Results 21 to 30 of 92
-
05-29-2005, 04:44 AM #21
GM
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,232
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
as long as they are still the vikings i would have no problem rootin for my team .
i think sacramento needs a football team , that would make me even more of a fan if possible.
http://justlube.net/?page_id=44
-
05-29-2005, 04:45 AM #22
Ring of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 4,161
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
You're an evil man Los, have you casted a spell so it is the Vikings that move to LA? You seem to wish that. I don't blame you, if I were the Packers I'd fear the Vikings twice a year too, in which case I'd want them to move out of the division completely as well. :grin:
-
05-29-2005, 04:48 AM #23
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 2,160
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
"LosAngelis" wrote:
They are going to have to change the team name if that happens. Nothing "saintly" about L.A. :lol:I'm hearing the Saints as the likely move now to LA, moreso than the Vikes.
-
05-29-2005, 05:18 AM #24
Pro-Bowler
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 409
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
"LosAngelis" wrote:
Good, let the saints move. I never liked them anyway. Any team that has a half peeled bannana for a logo deserves to be moved. :wink:I'm hearing the Saints as the likely move now to LA, moreso than the Vikes.
-
05-29-2005, 05:32 AM #25
Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,720
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
Nope, I'd probably give up on all sports if it happend. Also if they do move they wouldn't still be called the Vikings either. Minnesota has ties with that name Los Angeles does not.
Minnesota Vikings : Simply the best
-
05-29-2005, 05:45 AM #26
Jersey Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 6,111
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
I would more than likely stop rooting for them and become a fan of another team (likely the Rams or Falcons).
I was born in St. Louis, so I went through Bill "F'ing" Bidwell moving the Cardinals and really have a dislike for them to this day because he is the owner.
So, I take back my earlier thoughts ... I would likely bail on an owner who did not leave the Vikings where they belong.
-
05-29-2005, 05:46 AM #27
Administrator
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- NE Ohio
- Posts
- 24,506
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
"FuadFan" wrote:
I'm with Fuad here.Nope, I'd probably give up on all sports if it happend. Also if they do move they wouldn't still be called the Vikings either. Minnesota has ties with that name Los Angeles does not.
I'll start supporting the WNBA and join one of their fan sites and talk womens basketball with the other 3 members! :lol:
-
05-29-2005, 06:16 AM #28
Jersey Retired
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 32,063
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
LOL, ultra!!!
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
05-29-2005, 06:25 AM #29
Jersey Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 6,615
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
Well I have no real loyalty to minnesota persay, so I would have to say I would still be a fan.
Would be sad though.
I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.
-
05-29-2005, 06:40 AM #30
Jersey Retired
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 32,063
Re: Would you still be a vikings fan if....
The owner who moves the Vikings out of Minnesota would replace Red as the most reviled Vikings owner in history!!!
Hands down!BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks