Thread: Would you run 4 wideouts?
-
03-02-2005, 04:55 AM #1
Would you run 4 wideouts?
Tice has moved towards running the ball more. While I think that's not a bad decision, I believe that showing a full set of Recievers would be nice. I would like to also see a seasoned Safty aquired maybe a "spy" who can hide out behind the "D" and recognize the formations. Sort of like David Fullcher did for the Bengals a few years ago. I do think however that the Vikings will play much better as a team if there tended to be no one player that stood-out but, rather players who became part of a machine.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something"
Dick Butkus
"They say Football s a matter of life and death - but it s more important than that"
-
03-02-2005, 06:43 AM #2
Would you run 4 wideouts?
who would be the 4th? keenan howry?
-
03-02-2005, 07:33 AM #3
Would you run 4 wideouts?
it depends on the situation also.. we did run some 4 wide.. do u mean more?

-
03-02-2005, 10:20 AM #4
Would you run 4 wideouts?
I believe with the RB Crew we have, run a wishbone base offense(Moore, Smith, Williams), this would total set up the passing game and no need for a FB/TB.

Let s put the women and children to bed and go look for dinner... (the Program)
-
03-02-2005, 10:29 AM #5
Would you run 4 wideouts?
I honestly am so confused about our RB's, I mean into the season I surley thought we had stumbled upon one of the best rb trios ever, then twords then end it just faded away? I think Mewelde needs more playing time, the kid tore it up. While O smith may enjoy the weed, I still think hes a great RB. However I would trade him or bennett for defense.

Theres NOTHING greater then a Florida Gator!
"I promise everyone this. When Childress is let go in two years I can honestly say this.
"I am not surprised"."-PurplePackerEater
-
03-02-2005, 10:33 AM #6
Would you run 4 wideouts?
I couldn't agree more, Miami needs a RB more! Send Bennett down there and get a SS or FS! Patrick Sartian would do!!!!

Let s put the women and children to bed and go look for dinner... (the Program)
-
03-02-2005, 10:45 AM #7
Would you run 4 wideouts?
yes why have we not tried pursuing surtain, from what i hear he can be had for not much, give them bennett, this would make sense for both teams
Son, when you participate in sporting events it s not whether you win or lose, it s how drunk you get. -Homer J. Simpson
It s not just about me and my dream of doing nothing; it s about all of us...together!-Peter Gibbons
-
03-02-2005, 10:55 AM #8
Rookie
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 146
Would you run 4 wideouts?
A wishbone in the NFL????
Yeah Right.
-
03-02-2005, 10:56 AM #9
Would you run 4 wideouts?
"PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:
Michael Bennettwho would be the 4th? keenan howry?
Just Kidding!
He probably won't be able to play WR from AZ.
-
03-02-2005, 11:00 AM #10
Would you run 4 wideouts?
"vikingsfanatic94" wrote:
What do you think that the Phins want to pick with there nice draft choice in the first round. Maybe a RB, we(not me) don't think that Bennett is a durable RB so why do you think that the Phins are going to Fall for that.I couldn't agree more, Miami needs a RB more! Send Bennett down there and get a SS or FS! Patrick Sartian would do!!!!
Maybe they want to draft Cadillac Williams or Benson. They sure loved Ricky Williams, they would love Benson too.
After that argument, do you think they are willing to take Bennett.
Similar Threads
-
Fringe wideouts hope to catch on
By Marrdro in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 08-20-2011, 02:01 AM -
Wideouts Help Spring Peterson
By Prophet in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 12-09-2007, 11:19 AM -
SC Wideouts
By dougiefresh in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 05-02-2007, 08:54 PM -
Top 10 Underrated Wideouts of the Last 25 Years (SI)
By Slade in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 18Last Post: 05-15-2006, 06:47 AM -
Lions wideouts continue to disappoint
By HandsTeam in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 28Last Post: 04-07-2006, 07:14 PM



Reply With Quote






Bookmarks