

Fixed it for ya.

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1100084

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1100075

There should be warning labels on all BR links....something like this:

WARNING!!! This link is to BleacherReport. Chances are this article is poorly thought out, factually inaccurate, and will erode your brain...but Marrdro will cite sections of it in his "discussions" anyway. Read at own risk, especially if you are incapable of coming up, or having the mental capacity to deal with, any sort of original thought.

Caine

Fixed it for ya.

Riiiiight, because being "factually inaccurate" is OK as long as you label it "original thought"....

Where I'm from, we just call it "Stupid".

Caine

Originally Posted by "Caine" #1100086

Riiiiight, because being "factually inaccurate" is OK as long as you label it "original thought"....

Where I'm from, we just call it "Stupid".

Caine

this