Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35
  1. #21
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "DiehardVikesFan" wrote:
    I say we trade for Vince Young and run the veer.
    Vince Young, TJack and Michael Vick in the same backfield would make a KAO. Maybe that is what they are planning. 8)
    throw in ted ginn at runingback and we have ourselfs a track team! oh wait we need a footall team.... :-[
    Don't forget Michael Bennett!

  2. #22
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "Ltrey" wrote:
    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "DiehardVikesFan" wrote:
    I say we trade for Vince Young and run the veer.
    Vince Young, TJack and Michael Vick in the same backfield would make a KAO. Maybe that is what they are planning. 8)


    throw in ted ginn at runingback and we have ourselfs a track team! oh wait we need a footall team.... :-[
    Don't forget Michael Bennett!

    And Randy Moss ;D

  3. #23
    renovikesfan is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    772

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4



    Too late...Bennett's already forgotten...LOL

  4. #24
    mr.woo's Avatar
    mr.woo is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,213

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "Ltrey" wrote:
    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "DiehardVikesFan" wrote:
    I say we trade for Vince Young and run the veer.
    Vince Young, TJack and Michael Vick in the same backfield would make a KAO. Maybe that is what they are planning. 8)


    throw in ted ginn at runingback and we have ourselfs a track team! oh wait we need a footall team.... :-[
    Don't forget Michael Bennett!

    And Randy Moss ;D
    hells yea! now all we need is some fast guys to play linemen!
    woo out
    just two corn cobs shy of a bushel

  5. #25
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    Anywho...back to the thread at hand.

    I like the 3-4. There's no way the Vikings have the personnel to run it, but I have always been a fan. IMO, it gives you so much more freedom in trying to deceive the offense in blitzes and coverage. If you don't have dominant pass rushing offensive lineman, it is a good way to get pressure on the quarterback if you have the linebackers to do it. Which, of course, we don't.

  6. #26
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "Ltrey" wrote:
    "mr.woo" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    [quote author=DiehardVikesFan link=topic=32610.msg552063#msg552063 date=1174200200]
    I say we trade for Vince Young and run the veer.
    Vince Young, TJack and Michael Vick in the same backfield would make a KAO. Maybe that is what they are planning. 8)


    throw in ted ginn at runingback and we have ourselfs a track team! oh wait we need a footall team.... :-[
    Don't forget Michael Bennett!

    And Randy Moss ;D
    hells yea! now all we need is some fast guys to play linemen!
    [/quote]

    Let's just agree to play the Cover 2...since we barely have enough LBs to fill THREE spots, let alone FOUR! >
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  7. #27
    The Dropper's Avatar
    The Dropper is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    2,101

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    I would not like us in three-four.
    I would not like us losing more.
    I would not like us changing scheme,
    I would not like this for our team.
    I do not like this silly plan.
    I do not like it, SageVike I am.

  8. #28
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,564

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "The" wrote:
    I would not like us in three-four.
    I would not like us losing more.
    I would not like us changing scheme,
    I would not like this for our team.
    I do not like this silly plan.
    I do not like it, SageVike I am.
    LOL

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    652

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "The" wrote:
    I would not like us in three-four.
    I would not like us losing more.
    I would not like us changing scheme,
    I would not like this for our team.
    I do not like this silly plan.
    I do not like it, SageVike I am.
    I agree. We are still adjusting to the West Coast Offense and plus when you have two dominent DTs why not play them both. Why do we have to bench one. Pat and kevin Williams both probowlers and both awesome. Plus. The 4-3 is the keeps our run defense as legendary as it is
    "Some Coaches pray for wisdom. I pray for 300 lbs. lineman. They give me plenty of wisdom"
    -Chuck Noll

    R.I.P. Sean Taylor

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    919

    Re: Would You Like Us In 3-4

    "The" wrote:
    I would not like us in three-four.
    I would not like us losing more.
    I would not like us changing scheme,
    I would not like this for our team.
    I do not like this silly plan.
    I do not like it, SageVike I am.
    are you challanging me???
    :P
    "God has blessed me tremendously. I'd be a fool to complain."
    "From what I understand, the coaches will put the best 11 on the field."
    -Tyrell Johnson

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •